The wiki has recently been updated. Please contact me by talk page or email if you encounter any issues.

User:Bukkia/sandboxIII: Difference between revisions

From FrathWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 490: Line 490:
It can however convey, especially in later texts, the general meaning of ''motion from a place'', in other words, the beginning point of a motion of any kind. Such use is often confused with the postposition jɑl.
It can however convey, especially in later texts, the general meaning of ''motion from a place'', in other words, the beginning point of a motion of any kind. Such use is often confused with the postposition jɑl.
  sṓgošu hā́k ʔawɑpū́kow
  sṓgošu hā́k ʔawɑpū́kow
<small>I departed from the house. (my motion began from that place)</small>
In the classical period, this last role is played directly by the ''ablative'' case alone.
sṓgošu ʔawɑpū́kow
<small>I departed from the house. (my motion began from that place)</small>
=== jɑl ===
The postposition '''jɑl''' conveys the meaning of the complement of ''provenience''. It specifies the beginning point of an action or a state which can have more than one direction.
Kī́rtašu jɑl kigowow
<small>I came from Kī́rta. (my travel began in that city)</small>
This postposition always governs the '''ablative''' case.
It can however convey, especially in later texts, the general meaning of ''motion from a place'', in other words, the beginning point of a motion of any kind. Such use is often confused with the postposition hā́k.
sṓgošu jɑl ʔawɑpū́kow
  <small>I departed from the house. (my motion began from that place)</small>
  <small>I departed from the house. (my motion began from that place)</small>
In the classical period, this last role is played directly by the ''ablative'' case alone.
In the classical period, this last role is played directly by the ''ablative'' case alone.
  sṓgošu ʔawɑpū́kow
  sṓgošu ʔawɑpū́kow
  <small>I departed from the house. (my motion began from that place)</small>
  <small>I departed from the house. (my motion began from that place)</small>

Revision as of 10:57, 19 May 2023

Kī́rtako is one of the languages belonging to Piti language family. It stems directly from Proto-Piti language. It is spoken in the classic period and gives rise to a separate branch, named Kī́rtako languages. Two languages belong to this group and stem from Kī́rtako. It has an alphabetic script.

Phonology

Consonants

The consonant system distinguishes 20 phonemes, traditionally arranged in the following scheme:

The group of the plosive consonants distinguishes three sub-groups: voiceless, voiced, and aspirated, even though the voiced sub-group includes only the phoneme [g].

The group of the fricative consonants is overall well developed, although less rich, like the group of the nasal and of the liquid consonants. The glottal consonant, [ʔ], while formally a plosive, is traditionally included in the fricative group. The phonemes [j] and [w] have a full consonantal value and they are never regarded as semivowels.

Vowels

There are 6 vocalic phonemes, which exhibit other forms of distinction:

5 vowels have a short form and a long form. Each long form distinguishes two types: one with a rising tone and one with a falling tone.

The open-back phoneme, [ɑ], makes no distinction, neither in length nor in tone.

Stress

The stress is firmly on the first syllable of the word root.

[ˈkɑ.wo.kow]

Monosyllabic words, often with a grammatical meaning, are meant to be unstressed and cliticized to the word which they are grammatically bound to.

Polysyllabic words, which are generally composed by more than a word root, usually turn one of the stresses in a secondary one. The stress on the first root is the most likely to become secondary, while also the second stress may become the secondary, albeit in very rare cases.

[ˌpi.ke.ˈmeː˩˧.ʔi]

Tones

The long vowels make a distinction in tone, between a rising [Vː˩˧] tone and a falling [Vː˧˩] tone. Every long vowel has a tonal feature, which is always marked in the script.

pikemḗʔi [ˌpi.ke.ˈmeː˩˧.ʔi]

The vowels with the falling tone are found mostly at the end of words, due to the loss of a previous final consonant. They can be found, quite infrequently, in a medial position inside of a word, mostly in loanwords.

