Indo-Iranian languages: Difference between revisions
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
The most characteristic feature of Indo-Iranian may be its simplification of the PIE vowel system: *e, *o, *a, *n̥, *m̥ were all merged as simple *a. This phonemicized the previous set of palatal consonants. — On the other hand, late PIE *ə (the vocalized allophone of laryngeals) was instead raised to *i. | The most characteristic feature of Indo-Iranian may be its simplification of the PIE vowel system: *e, *o, *a, *n̥, *m̥ were all merged as simple *a. This phonemicized the previous set of palatal consonants. — On the other hand, late PIE *ə (the vocalized allophone of laryngeals) was instead raised to *i. | ||
== | ==Subgroups== | ||
The '''Iranian''' group was originally set up to contain all members of Indo-Iranian not derivable from [[Sanskrit]]. However, only a small number of isoglosses defining Iranian as a whole have been proposed, and most of these isoglosses appear to "leak" in some way or the other (appearing reversed or absent in a number of descendants, or being found also outside the normally accepted boundaries of Iranian). By now at least the Nuristani languages are widely recognized as a separate group. | The '''Iranian''' group was originally set up to contain all members of Indo-Iranian not derivable from [[Sanskrit]]. However, only a small number of isoglosses defining Iranian as a whole have been proposed, and most of these isoglosses appear to "leak" in some way or the other (appearing reversed or absent in a number of descendants, or being found also outside the normally accepted boundaries of Iranian). By now at least the Nuristani languages are widely recognized as a separate group. | ||
An agnostic account might recognize as many as six branches of Indo-Iranian: | An agnostic account might recognize as many as six branches of Indo-Iranian: | ||
* '''Sakan''', a small | * '''Sakan''', a small northeastern group of three languages: †Khotanese, †Tumshuqese, and Wakhi. | ||
* '''Persid''' (Southwestern Iranian), comprising Old Persian and its descendants. | * '''Persid''' ("Southwestern Iranian"), comprising Old Persian and its descendants. | ||
* '''Narrow Iranian''' | * '''Narrow Iranian''': most languages traditionally considered Iranian. Drawing an exact perimeter remains difficult. Further subdividable: | ||
** †'''Avestan''', attested very early on as a liturgical language, but shows several unique innovations now known from any other Indo-Iranian language, including [[rhinoglottophilia]]. | |||
** '''Balochi''', spoken in southeastern Pakistan, shows certain important archaisms. | |||
** '''Ormuri-Parachi''' | |||
** '''Bactric''' comprises †Bactrian and Munji-Yidgha. | |||
** '''Pashto''' shows similarities to the previous cluster on one hand, Sakan on the other. | |||
** '''Scytho-Sarmatian''', today represented only by [[Ossetic]] but formerly including several important languages of the Eurasian steppe, such as Alan and the titular Scythian. | |||
** '''Sogdic''' comprises †Sogdian and [[Yaghnobi]]. | |||
* '''Nuristani''', spoken in the Hindu Kush mountains. | * '''Nuristani''', spoken in the Hindu Kush mountains. | ||
* '''Dardic''', spoken also in the Hindu Kush mountains. Usually considered closely affiliated to Narrow Indic. | * '''Dardic''', spoken also in the Hindu Kush mountains. Usually considered closely affiliated to Narrow Indic. | ||
* '''Narrow Indic''' consists of most languages traditionally considered Indic (Indo-Aryan). | * '''Narrow Indic''' consists of most languages traditionally considered Indic (Indo-Aryan). | ||
Major phonetical isoglosses connecting these groups include: | |||
