The wiki has recently been updated. Please contact me by talk page or email if you encounter any issues.

Leaper/Apple: Difference between revisions

From FrathWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
Line 14: Line 14:
See above; for the meantime the phonology is undetermined beyond the design goals itemized above.
See above; for the meantime the phonology is undetermined beyond the design goals itemized above.


 
===Diachronics from Khulls===
The eight laryngrals of Khulls were ''x xʷ g gʷ h hʷ ʕ ʕʷ'', of which /ʕ/ was essentially a silent consonant that pharyngealized any stressed vowel that it touched.  /ʕʷ/, on the other hand, was an ordinary consonant that did not spread out to color surrounding vowels.  It is possible that Lokrika could change the behavior of one or both of these sounds.


==Grammar==
==Grammar==

Revision as of 09:59, 26 January 2017

Lòkrika is the name of a language descended from Khulls that comes to superficially resemble Proto-Indo-European by shedding some of its dorsal fricatives, thus increasing the prominence among the fricatives of the previously rare s, but retaining enough dorsal fricatives to remind the listener of the Proto-Indo-European laryngeals. Additionally, Lòkriki distinguishes labialization on some of its stops, but not its nasals or sonorants. There are no palatals.[1] There are no voiced aspirates. However, as in Khulls, it is very likely that voiceless aspirates will be far more common than any other stop series.

Lokrika will probably remain a tonal language, but with a somewhat reduced system and a stress pattern that limits tone to just one syllable per word. I don't believe that PIE was a tonal language, but it is very difficult for Khulls to lose tone without creating massive ambiguity. Note that unlike PIE, Khulls typically has very short word roots, and approaches oligosynthesis. This is a feature I intend to retain in Lokrika. Thus, Lokrika may resemble PIE in its phonology, but not in its grammar or lexicon. (Note that all languages I create are entirely a priori.)

My intention is for Lokrika to be fairly close in time to Khulls, thus leaving time to branch off daughter languages that resemble early IE languages the way that Lokrika resembles PIE. These will round out Lokrika's unstable vowel system by deleting the remaining laryngeals, after first using them to allophonically color surrounding vowels.

There will probably be no ablaut, and no distinction between /kw/ and /kʷ/ or like sequences. However, such distinctions may appear in the daughter languages.

Lokrika will likely need to abandon Khulls' "mend and blend" sandhi operation, which took disharmonious consonant sequences such as /xʷn/ and "repaired" them into harmonious clusters like /nkʷ/, or in some cases into single consonants.

Lokrika probably retains the Khulls distinction between /p ṗ b/ and /pʷ ṗʷ bʷ/ since it would be unlikely for such a contrast to disappear without also losing the distinction between the corresponding velar series.

Phonology

See above; for the meantime the phonology is undetermined beyond the design goals itemized above.

Diachronics from Khulls

The eight laryngrals of Khulls were x xʷ g gʷ h hʷ ʕ ʕʷ, of which /ʕ/ was essentially a silent consonant that pharyngealized any stressed vowel that it touched. /ʕʷ/, on the other hand, was an ordinary consonant that did not spread out to color surrounding vowels. It is possible that Lokrika could change the behavior of one or both of these sounds.

Grammar

Noun gender is retained. The basic grammar of Khulls is mostly intact, which means that it does not resemble PIE whatsoever.

Notes

  1. Note that I dont believe that PIE ever had palatals or palatovelars either.