Talk:Inspirational Natlangs: Difference between revisions
From FrathWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→Duplicate: new section) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
We had a previous page on this topic at [[Natlang Resources]]. --[[User:Tropylium|<span class="IPA">Trɔpʏliʊm</span>]] • [[User talk:Tropylium|blah]] 00:55, 15 November 2011 (PST) | We had a previous page on this topic at [[Natlang Resources]]. --[[User:Tropylium|<span class="IPA">Trɔpʏliʊm</span>]] • [[User talk:Tropylium|blah]] 00:55, 15 November 2011 (PST) | ||
: Naturally. :) It hasn't been touched in two years, which shows — stale links. It's also a bit of an odd collection: fonts, calligraphy. linguistics papers focused on particular things but not giving a very good picture of an entire language. Some sort of merge-and-tidy would be good. — [[User:Wm.annis|Wm.annis]] 12:03, 16 November 2011 (PST) | |||
Revision as of 12:03, 16 November 2011
Copyright Entertainments
On conlang-l a defunct page similar to this one was mentioned, Grammars. Unfortunately, that copied documents to itself and ran afoul of copyright issues (or at least people thinking there were copyright issues). In light of that, it seems best to stick with links to freely available (i.e., non-paywalled) documents of clear provenance. — Wm.annis 11:12, 13 November 2011 (PST)
Duplicate
We had a previous page on this topic at Natlang Resources. --Trɔpʏliʊm • blah 00:55, 15 November 2011 (PST)
- Naturally. :) It hasn't been touched in two years, which shows — stale links. It's also a bit of an odd collection: fonts, calligraphy. linguistics papers focused on particular things but not giving a very good picture of an entire language. Some sort of merge-and-tidy would be good. — Wm.annis 12:03, 16 November 2011 (PST)
