Classical Arithide declension

From FrathWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
See also Classical Arithide grammar for more information


Owing to the language's inflectionary nature, Classical Arithide nouns, pronouns and certain of its adjectives must be declined (i.e. inflected) to provide grammatical meaning. A group of words that decline in the same way is known as a "declension class". There are 8 declension classes for nouns and the same for adjectives; pronouns are generally irregular.

Declension classes

Nouns in Classical Arithide are classed into different declensions based on their semantic meaning. This lexically based categorisation means that each declension class represents a broad group of nouns that share a certain characteristic. Traditional grammatical analysis takes the number of declension classes in Classical Arithide to be six, but the sub-classes that are sometimes sufficiently distinct from their ostensible parent class render the number about double. Factoring in overlapping and coincident declensions, modern grammarians generally accept the existence of 8 discrete groups, numbered declension classes I to VIII respectively. Only 7 classes were lexical: classes I to IV were productive classes due to their nature—they are still productive in Modern Arithide—and the nouns thence derived, which declined distinctly from their original classes, were categorised under an eighth class.

Nouns of the first declension ending in -os are associated lexically with abstractions: states (valonos "peace") and qualities (fugirenos "dangerousness"), as well as others (sonos "daily life"). The second declension ends in -as and is associated with places: kitaras "hall". The third (-ir) and fourth (-rir) both indicate a negative denotation or connotation associated with the noun, and were treated traditionally as variants of one declension, but separately nowadays because of the differences in their declension; they are also the only declensions where disyllabic nouns are stressed on the last syllable; vokir "evil", kirir "faux pas". The fifth declension consists of nouns ending in either -er or -a, and the association here is with people, society and culture: ither "person", medier "wife", steima "measurement"; nouns without an ending decline the same way but have no particular lexical association (stant "weight"). The sixth declension consists solely of nouns which all end in -on, e.g. pūron "hero" or foriton "miner", and the ending is productive in forming the agentive nouns of verbs. The seventh is made up of nouns ending in -i or -e, as well as certain nouns ending in -is and -es, but no apparent lexical connection has been found that sufficiently encompasses the nouns in the category. The eighth, and last, declension class comprises the derived nouns, ending in any of -os, -as or -ir, and is the most regular declension class due to its character: it is the only class in which no irregularity is observed in any individual noun.

Distinction between -er and -on

Both the nominative singular endings -er (V) and -on (VI) indicate people, or agents of verbs. While in surviving Classical Arithide texts only the latter seemed to be sufficiently lexemic to be productive (as the agentive noun-forming suffix, for one), there existed a semantic distinction between the two suffixes that persisted long enough for the -er ending to experience a resurgence in productivity in the vulgar tongue, and hence subsequently the koine and the modern standard.

The lexeme -on was straightforward: it simply denoted any person who committed any action, and could be freely attached to any verb due to its broad semantic scope:

  • segrēn "to write" > segron "one who writes, the person who wrote"
  • terēn "to weave" > teron "one who weaves, the person who wove"
  • damēn "to carry" > damon "one who carries, the person who carried"

-Er, on the other hand, was more restrictive: this suffix could be used only to denote such persons as professionals, passionate believers, or members of the family and so on. In other words, the action in question could not be a casual, one-off incidence, but had to be done by virtue of vocation, profession, conviction, or social role. Note the semantic contrast between the examples in the above paragraph and those that follow:

  • segrēn "to write" > segriter "author"
  • terēn "to weave" > teriter "tailor, seamstress"
  • damēn "to carry" > dampter "porter"

The above examples all include the infix -(i)t-, which is attached to frst conjugation verbs in the derivation of nouns one degree removed semantically from the verb, for more of which see Classical Arithide conjugation#Verbal nouns.