ʔimḗɣɑme - ʔimḕ [ˌʔi.meː˩˧.ɣɑ.me] - [ˌʔi.meː˧˩]

Syllabic structure

The basic syllable structure in Kī́rtako is (C)V(C). There are, however, some constraints:

  1. A word cannot consist of an exclusively vowel syllable, V, but such a syllable, V, can be found at the beginning of a multisyllabic word:
*[a]
[u.ˈma.tsoː˩˧.ta]
  1. A word can consist of only one syllable of type VC, and a polysyllabic word can begin with such a syllable:
[om]
[ˈer.tu]
  1. A CVC-type syllable is usually found at the end of a word, while is quite infrequent within the word or at its beginning. Monosyllabic words with such a syllabic structure are known to exist.
[ˈkɑ.wo.kow]
[ˈkiː˩˧r.ta.ko]
[ˈkoː˩˧w]
  1. CV-type syllables are allowed in every position within a polysyllabic word. Monosyllabic words with this structure are limited in number, but relevantly used.
[ˈko.wɑ.ka.ka]
[ˈnɑ]

Clusters of more than two consonants are prohibited, both in syllabic onset and in coda.

Diphthongs

There are no diphthongs of any kind; the phonemes [j] and [w] have always full consonantal value.

Typological structure

Kī́rtako is a morphologically agglutinative language, with an additional but strongly marked introflexive feature, realized in verbal roots.

The basic word order is essentially SOV (Subject-Object-Verb).

phū́kali mū́ke lī́lopɑt
(the) person sees (the) cow

The entire system is set according to typological parameters of the modifier-head (or head-final) type:

  • object - verb
  • noun - postposition
  • adjective - noun
  • relative clause - noun

Morphology

Nouns

Nouns in Kī́rtako language end almost exclusively in a vowel. A certain number of nouns, mostly loanwords, may unusually ends in a consonant; in this case a euphonic vowel, -ɑ-, in added at the end of noun before the normal declension endings.

Nouns are grouped into two declension classes: animate nouns or first class and inanimate nouns or second class. The first class generally includes nouns indicating animate beings, namely capable of intentional motion or action, while the second class includes inanimate objects or entities. As a rule, we can sketch out the following scheme:

  • 1st class: human beings, animals, deities
  • 2nd class: plants, objects, ideas, feelings, senses, perceptions

A noun is not irreversibly included in one of the two classes, as nouns lack clear morphological marks for each class.

For example, the word sɑño, light, shifts from a class to the other during the history of the language, as the noun ñowe, love, depending on the overall cultural perception of the noun’s animateness degree.

Despite the general lack of morphological markers in the basic forms, being thus unable to distinguish the two classes, the declension patterns depend on which class a noun belongs to.

There are two morphological numbers for almost all nouns, singular and plural.

Cases

Kī́rtako nouns do decline, according to an active-stative system with 9 cases:

Case
Meaning
Agentive This case marks primarily the subject of a transitive verb. It is also used to mark the subject of an intransitive verb, which displays a certain degree of activity, will or intention in performing the said action or in being in a certain state. It can be used only with nouns belonging to the 1st class.
Passive This case marks primarily the direct object of a transitive verb. It is also used to mark the subject of an intransitive verb, which displays no degree of activity, will or intention in performing the said action or in being in a certain state. It is regarded as the base form of the noun, and it is used as the vocative form.
Ablative This case marks primarily a natural and unintentional belonging (for example, body parts), without any sign of will of possession, or an inverse belonging. It also marks the point of origin of a movement (motion from a place). It is also used to mark the direct object of an infinitival form of a verb, marking thus the direct object of the negated form of a transitive verb.
Genitive This case marks an intentional possession, from subjects with a clear and active will. It can be used only with nouns belonging to the 1st class.
Dative This case marks primarily the indirect object. It can also mark the final point of a movement (motion toward a place), and, in a broad sense, the final purpose of an action or a state.
Causative This case marks the reason or the cause, which are the source of an action or a state.
Instrumental This case marks the tool or the instrument which are used to perform an action or to be in a certain state. It can be used only with nouns belonging to the 2nd class.
Abessive This case marks the tool or the instrument which are absent while performing an action or being in a certain state. It can be used only with nouns belonging to the 2nd class.
Locative This case marks the place where an action is performed, or a certain state exist (stative location). It can also have a temporal value. It can be used only with nouns belonging to the 2nd class.