* The two PII voiced series (traditionally reconstructed as plain voiced vs. voiced aspirate) merge everywhere except in Narrow Indic. This change is shared also with Balto-Slavic and Albanian. | * The two PII voiced series (traditionally reconstructed as plain voiced vs. voiced aspirate) merge everywhere except in Narrow Indic. This change is shared also with Balto-Slavic and Albanian. | ||
** Phonation residues of the contrast have been reported from Dardic. | |||
* The PII clusters *ćw, *jw undergo different characteristic development in each of the traditional "Iranian" branches: | * The PII clusters *ćw, *jw undergo different characteristic development in each of the traditional "Iranian" branches: | ||
** Sakan: *ćw, *jw > *š, *ž | ** Sakan: *ćw, *jw > ?*św, *źw > *š, *ž. | ||
** Persid: *ćw, *jw > *s, *z | ** Persid: *ćw, *jw > *s, *z. Perhaps best interpreted as an early deaffrication to *św | ||
** Narrow Iranian, Nuristani, Dardic: *ćw, *jw > *sp, *zb | ** Narrow Iranian, Nuristani, Dardic: *ćw, *jw > *sp, *zb | ||
* In other positions the PII postalveolars *ć, *j are fronted to dental affricates *ts, *dz, in all varieties other than Dardic and Narrow Indic. The change must be dated as posterior to the previous changes, and is therefore inapplicable as evidence for a common Iranian or Iranian-Nuristani group. | * In other positions the PII postalveolars *ć, *j are fronted to dental affricates *ts, *dz, in all varieties other than Dardic and Narrow Indic. The change must be dated as posterior to the previous changes, and is therefore inapplicable as evidence for a common Iranian or Iranian-Nuristani group (at least if one wishes to include Sakan). The affricates remain in Nuristani, but develop further elsewhere: | ||
** In Persid these are | ** In Persid these are fronted to *θ and *ð > *d. (A similar development is known from Albanian, though this is probably unrelated.) | ||
** In Narrow Iranian | ** In Narrow Iranian + Sakan these are deaffricated to *s, *z. This extends to Slavic and Latvian as well. | ||
* Dardic and Narrow Indic merge the PII postalveolars with the PII palatals *ĉ *ĵ⁽ʰ⁾, with the exception of *ć; this yields Dardic *š, Narrow Indic *ś. | * Dardic and Narrow Indic merge the PII postalveolars with the PII palatals *ĉ *ĵ⁽ʰ⁾, with the exception of *ć; this yields Dardic *š, Narrow Indic *ś. | ||
* In Persid + most of Narrow Iranian (but absent from Balochi), PII *p *t *k are spirantized to *f *θ *x preceding a consonant. | * In Persid + most of Narrow Iranian (but absent from Balochi and Sakan), PII *p *t *k are spirantized to *f *θ *x preceding a consonant. | ||
* Sakan, Dardic and Narrow Indic develop a series of voiceless aspirates from PIE (and PII) clusters of voiceless stop + *h₂. Originally this was posited as a common Indo-Iranian innovation, though one would have to assume later lenition to voiceless fricatives in parts of Iranian (better handled as a part of the previous soundlaw), and loss of aspiration altogether in Nuristani. | * Sakan, Dardic and Narrow Indic develop a series of voiceless aspirates from PIE (and PII) clusters of voiceless stop + *h₂. Originally this was posited as a common Indo-Iranian innovation, though one would have to assume later lenition to voiceless fricatives in parts of Iranian (better handled as a part of the previous soundlaw), and loss of aspiration altogether in Nuristani; a more limited soundlaw allows a more economical analysis. |
Revision as of 14:55, 22 July 2014
Development
Indo-Iranian is a part of the Satem areal also including the Balto-Slavic languages, Albanian and Armenian. In these languages PIE "palatovelar" consonants (probably originally the plain velars) were characteristically fronted to postalveolar affricates *c, *jʰ, *j, while the PIE labiovelars and "plain velars" (probably originally uvulars) were then merged as new velars *k, *gʰ, *g.
The Law of Palatals introduced to Indo-Iranian a new set of palatal consonants: *k > *ĉ, *g⁽ʰ) > *ĵ⁽ʰ⁾, when preceding the original front vowels *e, *i.