Irregular nominatives

A combination of phonetic processes, among which is notable syncope (the elimination of non-initial or -final word syllables), has given rise to many first declension nouns whose nominative singular forms do not end in the expected -os. In these nouns, the most common process has been the elision of the -o- in the ending; the resultant consonant clusters have each been resolved in a different way, at times through assimilation, at others through dissimilation, and in yet other cases triggering further elision. Note, however, that declension VIII nouns never undergo such reduction.

Examples are given below:

  • *-fos > -fs > -ps: kaps "list"1
  • *-tos > -ts > -ss > -s: ves "breeze"2
  • *-dos > -ds > -z > -s: as "sea"
  • *-ros > -rs > -s: aes "guard, custodian"3
  • *-egos, *-igos > -ēs, -īs: rēs "day", rīs "we (exclusive)"4
  • *-gos > -gs > -ks: rūthex "chairperson, president"5


1 In cases other than the nominative, the /f/ is generally voiced to [v], while retaining its spelling. Hence <kafo> [kavo] "list (acc.)". There are, coincidentally, no declension I nouns that end in -pos (except as part of a cluster), all of which having already been lenited to -fos in Ancient Arithide.
2 Note that the supines of second to fourth conjugation verbs (which are declension I and not VIII, unlike first conjugation supines), as well as the infix -it-, do not undergo this particular reduction due to the prominence of their -t- and their productivity.
3 This process, with r-stems, was considerably short-lived, and consequently affected only a limited number of words, leaving many others unaltered. Linguists postulate this to be the result of an overwhelming number of r-stem verbs (hence, r-stem declension VIII nouns) weighing in against the tendency to reduce.
4 Again, this process lost steam very quickly, and affected only the most commonly-used words.
5 This process applied only to the few agentive nouns borrowed from the Dethric.

These reductive processes only kicked in when the consonants mentioned above were in isolation, i.e. they did not occur as part of a cluster. In addition, the behaviour of the vowels immediately before the affected consonants exhibits a degree of variation that is not entirely regular or predictable. While much of the time they remain unchanged, in certain nouns the high vowels [i] and [u] may be lowered to [e] and [o] (which was not reflected in the standard orthography but gleaned from informal correspondences and writings).

Most problematically, for reasons of stress and hence scansion, they might sometimes be lengthened. Vowel-lengthening in orathōs < *orathodos "religious" is logical, partly because the reduction involves the coalescence of two [o]s, and partly for reasons of contrast with plain orathos "religion". However, the adjectival substantive ending -itās has the stem -itat-, and the stem of dhīs "festival" is actually dhid-. The occurrence of -ā- and -ī- in these cases appears to be entirely arbitrary, especially given the precedents of words like das, dad- "hand" that do not undergo compensatory lengthening.

Grammatical cases

Fully declining a noun requires expressing its 11 cases:

  • Nominative, which marks the subject of a verb; the nominative is the case in which a noun or pronoun is cited in the dictionary, hence it is also known as the citation case
  • Topical, which marks the topic of a sentence
  • Accusative, which marks the object of a verb
  • Genitive, which marks possession by
  • Dative, which marks motion towards, and by extension benefaction to etc.
  • Locative, which marks location (with places) or indicates shift of grammatical focus (with objects and people)
  • Ablative, which marks motion away or existence apart, and by extension is used with prepositions such as parō "about, regarding" or etel "by (agentive)"
  • Instrumental, which marks instruments, and by extension accompaniment, using the preposition etel "with"
  • Vocative, which marks direct address
  • Connective, which is an open-ended stem form to which certain affixes or other nouns are appended, e.g. salumos "heaven" + innos "top" > saluminnum "in heaven" (lit. "on heaven"; innos is in the locative) and allas "city" + dolō "around" (from dolos "surroundings") > alladolō "around the city" 1
  • Essive, which marks existence as

1

Alladolō (connective + prep.) must be distinguished from the similar dolō allior (prep. + ablative); while both might be translated as "around the city", the former refers to the areas outside and surrounding a certain city, while the latter refers to places all around within the city: alladolō siethē sena "there are flowers around the city" vs. dolō allior siethē sena "there are flowers all about the city".