The cases are usually classified in 4 groups:

  1. Primary main cases: agentive, genitive
  2. Secondary main cases: passive, ablative
  3. Primary oblique cases: dative, causative
  4. Secondary oblique cases: instrumental, abessive, locative

Other types of clause complements are conveyed using various postpositions, which can select one or more cases.

Noun declension

Nouns are declined for case and number by adding the following endings to the base form of the noun:

1st class
2nd class
singular
plural
singular
plural
agentive
-li -noli
passive
- -no - -no
ablative
-šu -nošu -šu -nošu
genitive
-ra -nora
dative
-ɣɑ -noɣɑ -ɣɑ -noɣɑ
causative
-khu -nokhu -khu -nokhu
instrumental
-khɑ -nokhɑ
abessive
-gil -nogil
locative
-tsar -notsar

Some examples are shown below: a 1st class noun, papu, father, and a 2nd class noun, sṓgo, house.

papu
sṓgo
singular
plural
singular
plural
agentive
papuli papunoli
ablative
papu papuno sṓgo sṓgono
passive
papušu papunošu sṓgošu sṓgonošu
genitive
papura papunora
dative
papuɣɑ papunoɣɑ sṓgoɣɑ sṓgonoɣɑ
causative
papukhu papunokhu sṓgokhu sṓgonokhu
instrumental
sṓgokhɑ sṓgonokhɑ
abessive
sṓgogil sṓgonogil
locative
sṓgotsar sṓgonotsar

As for the rules, the endings for the secondary oblique cases cannot be added to a 1st class noun, while the endings for the primary main cases cannot be added to a 2nd class noun.

Adjectives and pronouns

Adjectives closely resemble the noun form, mostly ending in a vowel and showing the same exceptions of nouns. Pronouns, instead, may exhibit different forms in the root form.

Adjectives

Attributive adjectives are always placed before the nouns they specify, while predicative adjectives are always placed after them.

jṓpā́ wī́ro
(the) young man
wī́ro jṓpā́ (ʔɑñ)
(the) man is young

As the verbal copula, ʔɑñɑme, to be, can be omitted when the subject is expressed in the clause, the attributive or predicative role of an adjective can be inferred only by its own position.

All adjectives agree in case and number with the noun they specify, being declined with the nominal endings. They thus display a complete declension set, not belonging inherently to one of the two classes.

jṓpā́ra wī́rora rḗʔo sṓgo pinkotsar wɑkitsar mḗʔis
the young man’s new house is located in the nearby village

Declension of qualifying adjectives

Example: rḗʔo, new

rḗʔo
singular
plural
agentive
rḗʔoli rḗʔonoli
passive
rḗʔo rḗʔono
ablative
rḗʔošu rḗʔonošu
genitive
rḗʔora rḗʔonora
dative
rḗʔoɣɑ rḗʔonoɣɑ
causative
rḗʔokhu rḗʔonokhu
instrumental
rḗʔokhɑ rḗʔonokhɑ
abessive
rḗʔogil rḗʔonogil
locative
rḗʔotsar rḗʔonotsar

Comparison of qualifying adjectives

Adjectives have two comparison forms, comparative and superlative. They are formed by adding the following endings: Example: rḗʔo, new

comparative
-rṓ
superlative
-rṓtu

These ending are always placed before the case endings. The second comparative term is in the ablative case and is followed by the postposition phɑw.

wī́ro ʔṓnašu phɑw jṓpā́rṓ (ʔɑñ)
the man is younger than the woman
ʔṓna owtunošu phɑw jṓpā́rṓtu (ʔɑñ)
the woman is the youngest of/among us

Personal pronouns

Personal pronouns display a marked dichotomy between the first two person (1st and 2nd) and the 3rd person.

Both the first and the second person have indeed two different roots, exhibiting thus a mixed declension; more than one form for each case is created on both roots. On the other hand, the third person has only one root.

