Kitchen sink conlang: Difference between revisions
WeepingElf (talk | contribs) (New page: A '''kitchen sink conlang''' is a conlang that has "everything including the kitchen sink", i.e. a conlang of unrealistic phonological and/or grammatical complexity. While natlangs ca...) |
WeepingElf (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A '''kitchen sink conlang''' is a conlang that has "everything including the kitchen sink", i.e. a conlang of unrealistic phonological and/or grammatical complexity. While [[natlang]]s can be quite complex and a good [[naturalistic artlang]] reflects this, a kitchen sink conlang involves excessive complication without adding more depth. | {{stub}} | ||
A '''kitchen sink conlang''' is a conlang that has "everything including the kitchen sink", i.e. a pejorative term for a conlang of unrealistic phonological and/or grammatical complexity. While [[natlang]]s can be quite complex and a good [[naturalistic artlang]] reflects this, a kitchen sink conlang involves excessive complication without adding more depth. | |||
No single feature can turn a conlang into a kitchen sink - what is called for is a combination of several perceivedly unusual features, or even ordinary features that do not "work together". | |||
A conlang should not be call'd "kitchensinky" lightly, without considering the risk of [[ANADEW]]. The phonology of [[wikipedia:Dahalo language|Dahalo]] is a good example. | |||
{{Conlangs}} | |||
[[Category:Types of conlangs]] | |||
[[Category:Kitchen sink conlangs|*]] |
Latest revision as of 12:25, 22 April 2013
A kitchen sink conlang is a conlang that has "everything including the kitchen sink", i.e. a pejorative term for a conlang of unrealistic phonological and/or grammatical complexity. While natlangs can be quite complex and a good naturalistic artlang reflects this, a kitchen sink conlang involves excessive complication without adding more depth.
No single feature can turn a conlang into a kitchen sink - what is called for is a combination of several perceivedly unusual features, or even ordinary features that do not "work together".
A conlang should not be call'd "kitchensinky" lightly, without considering the risk of ANADEW. The phonology of Dahalo is a good example.
This article is part of a series on Types of Conlangs. "Reason" classification system: Artlangs * Funlangs * Engineered language * Philosophical language * Arithmographic language * Logical language * Fictional languages * Exolangs * Diachronic conlangs * Lostlangs * Altlangs * Auxlangs |