Of these, the connective and essive cases in all nouns are identical, resulting in 10 effective cases. Should the need arise to differentiate the two, however, the essive may take on the auxiliary suffix -sanos (lit. "semblance, condition, state").

First declension -os

Nouns of and adjectives in the first declension take the following endings:

sg. pl.
Nom. -os or - -ēs
Top. -ou -ōi
Acc. -o
Gen. -en, -ne1 -enē(s)2
Dat. -ae -ei
Loc. -ira -erē
Abl. -ōn -ēn
Ins. -itis -itēs
Voc.
Ess./Con. - -er, -er-

1 The former -en is used with consonant-stem words (e.g. sōmos, sōm-), while the latter with vowel-stem words (e.g. thiftios, thifti-).

2 The final -s is optional, but tends to be used in more formal speech, and all writing (except in imitations of speech or transcriptions).

A sample declension with the noun sōmos are given below:

sg. pl.
Nom. sōmos sōmēs
Top. sōmou sōmōi
Acc. sōmo sōmē
Gen. sōmen sōmenē(s)
Dat. sōmae sōmei
Loc. sōmira sōmerē
Abl. sōmōn sōmēn
Ins. sōmitis sōmitēs
Voc. sōmō sōmē
Ess./Con. sōm, sōm- sōmer, sōmer-

Second declension -as

Second declension nouns take the following endings:

sg. pl.
Nom. -as -ae
Top. -ai -ēi
Acc. -a
Gen. -an -anē(s)1
Dat. -is2 -ēs
Loc. -um -ām
Abl. -ior3 -ēri
Ins. -atis -etēs
Voc.
Ess./Con. -a, -a- -ē, -ē-

1 The final -s is optional, but tends to be used in more formal speech, and all writing (except in imitations of speech or transcriptions).

2 With -i- stem words, the coagulation of the -i- in the noun stem and that in the ending gives rise to a resultant long ī.

3 In this case the -i- in the case ending is elided.

Unlike the first declension, nouns of the second declension do not distinguish endings between consonant- and vowel-stem words. An example conjugation is provided with sivias "town" below.

sg. pl.
Nom. sivias siviae
Top. siviai siviēi
Acc. sivia siviē
Gen. sivian sivianē(s)
Dat. sivīs1 siviēs
Loc. sivium siviām
Abl. sivior2 siviēri
Ins. siviatis sivietēs
Voc. siviā siviē
Ess./Con. sivia, sivia- siviē, siviē-

1 The long ī derives from the coagulation of the -i- in the noun stem and that in the ending.

2 In this case the -i- in the case ending is elided.

Third declension -ir

The important distinction between nouns that end in the simpler -ir and more complex -rir endings (declensions III and IV respectively) must be maintained for purposes of proper declension. Third declension nouns form their stems differently (in many cases with the retention of the -ir ending), and take endings that vary markedly from those of the fourth declension.

The endings for the third declension are:

sg. pl.
Nom. -ir -idēs
Top. -u, -irou1 -idōi
Acc. -i, -u1 -idē
Gen. -uris -idis
Dat. -irae -idei
Loc. -irum -idēm
Abl. -irōn -idēn
Ins. -iritis -iditēs
Voc. -idē
Ess./Con. -ir, -ir- -id, -id-

1 The first and second forms of the topical and accusative case endings are mutually exclusive alternatives; the distribution is relatively even among the surviving texts. I.e. in using voku for the topical case, the accusative must take -i; in using voku for the accusative, the topical case will fall as vokirou.