1st person sing.
2nd person sing.
3rd person sing.
1st person plur.
2nd person plur.
3rd person plur.
agentive
owtu ertu ɑktuli owtuno ertuno ɑktunoli
passive
jo ɑktu jono nɑno ɑktuno
ablative
owtušu ertušu ɑktušu owtunošu ertunošu ɑktunošu
jošu nɑšu jonošu nɑnošu
genitive
owtura ertura ɑktura owtunora ertunora ɑktunora
jora nɑra jonora nɑnora
dative
joɣɑ nɑɣɑ ɑktuɣɑ jonoɣɑ nɑnoɣɑ ɑktunoɣɑ
causative
jokhu nɑkhu ɑktukhu jonokhu nɑnokhu ɑktunokhu
instrumental
ɑktukhɑ ɑktunokhɑ
abessive
ɑktugil ɑktunogil
locative
ɑktutsar ɑktunotsar

First and second person forms are meant as referents for 1st class entities; the endings for the secondary oblique cases are thus not used with them. Conversely, the third person forms display a complete declension, in which the case forms are used whether the referred name belongs to the 1st or the 2nd class.

In the pre-classical period another form for the third person, nigtu, is also used. This form is used in an obviative relationship with the form ɑktu, but it has already disappeared in the classical period.

1st and 2nd person pronouns have two forms in the ablative and in the genitive case. These forms are distinguished between broad forms (owtušu, ertušu,...) and narrow forms (jošu, nɑšu,...), which have a different use:

  • In the ablative case:
    • Broad form: it is used as the ablative form of the pronoun, in the main meanings of the case and with postpositions. It is also used to mark belonging (according to the role of the ablative case), playing the role of an indeclinable possessive adjective or pronoun.
ertunošu papu ʔalolī́ponow
we saw your father
    • Narrow form: it is mostly used as a direct object form for verbal infinitives and in negative sentences.
nɑšu hṓthī́niñɑme ʔaʔī́sow
I wasn't looking for you
  • In the genitive case:
    • Broad form: it is used to mark strictly possession, playing the role of an indeclinable possessive adjective or pronoun..
ertunora sṓgo ʔalolī́ponow
we saw your house
    • Narrow form: it is mostly used with postpositions.
nɑra ʔḕ kogiwow
I'm going to come with you

Especially in the genitive case these roles are not unchangeably fixed, but they can shift meaning during the entire history of the language: is it indeed not impossibile to find the narrow forms with a possessive role in the later period.

Demonstrative adjectives and pronouns

The forms of the possessive adjectives are the following:

  • that: ɑktuko
  • this: niktuko

Demonstrative pronouns exhibit, instead, different forms:

  • that one: ɑwo
  • this one: niwo

Interrogative pronouns

Basic interrogative pronouns display two different forms: one for animate entities (who?) and one for inanimate entities (what?).

  • what: šɑ
  • who: šā́

Both pronouns can be declined, with the nominal declension endings, according to their animacy class.

šā́ɣɑ om pike ʔakowɑker
whom did you give water to?

However, while the animate class pronoun keeps its original meaning when declined, the inanimate class pronouns usually acquire new meanings, depending on the selected case:

  • šɑtsar: where (static location)
  • šɑɣɑ: where (motion toward)
  • šɑšu: where... from (motion form)
  • šɑkhu: why (cause)

All forms can, nevertheless, keep their original meaning of “what”:

šɑšu lolī́piñame om ʔaʔī́ser
what didn’t you see?

The various meanings of the declined forms can be usually inferred by the context of the sentence.

There are also other interrogative adjectives and pronouns (and adverbs):

  • šā́ko: which (animate)
  • šɑko: which (inanimate)
  • šɑjuʔṓ: when
  • šā́mine: how much (animate)
  • šā́mineko: how much / many (animate)
  • šɑmine: how much (inanimate)
  • šɑmineko: how much / many (inanimate)
  • šɑmɑgi: how

Example:

šā́minekono gū́ʔetino totirer
how many horses do you own?

