The wiki has recently been updated. Please contact me by talk page or email if you encounter any issues.

Kilda Kelen: Difference between revisions

From FrathWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
"Neo-Khitanese" is a preliminary label to describe a member of the League of Lost Languages spoken today on the Kamchatka Peninsula in northeastern Siberia. Foreign scholars consider it to be an Altaic language -- the family consisting of the Turkic, Mongolian, and Tungusic language groups, and according to some, Korean or Japanese. However, the Neo-Khitanese themselves currently reject the 'Altaic Hypothesis'.
"Neo-Khitanese" is a preliminary label to describe a member of the League of Lost Languages that is spoken today on the Kamchatka Peninsula in northeastern Siberia. Foreign scholars consider it to be an Altaic language -- the family consisting of the Turkic, Mongolian, and Tungusic language groups, and according to some, Korean or Japanese. However, the Neo-Khitanese themselves currently reject the 'Altaic Hypothesis'.


More easily agreed upon is that Neo-Khitanese is a Tungusic language. Within that family, it is most closely related to the northern branch of that family -- specifically to Evenki (or "Tungus") and to Even (or "Lamut").  
It is more easily agreed upon that Neo-Khitanese is a Tungusic language. Within that family, it has most in common with the northern branch of that family -- specifically to Evenki (or "Tungus") and to Even (or "Lamut").  


Phonologically, it has a regular system of front/back vowel harmony, in which lexical stems determine the vowel quality of any affixes. It distinguishes long from short vowels and has a simple (C)V(C) syllable structure. Grammatically, it is highly agglutinative, has basic SOV word order, accusative syntax, and a wealth of non-finite verb forms. In all these respects it is quite a typical North Tungusic language.
Phonologically, it has a regular system of front/back vowel harmony, in which lexical stems determine the vowel quality of any affixes. "Front" vowels are '''e i ö ü''' while "back" vowels are '''a ï o u'''; it additionally distinguishes vowel length. Syllable structure is generally simple and of (C)V(C) form, with almost no clusters of more than two consonants, and very rare word-initial or word-final consonant clusters even in loanwords.  


Its lexicon, however, shows signs of being archaic, most noticeably in preserving initial '''*p-''' as '''p-''' or '''f-''', where it has > '''h-''' > '''0-''' in North Tungusic languages). Furthermore it has many lexemes found only in Tungusic languages of the Southern or "Amuric" group, and not in other North Tungusic languages. More interesting, is the large quantity of cognates or early loanwords from Preclassical or Middle Mongolian and from Old Turkic -- suggesting there may be some truth to the Neo-Khitanese belief that they are descendants of the Khitans who ruled northern China under the Liao dynasty.
Grammatically, it is highly agglutinative, suffixing, has basic SOV word order, accusative syntax, and a wealth of non-finite verb forms. In all these respects it is quite a typical North Tungusic language, though it has a slightly reduced inflectional morphology compared to Even or Evenki. Nevertheless most morphological and syntactic constructions can be directly matched to corresponding forms in either or both of those languages.


Neo-Khitanese has also absorbed very large numbers of lexical items from languages indigenous to Kamchatka (Ainu of the Kurile Islands and Itelmen, primarily the Southern and Eastern Itelmen languages) and from languages neighboring Kamchatka (the Koryak and Alutor languages, and more recently from Aleut and Pacific Yupik -- confusingly now called Aluutiq). There are even a small number of foreign loans from the heyday of Neo-Khitanese seafaring and trading in the Pacific Rim. In the 19th and 20th century, Neo-Khitanese has proven much more conservative towards foreign influences than it has in the past, and has (relatively) few 'global' or 'international' vocabulary items borrowed from English or Russian. Perhaps as much as 1/4 or even 1/3 of the total lexicon is of non-Altaic or non-Tungusic origin.
Its lexicon, however, shows signs of being more archaic; most noticeably in preserving initial '''*p-''' as '''p-''' or '''f-''' (which has gone > '''h-''' > '''0-''' in the other North Tungusic languages). Furthermore it has many lexemes found only in the Southern (or "Amuric") branch of Tungusic. Additionally, a large quantity of what have variously been interpreted as cognates or as early loanwords from Preclassical or Middle Mongolian and from Old Turkic suggests is generally accepted nowadays as support of the traditional Neo-Khitanese belief that they are descendants of the Khitans who ruled northern China under the Liao dynasty (907-1125 CE). Neo-Khitanese has furthermore absorbed very large numbers of lexical items from languages indigenous to Kamchatka (Kurile Ainu, Southern and Eastern "dialects" of Itelmen) and from languages neighboring Kamchatka (the Koryak and Alutor languages, and later from Aleut and even Pacific Yupik -- confusingly now called Aluutiq). There are also a small number of foreign loans from the heyday of Neo-Khitanese seafaring and trading in the Pacific Rim. In the 19th and 20th century, Neo-Khitanese proved much more conservative towards foreign influence than in the past, and has (relatively) few "global" or "international" vocabulary items borrowed from English or Russian. Perhaps as much as 1/4 or even 1/3 of the total lexicon is of non-Altaic or non-Tungusic origin.


