Collaborative conlang: Difference between revisions
Khemehekis (talk | contribs) (+Kalusa) |
Khemehekis (talk | contribs) (+Shaja) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
A '''collaborative language''', '''collablang''' or '''colllang''' (with triple l to avoid confusion with “[[conlang]]”) is a language constructed by a team of two or more people. Colllangs are the [[conlang]] analogy to [[Collaborative World|colworlds]] in [[conworld|world-building]]. | A '''collaborative language''', '''collablang''' or '''colllang''' (with triple l to avoid confusion with “[[conlang]]”) is a language constructed by a team of two or more people. Colllangs are the [[conlang]] analogy to [[Collaborative World|colworlds]] in [[conworld|world-building]]. | ||
Examples of colllangs include [[Ęndehl]], [[Jayus]], [[Sajem Tan]], [[Naeso]], [[Kalusa]], and [[Viossa]]. | Examples of colllangs include [[Ęndehl]], [[Jayus]], [[Sajem Tan]], [[Naeso]], [[Kalusa]], [[Shaja]], and [[Viossa]]. | ||
Historically, most colllangs have lasted only a few months before being abandoned by most of their collaborators. Some continue as solo projects with occasional contributions from others. Gary Shannon wrote an article for ''Fiat Lingua'' [http://fiatlingua.org/2012/09/ "Is a Collaborative Conlang Even Possible?"] on this subject. | Historically, most colllangs have lasted only a few months before being abandoned by most of their collaborators. Some continue as solo projects with occasional contributions from others. Gary Shannon wrote an article for ''Fiat Lingua'' [http://fiatlingua.org/2012/09/ "Is a Collaborative Conlang Even Possible?"] on this subject. | ||
Latest revision as of 04:38, 23 September 2020
A collaborative language, collablang or colllang (with triple l to avoid confusion with “conlang”) is a language constructed by a team of two or more people. Colllangs are the conlang analogy to colworlds in world-building.
Examples of colllangs include Ęndehl, Jayus, Sajem Tan, Naeso, Kalusa, Shaja, and Viossa.
Historically, most colllangs have lasted only a few months before being abandoned by most of their collaborators. Some continue as solo projects with occasional contributions from others. Gary Shannon wrote an article for Fiat Lingua "Is a Collaborative Conlang Even Possible?" on this subject.
| This article is part of a series on Types of Conlangs. "Reason" classification system: Artlangs * Funlangs * Engineered language * Philosophical language * Arithmographic language * Logical language * Fictional languages * Exolangs * Diachronic conlangs * Lostlangs * Altlangs * Auxlangs |