Inside of an interrogative clause, pronouns usually stay in their syntactical position, according to their role, but in the later period they tend to be moved at the beginning of the sentence. In addition, like other parts of the sentences, can be followed by postpositions:

šā́ɣɑ gū́ om tsɑgewuger
whom are you talking about?

Relative pronoun

There is only one form of relative pronoun:

  • hī́

This form displays a complete declension, in which the case forms are used whether the referred name belongs to the 1st or the 2nd class.

Indefinite adjectives and pronouns

There are three basic forms of indefinite adjectives:

  • jḗʔo: every
  • mṓwū́: some, any
  • hḗsu: no

The form of the adjective mṓwū́ is diachronically irregular; in the pre-classical period is indeed regularly mowū́. In the same period these adjectives do not agree with the nouns they specify, and they are usually found in an undeclined form.

This kind of adjectives can usually mark both an undefined quality and a quantity regarding the nouns they specify. When marking quantity, they always agree with their name in singular number. When marking quality, however, they can also agree with nouns in the plural.

jḗʔo wɑki
every village (all the villages)

There are, also, two basic forms of indefinite pronouns:

  • pā́mo: much, many, a lot
  • sī́pā́: few, a little, a few

These pronouns usually mark an undefined quantity of the entities, indicated by the nouns they specify. They exhibit a particular construction: these indefinite pronouns stay always in the singular number, while the nouns they specify are declined always in the ablative case. In this construction a greater role is played by the distinction between countable and uncountable nouns. Countable nouns are usually required in the plural number, while uncountable nouns are required in the singular number by this kind of pronouns.

pā́mo mā́sonošu
many mice, a lot of mice
sī́pā́ pikešu
a little water

The syntactic role of the noun cluster is conveyed by the indefinite pronouns, which are thus properly declined. The number of the cluster, however, is not expressed by them and stays in the singular. The verb of the sentence, if needed, agrees with the indefinite subject noun cluster in the singular number.

pā́moli wī́ronošu rā́no mṓtsatɑt
a lot of men are collecting milk

The declension class of the two pronouns, nevertheless, depends on the class of the nouns they specify.

There are, also, several other forms of indefinite pronouns (and adverbs), mostly derived by merging the indefinite adjectives with other nouns or pronouns:

  • jḗšɑ: everything, all, all things (inanimate - 2nd class)
  • jḗšā́: everyone, everybody (animate - 1st class)
  • jḗphū́ka: everyone, each one (animate - 1st class)
  • jḗrā́ʔi: everything, each thing (inanimate - 2nd class)
  • jḗjuʔṓ: every moment, always (invariable)
  • jḗjuʔṓɣɑ: per sempre (invariable)
  • mṓwū́šɑ: something (inanimate - 2nd class)
  • mṓwū́šā́: someone, somebody (animate - 1st class)
  • mṓwū́phū́ka: someone, somebody (animate - 1st class)
  • mṓwū́rā́ʔi: something (inanimate - 2nd class)
  • mṓwū́pošɑ: something (inanimate - 2nd class)
  • mṓwū́pošā́: someone, somebody (animate - 1st class)
  • mṓwū́juʔṓ: sometimes (invariable)
  • mṓwū́pojuʔṓ: sometimes (invariable)
  • hḗšɑ: nothing (inanimate - 2nd class)
  • hḗšā́: no one, nobody (animate - 1st class)
  • hḗphū́ka: no one, nobody (animate - 1st class)
  • hḗrā́ʔi: nothing (inanimate - 2nd class)
  • hḗjuʔṓ: in no moment, never (invariable)

These pronouns, except the invariable ones, can be declined according to their animacy class.

Adverbs

There is a limited number of pure adverbial forms, like ʔū́mtu, inside, or ʔḗhlo, together, mostly akin to postpositions, both for their origin and their meaning.

Generally, adjectives can be used as adverbs by simply putting them before the verb in their undeclined form (which works well also with temporal indefinite adjectives).

Another way to derive an adverbial form from an adjectives is the construction ADJ-tsar mɑgitsar, which means in a ADJ way, AGG-ly. This construction has, however, a strongly marked meaning and usage.

