Av (Arithide): Difference between revisions

From FrathWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
In [[Arithide language|Arithide]], whether [[Classical Arithide|classical]] or [[Modern Arithide|modern]], the lexeme '''av''' is used almost universally in negation, and surfaces in various forms: standalone particle, prefix and suffix. While dialects may differ as to the exact quality of the vowel—some have ''-e-'', others ''-o-'', others a schwa, and still others a variable vowel identical to the previous or next vowel, depending on whether the negation is prefixal or suffixal—the consonant is in all cases the voiced labiodental fricative.
In [[Arithide language|Arithide]], whether [[Classical Arithide|classical]] or [[Modern Arithide|modern]], the lexeme '''av''' is used almost universally in negation, and surfaces in various forms: standalone particle, prefix and suffix. While dialects may differ as to the exact quality of the vowel—some have ''-e-'', others ''-o-'', others a schwa, and still others a variable vowel identical to the previous or next vowel, depending on whether the negation is prefixal or suffixal—the consonant is in all cases the voiced labiodental fricative.


==Early Arithide==
==Classical Arithide==


==Classical Arithide==
In [[Classical Arithide]], ''av'' was a flexible suffix, attaching not only to verbs, but also to nouns in negation, expressing by its mere position the negation of different elements in a sentence. Thus, for example, the sentence ''izō nosum surit'' "(He) stole the money yesterday" has the following negations:
 
#''Izō nosum surit'''''av'''''.''<br>money.ACC yesterday.LOC steal.PAST.NEG<br>'''Regular verbal negation.''' This sentence is almost as ambiguous as the English, except that it is unambiguous that the money was involved, whereas in English appropriate emphasis could cast doubt even on that.<br><br>
#''Izō nosum '''''av'''''surit.''<br>money.ACC yesterday.LOC NEG.steal.PAST<br>'''Lexical verbal negation.''' This sentence translates to English "(He) didn't steal the money yesterday", but unlike the English, which could plausibly be negating anything from the stealing to what was stolen to when it was stolen, in the Arithide the sentence's semantic scope is significantly narrower: it only means that what was done with the money was not stealing; he could have borrowed the money, put it in a safe, or burnt it. In this case the adverb ''nosum'' "yesterday" functions differently from the English, and would be interpreted to mean, loosely, "yesterday's money".<br><br>
#'''Av'''''izō nosum surit.''<br>NEG.money.ACC yesterday.LOC steal.PAST<br>'''Nominal (object) negation.''' I.e. "It wasn't the ''money'' that (he) stole yesterday." Something else was stolen yesterday, by him. Perhaps he did steal the money as well, but that wasn't done yesterday, and whether he did or not is not important. The emphasis here is on what was stolen yesterday, and that it wasn't the money; see also (5).<br><br>
#'''Av'''''na izō nosum surit.''<br>NEG.pron-3p-sg money.ACC yesterday.LOC steal.PAST<br>'''Nominal (subject) negation.''' "It wasn't (him) who stole the money yesterday." Someone else stole the money yesterday. The additional pronoun is necessary here for disambiguation; other sentences omit the pronoun ([[Classical Arithide]] is pro-drop; see [[Classical Arithide grammar]]).<br><br>
#''Izō '''''av'''''nosum surit.''<br>money.ACC NEG.yesterday.LOC steal.PAST<br>'''Adverbial negation.''' "It wasn't yesterday that (he) stole the money." He did indeed steal the money, but it wasn't yesterday; he had stolen it some time else, perhaps minutes ago. In contrast to (3), this construction is generally interpreted to mean that he did not steal anything else, but again the fact is not usually important.


==Modern Arithide==
==Modern Arithide==
''Av'' in [[Modern Arithide]] is a verbal affix,


{{stub}}
{{stub}}
==See also==
*[[Classical Arithide]]
*[[Classical Arithide grammar]]
*[[Classical Arithide conjugation]], especially [[Classical Arithide conjugation#Negation]] for the two types of verbal negation.


[[Category: Ilethes]]
[[Category: Ilethes]]

Revision as of 22:27, 18 August 2007

In Arithide, whether classical or modern, the lexeme av is used almost universally in negation, and surfaces in various forms: standalone particle, prefix and suffix. While dialects may differ as to the exact quality of the vowel—some have -e-, others -o-, others a schwa, and still others a variable vowel identical to the previous or next vowel, depending on whether the negation is prefixal or suffixal—the consonant is in all cases the voiced labiodental fricative.

Classical Arithide

In Classical Arithide, av was a flexible suffix, attaching not only to verbs, but also to nouns in negation, expressing by its mere position the negation of different elements in a sentence. Thus, for example, the sentence izō nosum surit "(He) stole the money yesterday" has the following negations:

  1. Izō nosum suritav.
    money.ACC yesterday.LOC steal.PAST.NEG
    Regular verbal negation. This sentence is almost as ambiguous as the English, except that it is unambiguous that the money was involved, whereas in English appropriate emphasis could cast doubt even on that.

  2. Izō nosum avsurit.
    money.ACC yesterday.LOC NEG.steal.PAST
    Lexical verbal negation. This sentence translates to English "(He) didn't steal the money yesterday", but unlike the English, which could plausibly be negating anything from the stealing to what was stolen to when it was stolen, in the Arithide the sentence's semantic scope is significantly narrower: it only means that what was done with the money was not stealing; he could have borrowed the money, put it in a safe, or burnt it. In this case the adverb nosum "yesterday" functions differently from the English, and would be interpreted to mean, loosely, "yesterday's money".

  3. Avizō nosum surit.
    NEG.money.ACC yesterday.LOC steal.PAST
    Nominal (object) negation. I.e. "It wasn't the money that (he) stole yesterday." Something else was stolen yesterday, by him. Perhaps he did steal the money as well, but that wasn't done yesterday, and whether he did or not is not important. The emphasis here is on what was stolen yesterday, and that it wasn't the money; see also (5).

  4. Avna izō nosum surit.
    NEG.pron-3p-sg money.ACC yesterday.LOC steal.PAST
    Nominal (subject) negation. "It wasn't (him) who stole the money yesterday." Someone else stole the money yesterday. The additional pronoun is necessary here for disambiguation; other sentences omit the pronoun (Classical Arithide is pro-drop; see Classical Arithide grammar).

  5. Izō avnosum surit.
    money.ACC NEG.yesterday.LOC steal.PAST
    Adverbial negation. "It wasn't yesterday that (he) stole the money." He did indeed steal the money, but it wasn't yesterday; he had stolen it some time else, perhaps minutes ago. In contrast to (3), this construction is generally interpreted to mean that he did not steal anything else, but again the fact is not usually important.

Modern Arithide

Av in Modern Arithide is a verbal affix,

This article is a stub. If you can contribute to its content, feel free to do so.

See also