An example noun is vokir, declined as follows:

sg. pl.
Nom. vokir vokidēs
Top. voku, vokirou vokidōi
Acc. voki, voku vokidē
Gen. vokuris vokidis
Dat. vokirae vokidei
Loc. vokirum vokidēm
Abl. vokirōn vokidēn
Ins. vokiritis vokiditēs
Voc. vokū vokidē
Ess./Con. vokir, vokir- vokid, vokid-

Fourth declension -rir

In the fourth declension, nouns decline like so:

sg. pl.
Nom. -ir -idēs
Top. -u, -udou1 -idōi
Acc. -i, -u1 -idē
Gen. -in(i)2 -idinē(s)2
Dat. -is -idis
Loc. -um -idēm
Abl. -ior -ēri
Ins. -utis -iditēs
Voc. -idē
Ess./Con. -ud, -ud- -id, -id-

1 The first and second forms of the topical and accusative case endings are mutually exclusive alternatives; the distribution is relatively even among the surviving texts.

2 The final -i of the genitive singular is optional.

3 The final -s of the genitive plural is usually optional, but required in formal situations.

Kirir is declined as follows:

sg. pl.
Nom. kirir kiridēs
Top. kiru, kirudou kiridōi
Acc. kiri, kiru kiridē
Gen. kirin(i) kiridinē(s)
Dat. kiris kiridis
Loc. kirum kiridēm
Abl. kirior kirēri
Ins. kirutis kiriditēs
Voc. kirū kiridē
Ess./Con. kirud, kirud- kirid, kirid-

Fifth declension -er and -a etc.

The groups of nouns in the fifth declension decline in generally the same way, albeit with minor differences.

sg. pl. sg. pl.
Nom. -er -eis -a -eis
Top. -ai -ōi, -ēi1 -ai -ōi, -ēi1
Acc. -or -ei -or -ei
Gen. -us -itus, -isus1 -us -ētus, -ēsus1
Dat. -ae -ēs -ae -ēs
Loc. -era -ērē -era -ērē
Abl. -ōn -ēn -ōn -ēn
Ins. -etis -itēs -etis -ētēs
Voc.
Ess./Con. -e, -e- -i, -i- -a, -a- -ē, -ē-

1 Either form is perfectly acceptable.

Theler, steima and stant are declined as examples below:

sg. pl. sg. pl. sg. pl.
Nom. theler theleis steima steimeis stant stanteis
Top. thelai thelōi, thelēi steimai steimōi, steimēi stantai stantōi, stantēi
Acc. thelor thelei steimor steimei stantor stantei
Gen. thelus thelitus, thelisus steimus steimētus, steimēsus stantus stantitus, stantisus
Dat. thelae thelēs steimae steimēs stantae stantēs
Loc. thelera thelērē steimera steimērē stantera stantērē
Abl. thelōn thelēn steimōn steimēn stantōn stantēn
Ins. theletis thelitēs steimetis steimētēs stantetis stantitēs
Voc. thelā thelī steimā steimē stantā stantī
Ess./Con. thele, thele- theli, theli- steima, steima- steimē, steimē- stante, stante- stanti, stanti-

Sixth declension -on

The sixth declension is the only class of nouns that has variant stems: in the plural, the -on (which is actually part of the stem; the class marker is a null morpheme) fronts to become -ēn-.

Sixth declension nouns decline as per the table below:

sg. pl.
Nom. -(on) -(ens, ēnes)1
Top. -a -a
Acc.
Gen. -us -us
Dat. -ae -ēs
Loc. -era -erē
Abl. -ōn -ēn
Ins. -etis -etēs
Voc.
Ess./Con. - -

1 The form agnēns is a contraction of the older agnēnes; the former is more often seen in later texts, but the latter remains widespread and the standard for formal and serious topics.

