Indo-Iranian languages: Difference between revisions

From FrathWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 6: Line 6:
The most characteristic feature of Indo-Iranian may be its simplification of the PIE vowel system: *e, *o, *a, *n̥, *m̥ were all merged as simple *a. This phonemicized the previous set of palatal consonants. — On the other hand, late PIE *ə (the vocalized allophone of laryngeals) was instead raised to *i.
The most characteristic feature of Indo-Iranian may be its simplification of the PIE vowel system: *e, *o, *a, *n̥, *m̥ were all merged as simple *a. This phonemicized the previous set of palatal consonants. — On the other hand, late PIE *ə (the vocalized allophone of laryngeals) was instead raised to *i.


==Subgrouping==
==Subgroups==


The '''Iranian''' group was originally set up to contain all members of Indo-Iranian not derivable from [[Sanskrit]]. However, only a small number of isoglosses defining Iranian as a whole have been proposed, and most of these isoglosses appear to "leak" in some way or the other (appearing reversed or absent in a number of descendants, or being found also outside the normally accepted boundaries of Iranian). By now at least the Nuristani languages are widely recognized as a separate group.
The '''Iranian''' group was originally set up to contain all members of Indo-Iranian not derivable from [[Sanskrit]]. However, only a small number of isoglosses defining Iranian as a whole have been proposed, and most of these isoglosses appear to "leak" in some way or the other (appearing reversed or absent in a number of descendants, or being found also outside the normally accepted boundaries of Iranian). By now at least the Nuristani languages are widely recognized as a separate group.


An agnostic account might recognize as many as six branches of Indo-Iranian:
An agnostic account might recognize as many as six branches of Indo-Iranian:
* '''Sakan''', a small northwestern group of three languages: †Khotanese, †Tumshuqese, and Wakhi.
* '''Sakan''', a small northeastern group of three languages: †Khotanese, †Tumshuqese, and Wakhi.
* '''Persid''' (Southwestern Iranian), comprising Old Persian and its descendants.
* '''Persid''' ("Southwestern Iranian"), comprising Old Persian and its descendants.
* '''Narrow Iranian''' consists of most languages traditionally considered Iranian. Perhaps further subdividable.
* '''Narrow Iranian''': most languages traditionally considered Iranian. Drawing an exact perimeter remains difficult. Further subdividable:
** †'''Avestan''', attested very early on as a liturgical language, but shows several unique innovations now known from any other Indo-Iranian language, including [[rhinoglottophilia]].
** '''Balochi''', spoken in southeastern Pakistan, shows certain important archaisms.
** '''Ormuri-Parachi'''
** '''Bactric''' comprises †Bactrian and Munji-Yidgha.
** '''Pashto''' shows similarities to the previous cluster on one hand, Sakan on the other.
** '''Scytho-Sarmatian''', today represented only by [[Ossetic]] but formerly including several important languages of the Eurasian steppe, such as Alan and the titular Scythian.
** '''Sogdic''' comprises †Sogdian and [[Yaghnobi]].
* '''Nuristani''', spoken in the Hindu Kush mountains.
* '''Nuristani''', spoken in the Hindu Kush mountains.
* '''Dardic''', spoken also in the Hindu Kush mountains. Usually considered closely affiliated to Narrow Indic.
* '''Dardic''', spoken also in the Hindu Kush mountains. Usually considered closely affiliated to Narrow Indic.
* '''Narrow Indic''' consists of most languages traditionally considered Indic (Indo-Aryan).
* '''Narrow Indic''' consists of most languages traditionally considered Indic (Indo-Aryan).


