Classical Arithide conjugation: Difference between revisions

From FrathWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 225: Line 225:
| style="width: 125px" | bal'''et''', bal'''ed-'''
| style="width: 125px" | bal'''et''', bal'''ed-'''
| style="width: 125px" | bal'''ēth'''
| style="width: 125px" | bal'''ēth'''
| style="width: 125px" | bal'''etha'''
| style="width: 125px" | bal'''eth'''
|-
|-
| style="width: 125px" | bal'''ean''', bal'''eam-'''
| style="width: 125px" | bal'''ean''', bal'''eam-'''

Revision as of 22:45, 20 April 2007

See also Classical Arithide grammar for more information


Classical Arithide verbs are divided into four conjugations based on their stems: whether they end in the vowels -a, -e, -i or a consonant. Whereas all consonant-stem verbs (C-verbs) take -ēn in the infinitive, vowel-stem verbs (V-verbs) double their stem-final vowel and add -n to form the infinitive. The two conjugations differ in their basic finite forms, whereas additional affixes for the various aspects and moods are common; a small group of verbs are mixed-conjugation: though consonant-stem, they take vowel-stem conjugations.

Within the C-verb class, nasal-stems (-m- and -n-) conjugate slightly differently from the non-nasal-stem verbs; also, V-verbs possess a second stem, with which are formed their derivatives, such as the protractive aspect and the agentive noun.

Verbs in each class are conjugated for four voices, three basic aspects, five derivative aspects, seven moods and four tenses, on a cascading hierarchy as above. I.e., to the root form of the verb would first be appended affixes indicating voice, followed by aspect, then mood and subsequently tense. Certain aspects and moods in Classical Arithide form separate infinitives from the main verb, but, as semi-independent verbs, are not always able to take the full range of verb conjugations.

There is a small class of antideponent verbs in Classical Arithide, i.e. verbs with an active form but a passive meaning.

Conjugations of an Arithide verb

The basic conjugations of an Arithide verb are given in table format as laid out in the following template.

verb stem, gerund, imperative, cohortative
potentive, causative, passive
supine
location
instrument
agent
patient
perfect aspect perfect participle present tense
perfective aspect perfective participle past tense
imperfective aspect imperfective participle -
(conditional mood) (conditional participle) future tense
habitual, inceptive, frequentative, protractive
desiderative, jussive, subjunctive

Stem & gerund

The conjugation of a verb is conducted with its stem as the basis. To find the stem of a consonant-stem verb, simply remove the infinitive ending -ēn; vowel-stem verbs display their inherent vowel in the infinitive: a-stems have -ān, e-stems have -ēn and i-stems have -iān. From the stem is formed the second major part of a verb's conjugation, the gerund: C-verbs affix an -o directly onto the stem, hence napsēn "to hide" has the stem naps- and the gerund napso; V-verbs, on the other hand, append it to the derivative stem, hence sebiān "to hear" has the gerund form sebito. Most complex conjugations are formed using the gerund, as are a number of common verbal phrases and periphrastic constructions; frequently, when those conjugations require an affix beginning with a vowel, the -o of the gerund is elided.

Verbal nouns

The left side of the table, shaded slightly darker, lists the main verbal nouns, of agency (doer), of patiency (done to), of instrument (tool), of location (place done at), as well as the supine (act of). Agentive nouns are of declension VI and instrumentive nouns are declension Vb, the patientive is declension VII, while locative nouns as well as the supine are of declension VIII (see Classical Arithide declension for the respective inflection patterns).

Imperative & cohortative

At the top-right of the table, listed with the stem and the gerund, are the imperative ("walk!") and the cohortative ("let's walk") moods respectively. These are the only two forms of the verb that are progressively invariable (see Progressive inflection), i.e. they do not inflect further for the next level of time-flow distinction, in this case tense. The imperative is formed with V-verbs by lengthening their inherent vowel and adding -ra, and with C-verbs by adding -ēra to the stem (i.e. napsēn > napsēra, kalān > kalāra, sebiān > sebīra). The cohortative is constructed, in C-verbs by appending -ōra to the stem; V-verbs lengthen the final -o in their gerundive and add -ra. In colloquial speech or for purposes of scansion, the final -ra may be omitted for both these moods.

Free derivatives

Under them are listed the only three derivative verbs that can conjugate nearly as fully as the main verb itself, with only minimal restrictions (the "free derivatives"): the potentive (-ābēn), causative (-ārēn) and passive (-stēn) voices.

To illustrate, napsābēn (napso- + -ābēn potentive) can take any ending that the main verb can, except the passive, because potentive verbs are intransitive by nature and thus do not have a passive; nor can napsostēn (napso- + -stēn passive), for the same reason that passive verbs are also intransitive by definition; in addition, the causative is the only derivative of the three that allows recursion: napsārāre "made to cause to hide" is semantically permissible, whereas napsābābēn is illogical and napsostostēn is forbidden for transitivity reasons as already discussed.

Of these, the passive verb is constructed in certain regards somewhat differently from its active counterpart.