Thus agnon has a declension of:

sg. pl.
Nom. agnon agnens/-nēnes
Top. agnona agnēna
Acc. agnonē agnēnē
Gen. agnonus agnēnus
Dat. agnonae agnēnēs
Loc. agnonera agnēnerē
Abl. agnonōn agnēnēn
Ins. agnonetis agnēnetēs
Voc. agnonā agnēnā
Ess./Con. agnon, agnon- agnēn, agnēn-

Seventh declension -i, -e, -is, -es

The seventh declension takes the following endings:

sg. pl.
Nom. -i etc. -īs
Top. -us -utē
Acc. -ēs -ētē
Gen. -is -itē
Dat. -e -erei
Loc. -ira -ērē
Abl. -igōn -egēn
Ins. -itis -ētēs
Voc. -i etc.
Ess./Con. -ī, -ī- -ē, -ē-

Below is the example declension for vosi:

sg. pl.
Nom. vosi vosīs
Top. vosus vosutē
Acc. vosēs vosētē
Gen. vosis vositē
Dat. vose voserei
Loc. vosira vosērē
Abl. vosigōn vosegēn
Ins. vositis vosētēs
Voc. vosi vosē
Ess./Con. vosi, vosi- vosē, vosē-

Eighth declension -os, -as, -ir

The derived nouns of the eighth declension take endings as follows in the table below. One peculiarity of these derived nouns is that they form all cases by appending the relevant case ending to their connective, as will be demonstrated by the example conjugations table further down; in -ir nouns, only the singular connective is used, except where the case endings are identical for the singular and plural, when the plural connective is also used. For this declension, the genitive, dative, locative, ablative and instrumental cases have identical endings for all three classes of nouns.

sg. pl. sg. pl. sg. pl.
Nom. -os -ēs -as -ae -ir -rēs
Top. -ou -ōi -ai -ōi -ou -ōi
Acc. -o -a -o
Gen. -is -ēs -is -ēs -is -is
Dat. -ae -ei -ae -ei -ae -ei
Loc. -um -um -um -um -um -um
Abl. -ōn -ēn -ōn -ēn -ōn -ēn
Ins.1 -sis -sēs -sis -sēs -sis -sēs
Voc. -ērā
Ess./Con. -ōr, -or- -ēr, -er- -ār, -ar- -aes, -aer- -ir, -r- -rēr, -rēr-

1 The only exception to the rule, where case endgings are affixed directly to the stem rather than the connective, is the instrumental case. This has a historical explanation: In the long words that resulted, the interposing vowel between the final -r of the connective and the subsequent -t- of the instrumental ending elided, giving rise to a -rt- cluster, which was subsequently fricativised to -st- (as is attested elsewhere in the language), then -ss-, and finally -s-.

Vagos, lydas and syndir are declined as examples below:

sg. pl. sg. pl. sg. pl.
Nom. vagos vagēs lydas lydae syndir syndrēs
Top. vagorou vagerōi lydarai lydaerōi syndrou syndrōi
Acc. vagoro vagerē lydara lydaerē syndro syndrē
Gen. vagoris vagerēs lydaris lydaerēs syndris syndrēris
Dat. vagorae vagerei lydarae lydaerei syndrae syndrei
Loc. vagorum vagerum lydarum lydaerum syndrum syndrērum
Abl. vagorōn vagerēn lydarōn lydaerēn syndrōn syndrēn
Ins. vagosis vagesēs lydasis lydaesēs syndsis1 syndsēs1
Voc. vagorā vagerā, vagerē lydarā lydaerē syndrā syndrērā
Ess./Con. vagōr, vagor- vagēr, vager- lydār, lydar- lydaes, lydaer- syndir, syndr- syndrēr, syndrēr-

1 The combination of the -d- in the stem and the s- in the ending give the resultant pronunciation of -z-.

Irregular nouns

Main article: List of Classical Arithide irregular nouns

As with all languages, Classical Arithide has its share of irregularly-declined nouns, some of them being among the most commonly used. In addition to that, most personal names in Classical Arithide are irregularly declined (e.g. Pereos, gen. Fini; Symbakos, voc. Sebeō). See also Areth names#Classical for more on personal name declensions.

See also