Markedness: Difference between revisions

From FrathWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Brokenlinks}}
'''Markedness''' is a typological linguistic notion roughly equivalent to the "typicality" of a single feature. A language feature that is highly marked is atypical; one that is less marked is common (but, depending on the amount of possibilities, not necessarily overwhelmingly so). When the least marked choice in a set involves the ''absense'' of a feature, it is called '''unmarked'''.
'''Markedness''' is a typological linguistic notion roughly equivalent to the "typicality" of a single feature. A language feature that is highly marked is atypical; one that is less marked is common (but, depending on the amount of possibilities, not necessarily overwhelmingly so). When the least marked choice in a set involves the ''absense'' of a feature, it is called '''unmarked'''.



Latest revision as of 21:52, 22 November 2011

There are a lot of red links in this article!

If you can, please help clean this up by fixing the links or creating the missing pages.

Markedness is a typological linguistic notion roughly equivalent to the "typicality" of a single feature. A language feature that is highly marked is atypical; one that is less marked is common (but, depending on the amount of possibilities, not necessarily overwhelmingly so). When the least marked choice in a set involves the absense of a feature, it is called unmarked.

Markedness can only be compared to other similar features; it does not make sense to ask, for example, which of contour tone and comitative case is the more marked, as one is a pattern of prosody (within the domain of phonology) and the other is a case (within the domain of morphology).

Markedness is also qualitative: it can not be quantified, outside of the percentage of occurrence in a given sample of languages.

Examples of markedness

"A > B" is used here to signify that A is more marked than B, while ">>" signifies "very much more marked".