Dal'qörian adjective tense
back to main page
Past tense denoting was/were
dal’qörian has a unique past tense inflection with adjectives. This is because dal’qörian has no literal equivalent of the auxiliary verbs was/were and the perfect tense had been. This is formed with the prefix gé’ and when used with an adjective, it renders was/were or had been. Here are some examples: (Note: modifying words like disiri-very, disénig-quite and veclérÞ-really, always FOLLOW the adjective in the past tense but PRECEDE it in the present and future):
- sia gé’vélø. She was nasty.
- ädiáda, tiÞ gé’strömi disénig. It was quite hot yesterday. (lit: Yesterday, it was hot quite).
- éren, gé’lenandrädn veclérÞ. They were really helpful. (lit: They were helpful really).
- di ødörämösel gé’vemörädn disiri. The instructions were very clear.
As you can see, was or were is denoted by a singular or a plural noun/pronoun.
Adjective continuous past
Because of the dal'qörian tense system, ambiguity can arise on many occasions if it is not used correctly. Lets look at this example sentence:
- She has been depressed for a very long time.
The past tense has been implies that she 'had' become depressed in the past and 'still is'. So the action of being depressed is 'still' on going. However, we cannot literally translate this sentence into dal'qörian because we cannot say has been. A common mistake might be to put the sentence into the adjective past tense:
- öcra tirimiÞ, sia gé’námaroqu disiri. She was very depressed for a long time.
This however, would be conveying the wrong message because was would imply that she is no longer depressed when, in fact, she is. We would only use this tense if we wanted to say:
- She had been very depressed for a long time. (and no is longer)
So, for this kind of continuous past formation (with adjectives/adverbs only), where the ‘state’ is still on going, we use the present tense with the preposition sintra-since:
- sintra tirimiÞ, sia disiri námaroqu. (lit: Since a long time, she is very depressed. Translating as: She has been depressed for a very long time).
The first part of the sentence tells us that the action had begun in the past; the second part, being in the present indicative, tells us that the action is still on going.
NOTE: When stating the continuous past regarding the existential position of people or objects, you would normally use the verb Þalár-reside. However, in colloquial dal'qörian, the verb can be omitted:
- sintra sol qömblel, éren gä’ábraÞalár dérÞ. (lit: Since six weeks, they have resided here. Translating as: They have been here for six weeks).
Adjective future tense
In dal'qörian, there are two ways in which the future tense with adjectives can be constructed. Firstly, the verb néba-be is not used. The verb vädenár-become is used instead. (see Verbs for verb inflections):
- di quádrátsi gä’ságr,, taÞ vonériáda vädenáræ strömi. The weather man said it will be hot tomorrow. (lit: The weather man said, that tomorrow will become hot).
- méla diö viti’behalbrädn,, nes siaparenöi vädenáræ disiri quranöra. Mummy will be very happy if you behave well. (lit: If you are well behaved, then Mummy will become very happy).
Again in a colloquial sense (and somewhat idiomatically), you can add the future suffix ræ to the pronoun tiÞ-it (or the compound form tätiÞ-that it when introducing a subordinate clause) and refer the adjective reflexively back to the noun, just like a verb
- iáda, tiÞræ vélø tiÞöra. It will be hot today (lit: Today, it will hot itself)
- di quádrátsi gä’ságr, tätiÞræ vonériáda strömi tiÞöra. The weather man said it will be hot tomorrow. (lit: The weather man said that it will tomorrow hot itself).
NOTE: The adverb tomorrow in the last example must follow the contraction tätiÞræ as it would normally follow the subordinating conjunction taÞ.
