Proto-Austronesian Hebrew: Difference between revisions

From FrathWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (gotta go to bed)
(updating chronology)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata" id="inuse" style="background: #cfc; border: 1px solid #aaa; margin: 0 2.5%; padding: 0 10px">
<div class="boilerplate metadata" id="inuse" style="background: #cfc; border: 1px solid #aaa; margin: 0 2.5%; padding: 0 10px">
This is a diachronic constructed language.  Imagine 800 B.C. Hebrew met 800 B.C. Tagalog and hung out for 800 years before being found 2000 years later by a Japanese linguist.
This is a diachronic constructed language.  Imagine that in 800 B.C. Hebrew met Tagalog and hung out for centuries before being found 2000 years later by a Japanese linguist.
</div>
</div>
{{Language|
{{Language|
| English = Proto-Austronesian Hebrew
| English = Proto-Austronesian Hebrew
| native = Dabaru Oiberim
| native = Dabarūm 'Abritūma
| country = the Philippines and Palau?
| country = the Philippines
| universe = almost the real world
| universe = almost the real world
| speakers = none presently
| speakers = none presently
Line 21: Line 21:
}}
}}


After their capture in and transportation from the Ancient Near East (ANE), the Paleo-Hebrew (PH) people maintained their language and culture as best they could while surrounded by the vast Lapitan Empire in Oceania. The one advantage they had in this otherwise impossible quest was their knowledge of writing, something that would not come to the area for nearly a thousand years. The heterogenous make-up of the original core group who left the Levant cannot be ascertained with certainty, but scholars speculate that speakers of Phoenician, Moabite, (Ugaritic?,) Akkadian, and Late Egyptian (Coptic) had some influence, but the language is definitely Israelian Hebrew<ref>A term preferred by Gary A. Rendsburg of Cornell</ref>, that is, Northern, "Aramaic influenced" Hebrew.  They seem to have left the Levant in the eighth century B.C. and travelled mostly over land until they reached the Kingdom of the Philippines and Palau. Over the centuries, the Austronesian sounds (and grammar!) of Proto-Austronesian (PAn) and Proto-Malayo-Polynesian (PMP) radically reshaped this unexpected stranger from the other side of the world.
After their capture in and transportation from the Ancient Near East (ANE), the Paleo-Hebrew (PH) people maintained their language and culture as best they could while surrounded by the feudal lords of the Philippines. The one advantage they had in this otherwise impossible quest was their knowledge of writing, something that would not become common in the area for nearly a thousand years. The heterogenous make-up of the original core group who left the Levant was very diverse, but scholars speculate that speakers of Phoenician, Moabite, (Ugaritic?,) Akkadian, and Amorite had some influence.  The writers, however, identify as Israelian Hebrew<ref>A term preferred by [http://jewishstudies.rutgers.edu/faculty/core-faculty-information/gary-a-rendsburg Gary A. Rendsburg of Rutgers]</ref>, that is, Northern, "Aramaic influenced" Hebrew.  The majority left the Levant in the eight century B.C. and travelled mostly over land until they reached the Kingdom of the Philippines.  Some must have come earlier and either scholars or documents (or both) must also have come later. Over the centuries, the Austronesian sounds (and grammar!) of Proto-Austronesian (PAn) and Proto-Malayo-Polynesian (PMP) radically reshaped this unexpected stranger from the other side of the world.


In the 1920's and 30's, Hiroyuki Fujisaka (藤坂 弘幸) discovered an unknown number of inscriptions, tablets and ostraca on the island of Palau, which were written in a both cuneiform and a Brāhmī script even older than the edicts of Ashoka. He transcribed all of them into a unique adaptation of the Japanese ''katakana'' syllabary.  He returned to his professorship in Taihoku (Taipei) and sent his notes back to Japan.  Fujisaka was killed in the war, and his notes were lost until 1996. All original artifacts are lost, though extensive digs are underway, looking for more. In 2007, Graham McCauley connected PAH with what came to be known as [[Proto-Polynesian Hebrew]] (PPH) and proposed the overarching term "Proto-Oceanic Hebrew" to cover them both. PPH (somewhat arbitrarily) extends from 1 A.D. to around 1000 A.D., when these Semitic people(s) who had been transported as slaves '''''without''''' a writing system to New Zealand where taken off-world.  On Chatham Island, they had invented a new alphabet (perhaps under the influence of the Easter Island civilization?), and wrote the famous Motutapu Ostraca,  some time around the middle of the first millennium of the Common Era.
In the 1920's and 30's, Hiroyuki Fujisaka (藤坂 弘幸) discovered an unknown number of inscriptions, tablets and ostraca on the island of Mindoro, which were written in a cuneiform script.  This script was purportedly the basis for the Brāhmī script, even older than the edicts of Ashoka. Hiro transcribed all of them into a unique adaptation of the Japanese ''katakana'' syllabary.  He returned to his professorship in Taihoku (Taipei) and sent his notes back to Japan.  Fujisaka was killed in the war, and his notes were lost until 1996. All the original artifacts are still lost, though extensive digs are underway, looking for more. In 2007, Graham McCauley connected PAH with what is now known as [[Proto-Polynesian Hebrew]] (PPH) and proposed the overarching term "Proto-Oceanic Hebrew" to cover them both. PPH (somewhat arbitrarily) extends from 1 A.D. to around 1000 A.D., when these Semitic people(s) who had been involuntarily transported '''''without''''' a writing system to New Zealand then were taken off-world.  On Chatham Island, they had invented a new alphabet (which later influenced the Easter Island civilization), and wrote the famous Motutapu Ostraca,  some time around the middle of the first millennium of the Common Era.




