Round Robin Conlang/Observations: Difference between revisions
(→Root structure: oh, /ts/) |
(round 3 updates) |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
|- | |- | ||
! <small>Voiced<small> | ! <small>Voiced<small> | ||
| b || | | b || d || || ɡ || | ||
|- | |- | ||
! colspan="2"| Nasals | ! colspan="2"| Nasals | ||
| m || colspan="2"| n || || | | m || colspan="2"| n || || ŋ || | ||
|- | |- | ||
! rowspan="2"| Fricatives | ! rowspan="2"| Fricatives | ||
Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
[ð̃ ɣ] have only been attested under spirant lenition thus far. | [ð̃ ɣ] have only been attested under spirant lenition thus far. | ||
I would presume the process to apply regularly also to the "missing" [[buccal]] stops / nasals, ie. m, | I would presume the process to apply regularly also to the "missing" [[buccal]] stops / nasals, ie. m, ŋ, d, k → ṽ, ɣ̃, z (ð? l??), x. Whether the other consonants do anything remains to be seen. | ||
===Other alternations=== | ===Other alternations=== | ||
Gemination appears to be regular for at least lenitable consonants, with ''bb'', ''tt'', ''nn'', ''gg'' | Gemination appears to be regular for at least lenitable consonants, with ''bb'', ''tt'', ''nn'', ''gg'', ''ŋŋ'' attested. /tsʹ, s/ appears to resist gemination as seen from ''betsʼaq, ísasaq''. | ||
There is also prenasalization (apparently identical with gemination for nasals). | There is also prenasalization (apparently identical with gemination for nasals). | ||
Line 67: | Line 67: | ||
===Root structure=== | ===Root structure=== | ||
Segments appearing in verbal roots might be drawn from a more restricted set than all consonants. No voiceless fricatives aside from /s/, or /ts, l/, appear in any of the verb roots attested so far, and neither do /ɛ, ɔ, o/. [[User:AlexFink|AlexFink]] |
Revision as of 10:00, 21 December 2009
Thought I'd look at what our phonology looks like so far. --Trɔpʏliʊm • blah
Basic inventory
Consonants
Labial | Coronal | Velar | Uvular | Glottal | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stops / affricates |
Ejective | tsʹ | kʹ | ||||
Voiceless | p | t | ts | k | q | ||
Voiced | b | d | ɡ | ||||
Nasals | m | n | ŋ | ||||
Fricatives | Voiceless | f | s | χ | h | ||
Voiced | v | ||||||
Liquid | l |
Semivowel (?)
/j/
Vowels /i e ɛ a ɔ o u/; /oi/; possibly /ai/ (seriously now, is "they two" [tsoi] or [tsai] ?) For purposes of vowel-harmonic suffixes, /a/ (phonetically open central [ä]?) counts as a back vowel.
Tone High and low. Low is unmarked.
Lenition
The following changes are attested:
Original | p | b | t | n | g | q |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lenited | f | v | s | ð̃ | ɣ | χ |
[ð̃ ɣ] have only been attested under spirant lenition thus far.
I would presume the process to apply regularly also to the "missing" buccal stops / nasals, ie. m, ŋ, d, k → ṽ, ɣ̃, z (ð? l??), x. Whether the other consonants do anything remains to be seen.
Other alternations
Gemination appears to be regular for at least lenitable consonants, with bb, tt, nn, gg, ŋŋ attested. /tsʹ, s/ appears to resist gemination as seen from betsʼaq, ísasaq.
There is also prenasalization (apparently identical with gemination for nasals).
Syllable structure
Thus far (C)V(N)(C) seems sufficient (maximal example: boimb). Only clusters of two consonants have been observed medially, even them limited to geminates and nasal + consonant.
Root structure
Segments appearing in verbal roots might be drawn from a more restricted set than all consonants. No voiceless fricatives aside from /s/, or /ts, l/, appear in any of the verb roots attested so far, and neither do /ɛ, ɔ, o/. AlexFink