Guild of Scholars Docket

From FrathWiki
Revision as of 13:20, 10 April 2018 by LinguarumMagister (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Current Proposals before the Guild of Scholars: Old Business 1. Munayamhe Forum 2. Saist Forum New Business 3. Specific Directionals: The directionals /kuna/ and /kunu/...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search

Current Proposals before the Guild of Scholars:

Old Business

1. Munayamhe Forum

2. Saist Forum

New Business

3. Specific Directionals: The directionals /kuna/ and /kunu/ have the allomorphs /hunu/ and /huna/ following a nasal noun. Are the analogical forms /hana/ and /hanu/ from /kana/ and /kanu/ legitimate.


4. Converbals:

a. Contraction: Is it legitimate to contract the converbal affixes -muluka- and -muluyam- to -mluka- and -mluyam- following an oral vowel rather than the authorized -muka- and -muyam-, provided that new nasal vowel does not obscure the meaning of the verb?

b. Cases have been reported of -yosaku- plus negative polarity and irrealis mood instead of -yosa- plus positive polarity and realis mood to express certainty. This appears to be influence from -teku- plus negative polarity. Is this a legitimate form?

Retrieved from "http://www.frathwiki.com/index.php?title=Guild_of_Scholars_Docket&oldid=115777"