Line 42: Line 42:
# [[Proto-Austronesian Hebrew/Morphology|Morphology]]
# [[Proto-Austronesian Hebrew/Morphology|Morphology]]
## Nouns
## Nouns
## Adjectives
## Numbers
## Pronouns
## Pronouns
## Adverbs
## Particles
## Prepositions
## Prepositions
## Verbs (brief outline)
## Numbers
# [[Proto-Austronesian Hebrew/Verbs|Verbs]]
# [[Proto-Austronesian Hebrew/Verbs|Verbs]]
 
## History
* [[Proto-Austronesian Hebrew/Swadesh]]
## Stems
## Weak Verbs
# [[Proto-Austronesian Hebrew/Texts|Texts]]
## [[Proto-Austronesian Hebrew/Texts/Genesis 1-11|Genesis 1-11]]
## [[Proto-Austronesian Hebrew/Texts/Jonah|Jonah]]
# [[Proto-Austronesian Hebrew/Lexicon|Lexicon]]
## [[Proto-Austronesian Hebrew/Swadesh|Swadesh]]


<references />
<references />

Latest revision as of 14:42, 9 February 2013

This is a diachronic constructed language. Imagine that in 800 B.C. Hebrew met Tagalog and hung out for centuries before being found 2000 years later by a Japanese linguist.

Proto-Austronesian Hebrew
Dabarūm 'Abritūma
Spoken in: the Philippines
Conworld: almost the real world
Total speakers: none presently
Genealogical classification: Afro-Asiatic
Semitic
Northwest Semitic
Proto-Austronesian Hebrew
Basic word order: VSO/SVO
Morphological type: inflecting
Morphosyntactic alignment: Austronesian
Writing system:
Created by:
Robert Marshall Murphy 2012 A.D.

After their capture in and transportation from the Ancient Near East (ANE), the Paleo-Hebrew (PH) people maintained their language and culture as best they could while surrounded by the feudal lords of the Philippines. The one advantage they had in this otherwise impossible quest was their knowledge of writing, something that would not become common in the area for nearly a thousand years. The heterogenous make-up of the original core group who left the Levant was very diverse, but scholars speculate that speakers of Phoenician, Moabite, (Ugaritic?,) Akkadian, and Amorite had some influence. The writers, however, identify as Israelian Hebrew[1], that is, Northern, "Aramaic influenced" Hebrew. The majority left the Levant in the eight century B.C. and travelled mostly over land until they reached the Kingdom of the Philippines. Some must have come earlier and either scholars or documents (or both) must also have come later. Over the centuries, the Austronesian sounds (and grammar!) of Proto-Austronesian (PAn) and Proto-Malayo-Polynesian (PMP) radically reshaped this unexpected stranger from the other side of the world.

In the 1920's and 30's, Hiroyuki Fujisaka (藤坂 弘幸) discovered an unknown number of inscriptions, tablets and ostraca on the island of Mindoro, which were written in a cuneiform script. This script was purportedly the basis for the Brāhmī script, even older than the edicts of Ashoka. Hiro transcribed all of them into a unique adaptation of the Japanese katakana syllabary. He returned to his professorship in Taihoku (Taipei) and sent his notes back to Japan. Fujisaka was killed in the war, and his notes were lost until 1996. All the original artifacts are still lost, though extensive digs are underway, looking for more. In 2007, Graham McCauley connected PAH with what is now known as Proto-Polynesian Hebrew (PPH) and proposed the overarching term "Proto-Oceanic Hebrew" to cover them both. PPH (somewhat arbitrarily) extends from 1 A.D. to around 1000 A.D., when these Semitic people(s) who had been involuntarily transported without a writing system to New Zealand then were taken off-world. On Chatham Island, they had invented a new alphabet (which later influenced the Easter Island civilization), and wrote the famous Motutapu Ostraca, some time around the middle of the first millennium of the Common Era.


  1. Writing System
  2. Phonology
    1. History (a.k.a. Grand Master Plan)
    2. Consonants
    3. Vowels
    4. Phonotactics
  3. Grammar
    1. Tri-letter Roots
    2. Case and State
    3. Gender
    4. Number
    5. Definiteness
    6. Tense-Aspect-Mood
    7. Voice
  4. Morphology
    1. Nouns
    2. Pronouns
    3. Adverbs
    4. Particles
    5. Prepositions
    6. Verbs (brief outline)
    7. Numbers
  5. Verbs
    1. History
    2. Stems
    3. Weak Verbs
  6. Texts
    1. Genesis 1-11
    2. Jonah
  7. Lexicon
    1. Swadesh
  1. ↑ A term preferred by Gary A. Rendsburg of Rutgers
Retrieved from "http://www.frathwiki.com/index.php?title=Proto-Austronesian_Hebrew&oldid=72930"