Philosophical language: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A '''philosophical language''' is an [[engineered language]] which attempts to implement some kind of philosophical idea. | A '''philosophical language''' is an [[engineered language]] which attempts to implement some kind of philosophical idea. | ||
==Types of Philosophical languages== | |||
===Taxonomic languages=== | |||
Some of the more common philosophical languages are [[a priori]] conlangs with vocabulary based on a general taxonomy of ideas (and are called Taxonomic Languages). Words are derived from more general words. For example, 'cat' would be a derivative of 'mammal' (perhaps with a few levels in between) which would be a derivative of 'animal', etc. While this works well with some fields of discourse where a natural taxonomy exists (as in the 'cat' example above), it fails in most others where any taxonomy remains arbitrary. Philosophical languages also suffer from the problem that words with similar meaning are also very similar in form, which can lead to misunderstandings. | |||
An interesting variation of this approach is the [[arithmographic language]], as first envisioned by Leibniz. | An interesting variation of this approach is the [[arithmographic language]], as first envisioned by Leibniz. | ||
===Other Philosophical languages=== | |||
Taxonomic languages can also be based around a particular life philosophy- such as [[Toki pona]], which is based upon Daoist principles, teaches that simplicity is good, and makes expressing complicated things difficult so as to discourage them. | |||
Philosophical languages were most popular in the 17th century, but some were designed later - up until even the present day. | Philosophical languages were most popular in the 17th century, but some were designed later - up until even the present day. | ||
Revision as of 11:10, 14 January 2012
A philosophical language is an engineered language which attempts to implement some kind of philosophical idea.
Types of Philosophical languages
Taxonomic languages
Some of the more common philosophical languages are a priori conlangs with vocabulary based on a general taxonomy of ideas (and are called Taxonomic Languages). Words are derived from more general words. For example, 'cat' would be a derivative of 'mammal' (perhaps with a few levels in between) which would be a derivative of 'animal', etc. While this works well with some fields of discourse where a natural taxonomy exists (as in the 'cat' example above), it fails in most others where any taxonomy remains arbitrary. Philosophical languages also suffer from the problem that words with similar meaning are also very similar in form, which can lead to misunderstandings.
An interesting variation of this approach is the arithmographic language, as first envisioned by Leibniz.
Other Philosophical languages
Taxonomic languages can also be based around a particular life philosophy- such as Toki pona, which is based upon Daoist principles, teaches that simplicity is good, and makes expressing complicated things difficult so as to discourage them.
Philosophical languages were most popular in the 17th century, but some were designed later - up until even the present day.
Some philosophical languages
For a full list of philosophical languages which have pages on FrathWiki, please click here.
17th century
- Ars signorum (1661) by George Dalgarno
- An Essay towards a Real Character (1668) by John Wilkins
- Characteristica universalis by Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz
Modern times
| This article is part of a series on Types of Conlangs. "Reason" classification system: Artlangs * Funlangs * Engineered language * Philosophical language * Arithmographic language * Logical language * Fictional languages * Exolangs * Diachronic conlangs * Lostlangs * Altlangs * Auxlangs |
| This article is part of a series on Engineered languages. Arithmographic languages: Characteristica universalis |