  1. The imperative is conjugated -ura—i.e. napsostura not *napsostēra
  2. The cohortative is conjugated -ulla—i.e. napsostulla not *napsostōra
  3. There is a third-person imperative ("let him hide") ending in -sit—i.e. napsosit

Records of earlier Arithide show the passive form as originally having been constructed -sitēn, which casts some light on the origins of the seemingly irregular third-person imperative, and the patientive verbal noun. The latter is attested as once regular (napsositos, which phonetic attrition reduced), and the former of which is unattested but postulated by scholars to have been napsositu, paralleling the imperative and cohortative. For those moods, however, no material is available to explain their distinct construction from the active.

Aspects & tenses

The table is ordered with the aspects preceding what is, in Classical Arithide grammar, traditionally known as the four basic tenses, for reasons of origin: the tenses ultimately derive from reduced versions of the aspects; written records exhibit tenses only from the fifth century BCIE. The perfect aspect gave rise to the present tense, the perfective to the past tense, and the once-common conditional mood decayed into the future tense, in a logical process of mapping, in the early decades of the establishment of the Lazeian Empire.

See also Development of Classical Arithide tenses for more information


With the development of the tenses, finer temporal distinctions became possible, and the aspects evolved from finite verb forms to dually functioning affixes: they could stand alone without tense-marking, or, as with many Indo-European languages, they could act as aspectual stems and take tenses. This overlapping feature of the aspect was often utilised in literature, as well as politics, for reasons of style, emphasis, or deliberate ambiguity.

The participles of the various aspects and the conditional mood serve two main purposes. First, due to the SOV syntax of Classical Arithide, verbs were used prenominally as modifiers. Initially these modifier verbs used the same forms as final verbs, but gradually evolved distinct forms with lengthened vowels and, in the case of the imperfective, lost the accompanying consonant. Adjectives of the verbal class, however, did not undergo this change (see Classical Arithide adjectives). Second, analogously to the Latin ablative absolute construction, the participles could indicate the context of a main sentence, e.g.

  • Kodhē roimeūm, sōpeda tholorae ivage. Having weakened the enemy, the soldiers went in for the kill.

Limited derivatives

The "limited derivative" verbs are, as opposed to the free derivatives, independent derivative verbs that may not take the full range of conjugations. Most derivatives in this category are modal: the inceptive mood (-senēn "to begin to"), the frequentative (-vasēn "to do repeatedly"), the protractive (-tamēn "to go on and on"), the desiderative (-ssēn "to want to"), the jussive (-spēn "to want the listener to") and the subjunctive (-ōnēn). The first three moods take the imperfective stem; the latter three take the gerundive stem with C-verbs and the basic stem with V-verbs. None of these verbs may take a subordinate voice (as they are moods), nor recur (i.e. napsisenisenēn, for example, is not permissible); all may take the inceptive and the subjunctive subordinately, and the inceptive may take the frequentative in subordination.

Also part of the limited derivatives are the progressively invariable habitual and perfective habitual aspects, which are conjugated like tenses, by taking the imperfective stem, affixing -mnēn, and conjugating it with the present or past tense respectively. The simple habitual (with the present-tense ending) also doubles as the generic mood, to express universals.

Negation

In Classical Arithide, as with its modern descendant, there are two possible ways of constructing negation—broad and narrow—using the affixes av- and -va respectively. Broad negation negates the semantic meaning of an entire word, phrase, or even sentence; the narrow variant negates only the specific conjugated meaning of the verb.

Compare the following two sentences and the nuanced difference in their meaning:

  • Vagēn raenābava. You cannot choose to go. (lit. "to-go choose-can-not")
  • Vagēn avraenāba. You can not choose to go. or You can choose not to go. (lit. "to-go not-choose-can")
  • Avvagēn raenāba. You can choose not to go. (lit. "not-to-go choose-can")

The former sentence is an example of narrow negation, because the negative suffix applies only to the conjugated verb, i.e. it refers to the narrow act of not presently wanting to be sick; the latter of broad, because the prefix inverts the lexical meaning of the verb, and subsequent conjugations modify the prefixed verb as a single unit of negative meaning—the new word is technically considered grammatically affirmative.

Certain constructions require the use of either of the negatives over the other due to grammatical constraints, e.g. in the case of the following two sentences:

  1. Sit iter avvagōna do, vagae. If that person is not going, I will go.
  2. Sit iter vagōna do, vagaeva. If that person is going, I will not go.
  3. Sit iter avvagospa. He does not want that person to go. (Lit. "he desires the person to not-go")
  4. Sit iter vagospava. He does not want that person to go. (Lit. "he desires not the person to go")

In the first sentence the broad negative has to be employed due to the overlap in the various functions of the subjunctive mood, which here is used as a "subjunctive of condition": if it were said Sit iter vagōnava..., it would imply a separate grammatical topic (e.g. dās "I", nās "he" etc.) and that the subjunctive is being used as a "subjunctive of desire", i.e. the clause would mean, instead, the equivalent of sentence (4).