The Neo-Khitanese in Kamchatka continued to use forms of the Khitan logosyllabic writing system until the early 1800s, when Latin orthographies were adopted. The language has also been written in Japanese katakana (during 1941-1945), the Russian Cyrillic alphabet (primarily by Orthodox missionaries, priests, and converts beginning in the early 1700s), and in a "runic" syllabary devised in the late 1800s on the basis of the old Khitan script.
The Neo-Khitanese in Kamchatka used forms of the Khitan logosyllabic writing system until the early 1800s, when Latin orthographies were adopted. The language has also been written in Japanese katakana (during 1941-1945), the Russian Cyrillic alphabet (primarily by Orthodox missionaries, priests, and converts beginning in the early 1700s), and in a "runic" syllabary devised in the late 1800s on the basis of the old Khitan script.


* [[Neo-Khitanese Syntax]]
* [[Neo-Khitanese Syntax]]

Revision as of 13:17, 12 April 2006

"Neo-Khitanese" is a preliminary label to describe a member of the League of Lost Languages that is spoken today on the Kamchatka Peninsula in northeastern Siberia. Foreign scholars consider it to be an Altaic language -- the family consisting of the Turkic, Mongolian, and Tungusic language groups, and according to some, Korean or Japanese. However, the Neo-Khitanese themselves currently reject the 'Altaic Hypothesis'.

It is more easily agreed upon that Neo-Khitanese is a Tungusic language. Within that family, it has most in common with the northern branch of that family -- specifically to Evenki (or "Tungus") and to Even (or "Lamut").

Phonologically, it has a regular system of front/back vowel harmony, in which lexical stems determine the vowel quality of any affixes. "Front" vowels are e i ö ü while "back" vowels are a ï o u; it additionally distinguishes vowel length. Syllable structure is generally simple and of (C)V(C) form, with almost no clusters of more than two consonants, and very rare word-initial or word-final consonant clusters even in loanwords.

Grammatically, it is highly agglutinative, suffixing, has basic SOV word order, accusative syntax, and a wealth of non-finite verb forms. In all these respects it is quite a typical North Tungusic language, though it has a slightly reduced inflectional morphology compared to Even or Evenki. Nevertheless most morphological and syntactic constructions can be directly matched to corresponding forms in either or both of those languages.

Its lexicon, however, shows signs of being more archaic; most noticeably in preserving initial *p- as p- or f- (which has gone > h- > 0- in the other North Tungusic languages). Furthermore it has many lexemes found only in the Southern (or "Amuric") branch of Tungusic. Additionally, a large quantity of what have variously been interpreted as cognates or as early loanwords from Preclassical or Middle Mongolian and from Old Turkic suggests is generally accepted nowadays as support of the traditional Neo-Khitanese belief that they are descendants of the Khitans who ruled northern China under the Liao dynasty (907-1125 CE). Neo-Khitanese has furthermore absorbed very large numbers of lexical items from languages indigenous to Kamchatka (Kurile Ainu, Southern and Eastern "dialects" of Itelmen) and from languages neighboring Kamchatka (the Koryak and Alutor languages, and later from Aleut and even Pacific Yupik -- confusingly now called Aluutiq). There are also a small number of foreign loans from the heyday of Neo-Khitanese seafaring and trading in the Pacific Rim. In the 19th and 20th century, Neo-Khitanese proved much more conservative towards foreign influence than in the past, and has (relatively) few "global" or "international" vocabulary items borrowed from English or Russian. Perhaps as much as 1/4 or even 1/3 of the total lexicon is of non-Altaic or non-Tungusic origin.

The Neo-Khitanese in Kamchatka used forms of the Khitan logosyllabic writing system until the early 1800s, when Latin orthographies were adopted. The language has also been written in Japanese katakana (during 1941-1945), the Russian Cyrillic alphabet (primarily by Orthodox missionaries, priests, and converts beginning in the early 1700s), and in a "runic" syllabary devised in the late 1800s on the basis of the old Khitan script.