Phonetical isoglosses connecting these groups include:
Major phonetical isoglosses connecting these groups include:
* The two PII voiced series (traditionally reconstructed as plain voiced vs. voiced aspirate) merge everywhere except in Narrow Indic. This change is shared also with Balto-Slavic and Albanian.
* The two PII voiced series (traditionally reconstructed as plain voiced vs. voiced aspirate) merge everywhere except in Narrow Indic. This change is shared also with Balto-Slavic and Albanian.
** Phonation residues of the contrast have been reported from Dardic.
* The PII clusters *ćw, *jw undergo different characteristic development in each of the traditional "Iranian" branches:
* The PII clusters *ćw, *jw undergo different characteristic development in each of the traditional "Iranian" branches:
** Sakan: *ćw, *jw > *š, *ž
** Sakan: *ćw, *jw > ?*św, *źw > *š, *ž.
** Persid: *ćw, *jw > *s, *z
** Persid: *ćw, *jw > *s, *z. Perhaps best interpreted as an early deaffrication to *św
** Narrow Iranian, Nuristani, Dardic: *ćw, *jw > *sp, *zb
** Narrow Iranian, Nuristani, Dardic: *ćw, *jw > *sp, *zb
* In other positions the PII postalveolars *ć, *j are fronted to dental affricates *ts, *dz, in all varieties other than Dardic and Narrow Indic. The change must be dated as posterior to the previous changes, and is therefore inapplicable as evidence for a common Iranian or Iranian-Nuristani group.
* In other positions the PII postalveolars *ć, *j are fronted to dental affricates *ts, *dz, in all varieties other than Dardic and Narrow Indic. The change must be dated as posterior to the previous changes, and is therefore inapplicable as evidence for a common Iranian or Iranian-Nuristani group (at least if one wishes to include Sakan). The affricates remain in Nuristani, but develop further elsewhere:
** In Persid these are furthermore fronted to *θ and *ð > *d. (Albanian has a similar development.)
** In Persid these are fronted to *θ and *ð > *d. (A similar development is known from Albanian, though this is probably unrelated.)
** In Narrow Iranian as well as Sakan these are deaffricated to *s, *z. (Slavic has a similar development, though in light of the Baltic evidence, here fronting was later than deaffrication.)
** In Narrow Iranian + Sakan these are deaffricated to *s, *z. This extends to Slavic and Latvian as well.
* Dardic and Narrow Indic merge the PII postalveolars with the PII palatals *ĉ *ĵ⁽ʰ⁾, with the exception of *ć; this yields Dardic *š, Narrow Indic *ś.
* Dardic and Narrow Indic merge the PII postalveolars with the PII palatals *ĉ *ĵ⁽ʰ⁾, with the exception of *ć; this yields Dardic *š, Narrow Indic *ś.
* In Persid + most of Narrow Iranian (but absent from Balochi), PII *p *t *k are spirantized to *f *θ *x preceding a consonant.
* In Persid + most of Narrow Iranian (but absent from Balochi and Sakan), PII *p *t *k are spirantized to *f *θ *x preceding a consonant.
* Sakan, Dardic and Narrow Indic develop a series of voiceless aspirates from PIE (and PII) clusters of voiceless stop + *h₂. Originally this was posited as a common Indo-Iranian innovation, though one would have to assume later lenition to voiceless fricatives in parts of Iranian (better handled as a part of the previous soundlaw), and loss of aspiration altogether in Nuristani.
* Sakan, Dardic and Narrow Indic develop a series of voiceless aspirates from PIE (and PII) clusters of voiceless stop + *h₂. Originally this was posited as a common Indo-Iranian innovation, though one would have to assume later lenition to voiceless fricatives in parts of Iranian (better handled as a part of the previous soundlaw), and loss of aspiration altogether in Nuristani; a more limited soundlaw allows a more economical analysis.

Revision as of 14:55, 22 July 2014

Development

Indo-Iranian is a part of the Satem areal also including the Balto-Slavic languages, Albanian and Armenian. In these languages PIE "palatovelar" consonants (probably originally the plain velars) were characteristically fronted to postalveolar affricates *c, *jʰ, *j, while the PIE labiovelars and "plain velars" (probably originally uvulars) were then merged as new velars *k, *gʰ, *g.

The Law of Palatals introduced to Indo-Iranian a new set of palatal consonants: *k > *ĉ, *g⁽ʰ) > *ĵ⁽ʰ⁾, when preceding the original front vowels *e, *i.

