Latinization of Sohlob: Difference between revisions
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
The Heleb dialect has a distinct pair of front rounded vowels ''ü'' and ''ö'' pronounced {{IPA|[y]}} and {{IPA|[œ]}}. The Heleb counterpart pf '''æ''' is '''ä''' | The Heleb dialect has a distinct pair of front rounded vowels ''ü'' and ''ö'' pronounced {{IPA|[y]}} and {{IPA|[œ]}}. The Heleb counterpart pf '''æ''' is '''ä''' | ||
but this is only a difference in transcription. | but this is only a difference in transcription. | ||
Heleb has distinctive vowel length. Long vowels are transcribed with doubled vowel letters. | |||
'''e'''and '''a''' are fully back unrounded vowels {{IPA|[ɯ]}} and {{IPA|[ɑ]}} in Heleb. | '''e'''and '''a''' are fully back unrounded vowels {{IPA|[ɯ]}} and {{IPA|[ɑ]}} in Heleb. | ||
'''ll''' indicates a velar(ized) {{IPA|/ɫ/}} or {{IPA|/ʟ/}} distinct from palatal '''l''' {{IPA|/ʎ/}}. | '''ll''' indicates a velar(ized) {{IPA|/ɫ/}} or {{IPA|/ʟ/}} distinct from palatal '''l''' {{IPA|/ʎ/}}. This arose when front-back vowel harmony caused some formerly back vowels to become front and ''vice versa'', since formerly ''*l'' had had a palatal allophone before front vowels and a velar allophone before back vowels; this difference became phonemic as the liquid retained its old quality when the following vowel changed its front/back value. There was a similar allophony in ''*r'', but the palatal allophone merged with '''y'''. The remaining Heleb 'rhotic' '''r''' was probably realized as a retroflex fricative {{IPA|[ʐ]}} or {{IPA|[ɻ]}}. | ||
In the native script '''ll''' was written as {{Sohlob|rr}}, '''l''' as {{Sohlob|ir}} and '''r''' as {{Sohlob|r}}, if they were distinguished at all. | |||
[[Category:Sohlob]] | [[Category:Sohlob]] |
Revision as of 02:38, 16 September 2006
c is [tɕ]. Alternative transcriptions are tj and ch.
j is [dʑ] or [ʑ]. Alternative transcriptions are dj and zj. The [ʑ] zj variant occurs mainly before d. A j not preceded by any of the letters d, s, t, or z can only be /dʑ/, since in the ASCII transcription j is not used outside these digraphs.
ç is [ɕ]. Alternative transcriptions are sj and sh.
y is [j], except in Linjeb where it is actually the vowel [y]!
æ is (surprise ☺) [æ]. It may be written ae without confusion, since the rules of Sohlob vowel harmony don't allow a and e together in the same word.
e is [ɨ] in Classical Sohlob and Heleb. In Kidilib and Linjeb it is [ɛ].
o is [ɒ] in Classical Sohlob, Heleb and. Kidilib. In Linjeb it is [ɔ].
ny is [ɲ], except in Linjeb.
ng is [ŋ], except in ngr, which is actually [ŋɡr] and ngl, which is actually [ŋɡl].
hl is [ɬ].
hr (Kidilib) is [r̥] (voiceless trill).
çr (Classical Sohlob) is [ʂ].
hy (Kidilib) is [ç].
In Kidilib t, d, s before i, e are pronounced as c, j, ç, i.e. dentals and palatals merge before front vowels, and are pronounced as palatals but spelled as dentals in this position!
The letter ñ
Some may wonder that I don't use the letter ñ for ny [ɲ]. Alternately some people familiar with Tolkien's use of ñ for [ŋ] may wonder why I don't adopt that usage. The answer is, as you may already have guessed, exactly the fact that I've encountered conflicting usages of ñ, and so they make me confused, and I decided to use neither. In fact I do use ñ for Kijeb ŋ in my private vocabulary database, since it doesn't accomodate Unicode!
Heleb peculiarities
The Heleb dialect has a distinct pair of front rounded vowels ü and ö pronounced [y] and [œ]. The Heleb counterpart pf æ is ä but this is only a difference in transcription.
Heleb has distinctive vowel length. Long vowels are transcribed with doubled vowel letters.
eand a are fully back unrounded vowels [ɯ] and [ɑ] in Heleb.
ll indicates a velar(ized) /ɫ/ or /ʟ/ distinct from palatal l /ʎ/. This arose when front-back vowel harmony caused some formerly back vowels to become front and vice versa, since formerly *l had had a palatal allophone before front vowels and a velar allophone before back vowels; this difference became phonemic as the liquid retained its old quality when the following vowel changed its front/back value. There was a similar allophony in *r, but the palatal allophone merged with y. The remaining Heleb 'rhotic' r was probably realized as a retroflex fricative [ʐ] or [ɻ].
In the native script ll was written as rr, l as ir and r as r, if they were distinguished at all.