User talk:Talskubilos: Difference between revisions
Talskubilos (talk | contribs) (Undo revision 68573 by Talskubilos (talk)) |
Talskubilos (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
This is not what I can leave standing. I am by far not the only one who considers it unwarranted. ''Most'' linguists think that the evidence is insufficient. It is people like you who are in the minority position. | This is not what I can leave standing. I am by far not the only one who considers it unwarranted. ''Most'' linguists think that the evidence is insufficient. It is people like you who are in the minority position. | ||
--[[User:WeepingElf|WeepingElf]] 08:05, 14 September 2012 (PDT) | --[[User:WeepingElf|WeepingElf]] 08:05, 14 September 2012 (PDT) | ||
Actually, most historical linguists have no position about Vasco-Caucasian because it's outside their own speciality (either IE or something else). [[Nostratic]] has more supporters than VC, but they're still a minority, so I think "many" would be more appropriate. [[User:Talskubilos|Talskubilos]] 06:08, 15 September 2012 (PDT) | |||
I have just added a link to your blog to the [[Vasco-Caucasian languages]] page. | I have just added a link to your blog to the [[Vasco-Caucasian languages]] page. | ||
--[[User:WeepingElf|WeepingElf]] 12:58, 14 September 2012 (PDT) | --[[User:WeepingElf|WeepingElf]] 12:58, 14 September 2012 (PDT) | ||
Revision as of 05:08, 15 September 2012
- Hi,
- I've reduced your ban. In the future you are welcome to work on your own ideas here, but please do not continue the Europic discussion with Jörg. —Muke Tever | ✎ 06:41, 31 July 2012 (PDT)
Vasco-Caucasian
I have created a page on Vasco-Caucasian languages, but it doesn't say much yet. Feel free to add to it. --WeepingElf 07:52, 12 September 2012 (PDT)
Thanks. Just to be fair, I changed "many linguists" by "Jörg Rhiemeier" ;-) Talskubilos 01:32, 14 September 2012 (PDT)
This is not what I can leave standing. I am by far not the only one who considers it unwarranted. Most linguists think that the evidence is insufficient. It is people like you who are in the minority position. --WeepingElf 08:05, 14 September 2012 (PDT)
Actually, most historical linguists have no position about Vasco-Caucasian because it's outside their own speciality (either IE or something else). Nostratic has more supporters than VC, but they're still a minority, so I think "many" would be more appropriate. Talskubilos 06:08, 15 September 2012 (PDT)
I have just added a link to your blog to the Vasco-Caucasian languages page. --WeepingElf 12:58, 14 September 2012 (PDT)