The most characteristic feature of Indo-Iranian may be its simplification of the PIE vowel system: *e, *o, *a, *n̥, *m̥ were all merged as simple *a. This phonemicized the previous set of palatal consonants. — On the other hand, late PIE *ə (the vocalized allophone of laryngeals) was instead raised to *i.

Subgroups

The Iranian group was originally set up to contain all members of Indo-Iranian not derivable from Sanskrit. However, only a small number of isoglosses defining Iranian as a whole have been proposed, and most of these isoglosses appear to "leak" in some way or the other (appearing reversed or absent in a number of descendants, or being found also outside the normally accepted boundaries of Iranian). By now at least the Nuristani languages are widely recognized as a separate group.

An agnostic account might recognize as many as six branches of Indo-Iranian:

  • Sakan, a small northeastern group of three languages: †Khotanese, †Tumshuqese, and Wakhi.
  • Persid ("Southwestern Iranian"), comprising Old Persian and its descendants.
  • Narrow Iranian: most languages traditionally considered Iranian. Drawing an exact perimeter remains difficult. Further subdividable:
    • Avestan, attested very early on as a liturgical language, but shows several unique innovations now known from any other Indo-Iranian language, including rhinoglottophilia.
    • Balochi, spoken in southeastern Pakistan, shows certain important archaisms.
    • Ormuri-Parachi
    • Bactric comprises †Bactrian and Munji-Yidgha.
    • Pashto shows similarities to the previous cluster on one hand, Sakan on the other.
    • Scytho-Sarmatian, today represented only by Ossetic but formerly including several important languages of the Eurasian steppe, such as Alan and the titular Scythian.
    • Sogdic comprises †Sogdian and Yaghnobi.
  • Nuristani, spoken in the Hindu Kush mountains.
  • Dardic, spoken also in the Hindu Kush mountains. Usually considered closely affiliated to Narrow Indic.
  • Narrow Indic consists of most languages traditionally considered Indic (Indo-Aryan).

Major phonetical isoglosses connecting these groups include:

  • The two PII voiced series (traditionally reconstructed as plain voiced vs. voiced aspirate) merge everywhere except in Narrow Indic. This change is shared also with Balto-Slavic and Albanian.
    • Phonation residues of the contrast have been reported from Dardic.
  • The PII clusters *ćw, *jw undergo different characteristic development in each of the traditional "Iranian" branches:
    • Sakan: *ćw, *jw > ?*św, *źw > *š, *ž.
    • Persid: *ćw, *jw > *s, *z. Perhaps best interpreted as an early deaffrication to *św
    • Narrow Iranian, Nuristani, Dardic: *ćw, *jw > *sp, *zb
  • In other positions the PII postalveolars *ć, *j are fronted to dental affricates *ts, *dz, in all varieties other than Dardic and Narrow Indic. The change must be dated as posterior to the previous changes, and is therefore inapplicable as evidence for a common Iranian or Iranian-Nuristani group (at least if one wishes to include Sakan). The affricates remain in Nuristani, but develop further elsewhere:
    • In Persid these are fronted to *θ and *ð > *d. (A similar development is known from Albanian, though this is probably unrelated.)
    • In Narrow Iranian + Sakan these are deaffricated to *s, *z. This extends to Slavic and Latvian as well.
  • Dardic and Narrow Indic merge the PII postalveolars with the PII palatals *ĉ *ĵ⁽ʰ⁾, with the exception of *ć; this yields Dardic *š, Narrow Indic *ś.
  • In Persid + most of Narrow Iranian (but absent from Balochi and Sakan), PII *p *t *k are spirantized to *f *θ *x preceding a consonant.
  • Sakan, Dardic and Narrow Indic develop a series of voiceless aspirates from PIE (and PII) clusters of voiceless stop + *h₂. Originally this was posited as a common Indo-Iranian innovation, though one would have to assume later lenition to voiceless fricatives in parts of Iranian (better handled as a part of the previous soundlaw), and loss of aspiration altogether in Nuristani; a more limited soundlaw allows a more economical analysis.