The most characteristic feature of Indo-Iranian may be its simplification of the PIE vowel system: *e, *o, *a, *n̥, *m̥ were all merged as simple *a. This phonemicized the previous set of palatal consonants. — On the other hand, late PIE *ə (the vocalized allophone of laryngeals) was instead raised to *i.
Subgroups
The Iranian group was originally set up to contain all members of Indo-Iranian not derivable from Sanskrit. However, only a small number of isoglosses defining Iranian as a whole have been proposed, and most of these isoglosses appear to "leak" in some way or the other (appearing reversed or absent in a number of descendants, or being found also outside the normally accepted boundaries of Iranian). By now at least the Nuristani languages are widely recognized as a separate group.
An agnostic account might recognize as many as six branches of Indo-Iranian:
- Sakan, a small northeastern group of three languages: †Khotanese, †Tumshuqese, and Wakhi.
- Persid ("Southwestern Iranian"), comprising Old Persian and its descendants.
- Narrow Iranian: most languages traditionally considered Iranian. Drawing an exact perimeter remains difficult. Further subdividable:
- †Avestan, attested very early on as a liturgical language, but shows several unique innovations now known from any other Indo-Iranian language, including rhinoglottophilia.
- Balochi, spoken in southeastern Pakistan, shows certain important archaisms.
- Ormuri-Parachi
- Bactric comprises †Bactrian and Munji-Yidgha.
- Pashto shows similarities to the previous cluster on one hand, Sakan on the other.
- Scytho-Sarmatian, today represented only by Ossetic but formerly including several important languages of the Eurasian steppe, such as Alan and the titular Scythian.
- Sogdic comprises †Sogdian and Yaghnobi.
- Nuristani, spoken in the Hindu Kush mountains.
- Dardic, spoken also in the Hindu Kush mountains. Usually considered closely affiliated to Narrow Indic.
- Narrow Indic consists of most languages traditionally considered Indic (Indo-Aryan).
Major phonetical isoglosses connecting these groups include:
- The two PII voiced series (traditionally reconstructed as plain voiced vs. voiced aspirate) merge everywhere except in Narrow Indic. This change is shared also with Balto-Slavic and Albanian.
- Phonation residues of the contrast have been reported from Dardic.
- The PII clusters *ćw, *jw undergo different characteristic development in each of the traditional "Iranian" branches:
- Sakan: *ćw, *jw > ?*św, *źw > *š, *ž.
- Persid: *ćw, *jw > *s, *z. Perhaps best interpreted as an early deaffrication to *św
- Narrow Iranian, Nuristani, Dardic: *ćw, *jw > *sp, *zb
- In other positions the PII postalveolars *ć, *j are fronted to dental affricates *ts, *dz, in all varieties other than Dardic and Narrow Indic. The change must be dated as posterior to the previous changes, and is therefore inapplicable as evidence for a common Iranian or Iranian-Nuristani group (at least if one wishes to include Sakan). The affricates remain in Nuristani, but develop further elsewhere:
- In Persid these are fronted to *θ and *ð > *d. (A similar development is known from Albanian, though this is probably unrelated.)
- In Narrow Iranian + Sakan these are deaffricated to *s, *z. This extends to Slavic and Latvian as well.
- Dardic and Narrow Indic merge the PII postalveolars with the PII palatals *ĉ *ĵ⁽ʰ⁾, with the exception of *ć; this yields Dardic *š, Narrow Indic *ś.
- In Persid + most of Narrow Iranian (but absent from Balochi and Sakan), PII *p *t *k are spirantized to *f *θ *x preceding a consonant.
- Sakan, Dardic and Narrow Indic develop a series of voiceless aspirates from PIE (and PII) clusters of voiceless stop + *h₂. Originally this was posited as a common Indo-Iranian innovation, though one would have to assume later lenition to voiceless fricatives in parts of Iranian (better handled as a part of the previous soundlaw), and loss of aspiration altogether in Nuristani; a more limited soundlaw allows a more economical analysis.