Round Robin Conlang/Observations: Difference between revisions

From FrathWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(round 3 updates)
Line 16: Line 16:
|-
|-
! <small>Voiced<small>
! <small>Voiced<small>
| b || <!--d--> || || ɡ ||
| b || d || || ɡ ||
|-
|-
! colspan="2"| Nasals
! colspan="2"| Nasals
| m || colspan="2"| n || || <!--ŋ--> ||
| m || colspan="2"| n || || ŋ ||
|-
|-
! rowspan="2"| Fricatives
! rowspan="2"| Fricatives
Line 56: Line 56:
[ð̃ ɣ] have only been attested under spirant lenition thus far.
[ð̃ ɣ] have only been attested under spirant lenition thus far.


I would presume the process to apply regularly also to the "missing" [[buccal]] stops / nasals, ie. m,<!-- ŋ, d,--> k → ṽ,<!--ɣ̃, z (ð? l??),--> x. Whether the other consonants do anything remains to be seen.
I would presume the process to apply regularly also to the "missing" [[buccal]] stops / nasals, ie. m, ŋ, d, k → ṽ, ɣ̃, z (ð? l??), x. Whether the other consonants do anything remains to be seen.


===Other alternations===
===Other alternations===
Gemination appears to be regular for at least lenitable consonants, with ''bb'', ''tt'', ''nn'', ''gg''<!--, ''ŋŋ''--> attested. /tsʹ<!--, s-->/ appears to resist gemination as seen from ''betsʼaq<!--, ísasaq-->''.
Gemination appears to be regular for at least lenitable consonants, with ''bb'', ''tt'', ''nn'', ''gg'', ''ŋŋ'' attested. /tsʹ, s/ appears to resist gemination as seen from ''betsʼaq, ísasaq''.


There is also prenasalization (apparently identical with gemination for nasals).
There is also prenasalization (apparently identical with gemination for nasals).
Line 67: Line 67:


===Root structure===
===Root structure===
Consonants appearing in verbal roots might be drawn from a more restricted set than all consonants.  No voiceless fricatives <!--aside from /s/--> or /ts/ or /l/ appear in any of the attested verb roots (though /l/ is present in the sole unanalysed noun we have). [[User:AlexFink|AlexFink]]
Segments appearing in verbal roots might be drawn from a more restricted set than all consonants.  No voiceless fricatives aside from /s/, or /ts, l/, appear in any of the verb roots attested so far, and neither do /ɛ, ɔ, o/. [[User:AlexFink|AlexFink]]

Revision as of 10:00, 21 December 2009

Thought I'd look at what our phonology looks like so far. --Trɔpʏliʊmblah

Basic inventory

Consonants

Labial Coronal Velar Uvular Glottal
Stops /
affricates
Ejective tsʹ
Voiceless p t ts k q
Voiced b d ɡ
Nasals m n ŋ
Fricatives Voiceless f s χ h
Voiced v
Liquid l


Semivowel (?) /j/

Vowels /i e ɛ a ɔ o u/; /oi/; possibly /ai/ (seriously now, is "they two" [tsoi] or [tsai] ?) For purposes of vowel-harmonic suffixes, /a/ (phonetically open central [ä]?) counts as a back vowel.

Tone High and low. Low is unmarked.

Lenition

The following changes are attested:

Original p b t n g q
Lenited f v s ð̃ ɣ χ

[ð̃ ɣ] have only been attested under spirant lenition thus far.

I would presume the process to apply regularly also to the "missing" buccal stops / nasals, ie. m, ŋ, d, k → ṽ, ɣ̃, z (ð? l??), x. Whether the other consonants do anything remains to be seen.

Other alternations

Gemination appears to be regular for at least lenitable consonants, with bb, tt, nn, gg, ŋŋ attested. /tsʹ, s/ appears to resist gemination as seen from betsʼaq, ísasaq.

There is also prenasalization (apparently identical with gemination for nasals).

Syllable structure

Thus far (C)V(N)(C) seems sufficient (maximal example: boimb). Only clusters of two consonants have been observed medially, even them limited to geminates and nasal + consonant.

Root structure

Segments appearing in verbal roots might be drawn from a more restricted set than all consonants. No voiceless fricatives aside from /s/, or /ts, l/, appear in any of the verb roots attested so far, and neither do /ɛ, ɔ, o/. AlexFink