Proto-Hesperic (2018)

Proto-Hesperic is a Macro-Indo-European diachronic conlang by Jörg Rhiemeier that is currently under construction, and represents the reconstructed common ancestor of the Hesperic language family. It is a lostlang and forms a part of the League of Lost Languages. Proto-Hesperic is a head-final agglutinating active-stative language related to Proto-Indo-European, assumed to have been spoken in Central Europe around 4000 BC; it also resembles Proto-Uralic in its morphology, and seems to form a kind of "missing link" between the two families. The vocabulary is in part based on Proto-Indo-European, in part on words with uncertain etymologies in Celtic and Germanic that may be loanwords from lost substratum languages; there are also some original creations in the vocabulary and a few words from argots such as Shelta or Rotwelsch.

Phonology

Consonants

	Labial	Coronal	Palatal	Velar
Aspirated stops	*ph	*th		*kh
Neutral stops	(*p)	*t		*k
Voiced stops	*b	*d		*g
Fricatives		*s		*x
Nasals	*m	*n
Liquids		*l *r
Semivowels	*w		*j

Notes

• All phonemes can be assumed to have the IPA values. The most uncertainty is with *x, which could have been anything from velar to glottal; however, it probably was not simply /h/, as stops followed by *x show different developments than aspirated stops (see Drummond's Law on this matter).

• The phoneme *p (neutral labial stop) is marginal and may not have existed. All Hesperic words with this sound have limited distribution and may have been borrowed.

• Aspirated and voiced stops do not co-occur in a true Proto-Hesperic root; exceptions occur only in a few words with limited distribution that probably were borrowed from other languages. Neutral stops may co-occur with either.

• No two neutral stops may occur in the same Proto-Hesperic root, and they do not occur in affixes. Again, exceptions have limited distribution and are probably borrowed.

• Because of these constraints, it has been suggested that the neutral stops once were ejectives (compare the glottalic theory in Indo-European), but as no Hesperic language actually shows such ejectives, this is doubtful. It should also be considered that in the Kartvelian languages often cited by supporters of the glottalic theory, no such constraints exist (e.g., Georgian k'op'e 'ladle' has two ejectives in the root, one of them labial). The constraints postulated by the glottalists do exist, however, in Akkadian, which disallows two "emphatic" consonants in a root and also lacks a labial "emphatic" stop (see Geers' Law). Yet, it may indeed be the case that the neutral stops evolved from some highly marked type of articulation, but it is pretty certain that at the time of breakup, they just were ordinary stops that were neither voiced nor aspirated.

• The language may have also had a labialized velar series (*kh° *k° *g° *x°), but these probably just were plain velars followed by *w.

• Likewise there may have also been a labialized coronal series (*th° *t° *d° *s°), but that is even less likely than the labialized velar series. They probably were just plain coronals followed by *w.

Vowels

	Front	Central	Back
High	*i		*u
Low		*a

Notes

• The diphthongs *ai and *au exist, but are perhaps better considered vowel-semivowel groups *aj and *aw instead, as they show the same distribution as vowel-liquid groups.

• The high vowels *i and *u do not occur in roots or affixes in which a nasal, liquid or semivowel follows the vowel (across morpheme boundaries, such combinations may exist). Exceptions may occur in words of limited distribution that are probably borrowed from non-Hesperic languages.

• There are no vowel-initial lexical roots; all roots begin with a consonant. The demonstrative *a (source of the West Hesperic definite article) is an exception.

Syllables

The maximal syllable structure is sCRVRC, wherein C is any consonant ans R a nasal, liquid or semivowel.

Accent

Accent in Proto-Hesperic appears to have been non-distinctive. Evidence from some daughter languages indicate a stress accent on the penultimate syllable.

Morphology

Proto-Hesperic shows an agglutinating morphology. The language is mostly suffixing.

Nouns

Nouns fall into two classes: animate and inanimate. The animate class consists of words for people, animals, plants, social groups, supernatural entities, natural forces and a few others. All other nouns are inanimate. Animate nouns are inflected for three numbers (singular, dual, plural) and five cases (agentive, genitive, partitive, dative, objective). Inanimate nouns are indeclinable; their single form is syntactically objective singular.

There is no distinction between masculine or feminine genders, but animate nouns referring to single persons or animals may receive the suffixes *-wa 'male' or *-ja 'female'.

Declension of an animate noun

Example: *kwathasa 'human being'

Case	Singular	Dual	Plural
Agentive	*kwathasa	*kwathasax	*kwathasas
Objective	*kwathasam	*kwathasax	*kwathasas
Genitive	*kwathasasa	*kwathasawsa	*kwathasajsa
Partitive	*kwathasala	*kwathasawla	*kwathasajla
Dative	*kwathasana	*kwathasawna	*kwathasajna

Adjectives

Adjectives inflect like nouns if the noun they modify is animate, or the adjective is used as a head of an animate noun phrase. Degrees of comparison are marked by suffixes:

• Comparative *-isa
• Superlative *-istha
• Equative *-iskha

In these suffixes, the *i replaces the final vowel of the adjective, e.g. *makxa 'great' → *makhisa 'greater'.

Adverbs are derived from adjectives by suffixing *-s.

Pronouns

Pronouns exist in animate and inanimate forms (except, of course, 1st and 2nd person); they inflect like nouns.

Personal pronouns

The personal pronouns are:

• 1st person (exclusive): singular *mi, dual *mix, plural *mis
• 1st person (inclusive): dual *wix, plural *wis
• 2nd person: singular *thi, dual *thix, plural *this
• 3rd person: singular *sa, dual *sax, plural *sas
• Inanimate: *tatha

Reflexive pronouns

These are derived from the above by suffixing *-wa (before the number suffix).

Demonstrative pronouns

There are three degrees of deixis:

• Proximal (near speaker): *xa
• Medial (near hearer): *thxa
• Distal (far from both): *a

Interrogative pronouns

• Animate *khwa
• Inanimate *mana

Verbs

Verbs inflect for tense, mood and the person and number of the subject and, if transitive, the direct object.

There are two main classes of verbs: active verbs, which denote actions performed by the subject and may be transitive or intransitive; and stative verbs, which denote states or events happening to the non-acting subject and are always intransitive. These two classes use different personal suffixes, and mark their subjects with different cases. Active verbs require an animate subject in the agentive case; stative verbs require an animate subject in the objective case or an inanimate subject.

Tense and mood

The tense and mood suffixes are:

• Past *-na
• Future *-wa
• Subjunctive *-ja

The present indicative is unmarked. These suffixes are placed immediately after the verb stem and precede the personal suffixes. The subjunctive mood is not compatible with past and future tenses.

Personal suffixes

There are two sets of personal suffixes. The agentive suffixes are used for subjects of active verbs; the objective suffixes are used for direct objects of transitive verbs and for subjects of stative verbs. In a transitive verb, the objective suffix precedes the agentive suffix, e.g. *wali-tha-ma 'I love you'.

Agentive	Singular	Dual	Plural
1st person	*-ma	*-max	*-mas
2nd person	*-tha	*-thax	*-thas
3rd person	*-sa	*-sax	*-sas

Objective	Singular	Dual	Plural
1st person	*-xa	*-xax	*-xas
2nd person	*-thxa	*-thxax	*-thxas
3rd person	*-a	*-ax	*-as

A 3rd person objective suffix agrees with the number of the respective argument only if the argument is animate. With inanimate arguments, the 3rd person singular form *-a is always used.

Syntax

(to be done)

Lexicon

(to be done)