First conjugation: Consonant-stem verbs

The first conjugation, containing all consonant-stem verbs, is the most common conjugation to which verbs in Classical Arithide belong, encompassing approximately three-quarters of all verbs. The regular conjugation is illustrated by the example verbs sernēn "to order" and evtēn "to show" below. Note the different way in which the conditional mood and future tense are formed for verbs with stems ending in nasals:

SERNĒN sern-, serno, sernēra, sernōra
sernābēn, sernārēn, sernostēn
sup. sernos
loc. sernas
ins. serneta
agt. sernon, sernter
pat. sernosis
sernat, sernat- sernāt(a) serna
sernen, sernem- sernēm(a) serne
sernis, sernir- sernī(m)
(sernauer, sernauer-) (sernauē) sernae
sernimnēn, sernisenēn, sernivasēn, sernitamēn
sernossēn, sernospēn, sernōnēn


EVTĒN evt-, evto, evtēra, evtōra
evtābēn, evtārēn, evtostēn
sup. evtos
loc. evtas
ins. evteta
agt. evton, evtoter
pat. evtosis
evtat, evtat- evtāt(a) evta
evten, evtem- evtēm(a) evte
evtis, evtir- evtī(m)
(evtont, evtond-) (evtōn(a)) evton
evtimnēn, evtisenēn, evtivasēn, evtitamēn
evtossēn, evtospēn, evtōnēn

-mēn verbs

Verbs whose stems end in -m take a slightly different ending in the perfective aspect, which has arisen due to historical phonetic dissimulation. Also, the agentive verbal noun takes an epenthetic -p-. To illustrate, the conjugation of the verb damēn "to carry" is provided below.

DAMĒN dam-, damo, damēra, damōra
damābēn, damārēn, damostēn
sup. damos
loc. damas
ins. dameta
agt. damon (dampter)
pat. damosis
damat, damat- damāt(a) dama
dameum, dameun- dameūm(a) dame
damis, damir- damī(n)
(damauer, damauer-) (damauē) damae
damimne/damamne, damisenēn, damivasēn, damitamēn
damossēn, damospēn, damōnēn

Second conjugation: a-stem verbs

The regular conjugation for a-stem verbs is given below with the example kalān "to give". sebiān "to pull".

KALĀN kala-, kala, kalāra, kalatōra
kalābēn, kalārēn, kalastēn
sup. kalatos
loc. kalatas
ins. kalateta
agt. kalaton (kalater)
pat. kalasis
kalas, kalar- kalant kalas
kalet, kaled- kalēth kaleth
kalin, kalam- kalīm
(kalōn, kalum-) (kalōn) kalōn
kalamnēn, kalasenēn, kalavasēn, kalatamēn
kalassēn, kalaspēn, kalatōnēn

Third conjugation: e-stem verbs

The regular conjugation for a-stem verbs is given below with the example balēn "to be able (to)".

BALĒN1 bale-, bale, balēra, baletōra
baleābēn, baleārēn, balestēn
sup. baletos
loc. baletas
ins. baleteta
agt. baleton (baleter)
pat. balesis
bales, baler- balent bales
balet, baled- balēth baleth
balean, baleam- balean
(baleōn, baleum-) (baleōn) baleōn
balimnēn, balisenēn, balivasēn, balitamēn
balessēn, balespēn, baletōnēn

Fourth conjugation: i-stem verbs

The regular conjugation for a-stem verbs is given below with the example sebiān "to pull".

SEBIĀN sebi-, sebito, seb'īra, sebitōra
sebitābēn, sebiārēn, sebitostēn
sup. sebitos
loc. sebitas
ins. sebiteta
agt. sebiton (sebiter)
pat. sebitosis
sebis, sebir- sebint sebis
sebiet, sebied- sebiēth sebieth
sebian, sebiam- sebian
(sebiōn, sebium-) (sebiōn) sebiōn
sebimnēn, sebisenēn, sebivasēn, sebitamēn
sebissēn, sebispēn, sebitōnēn

Deriving other parts of speech

Like many other SOV languages, most notably Japanese, Classical Arithide could turn its verbs into modifiers simply by putting them directly before the noun they modify, e.g. ores solen "the river flows" vs. solen ores "the flowing river" "the river that flows". However, due to the language's extensive and growing inflection, and consequently considerably free word order, the practice declined rather early on in the Lazeian Empire's existence in favour of the rising participle forms, which had already begun to differentiate before the conquest of Galaria; it only experienced a sort of recovery after the fall of the Equora dynasty, and the consequent accelerated decay of the intricate inflection system it had built up over the years.

In the conjugation tables above, the participles for each verb are listed with an additional letter each appended in parentheses to the end. In the "standard" Classical Arithide, the correct participle forms do not include the letters in brackets, nor as modifiers include them but simply conjugate in their base form according to the declension class of their referent. In earlier periods, however, up to the decades before the Three Hundred Golden Years, the correct forms for the perfective and imperfective participles ended in -a, subsequently dropped, and as modifiers of the nominal class declined as per the fifth declension; the bracketed m after the imperfective participles, on the other hand, arose after the fall of the Equora by analogy with the perfective participle.

See also