The adverbial use of the adjectives can involve the comparison forms.

Postpositions

In the Kī́rtako language a noun cluster can be followed by a postposition, which gives a new meaning to the case of the selected noun cluster. Thus, every possible clause complements can be effectively expressed.

All postposition are always placed after the noun they specify. Most postposition share a similar origin with the adverbial forms, while some postposition originated from fixed case forms of nouns.

General list of postpositions

Each postposition tends to follow a noun cluster, which is declined in one grammatical case. Thus it is said that each postposition governs a specific case.

Most postpositions govern only one case, while some other postpositions govern more than one, while slightly altering their meaning depending on the selected case (like kī́g).

case meaning
ʔḕ + genitive with, together with (marking company)
hā́k + ablative from, native to (marking origin)
jɑl + ablative from, coming from (marking a departure point)
sū̀ + dative for, aiming to (marking purpose)
kī́g + instrumental by, with, by means of (marking instrument)
+ ablative by way of, using (marking exploiting)
phes + ablative without, in the absence of (marking absence)
kṓw + dative towards, in the direction of (marking direction)
phɑw + ablative in relation to (marking relation)
mɑg + passive in comparison to, like, as (marking comparison)
gū́ + dative about, regarding, concerning (marking topic, theme)
pḗr + dative through, throughout, across (marking from a side to the other)
phun + locative/genitive after (temporal value)
roš + locative/genitive before (temporal value)
wū́g + ablative away, away from (marking distancing)
pṓtu + dative against, in opposition to (marking opposition)

Some postpositions conveying location or motion make use of different case to specify a static location (locative or passive case), a motion towards a place (dative case) or a motion from a place (ablative case). Such postpositions are called locative postpositions:

case meaning
ʔū́m + locative/passive/dative/ablative inside of
sā̀ + locative/passive/dative/ablative outside of
wim + locative/passive/dative/ablative under
git + locative/passive/dative/ablative over, on
pig + locative/passive/dative/ablative near
phṓr + locative/passive/dative/ablative in front of, opposite
šom + locative/passive/dative/ablative behind
tī́n + locative/passive/dative/ablative between, among
ʔī́r + locative/passive/dative/ablative around

A clear explanation of each postposition is presented in the following section.

ʔḕ

The postposition ʔḕ conveys the meaning of the complement of company. It specifies an entity, together with which a certain action is performed or a certain state exists.

sṓgoɣɑ owtušu kogā́tinora ʔḕ ʔaʔḗmiɣow
I went home with my friends

This postposition always governs the genitive case.

It never conveys the instrument, by which the action is performed; this function is expressed by the instrumental case or by the postposition kī́g. Thus, this postposition is never used with a 2nd class noun.

hā́k

The postposition hā́k conveys the meaning of the complement of origin. It specifies the original point of an action or a state.

jo Kī́rtašu hā́k (ʔɑñow)
I am from Kī́rta. (It is my birthplace)

This postposition always governs the ablative case.

It can however convey, especially in later texts, the general meaning of motion from a place, in other words, the beginning point of a motion of any kind. Such use is often confused with the postposition jɑl.

sṓgošu hā́k ʔawɑpū́kow
I departed from the house. (my motion began from that place)

In the classical period, this last role is played directly by the ablative case alone.

sṓgošu ʔawɑpū́kow
I departed from the house. (my motion began from that place)

jɑl

The postposition jɑl conveys the meaning of the complement of provenience. It specifies the beginning point of an action or a state which can have more than one direction.

Kī́rtašu jɑl kigowow
I came from Kī́rta. (my travel began in that city)

This postposition always governs the ablative case.

It can however convey, especially in later texts, the general meaning of motion from a place, in other words, the beginning point of a motion of any kind. Such use is often confused with the postposition hā́k.

sṓgošu jɑl ʔawɑpū́kow
I departed from the house. (my motion began from that place)

In the classical period, this last role is played directly by the ablative case alone.

sṓgošu ʔawɑpū́kow
I departed from the house. (my motion began from that place)