Poswa nouns: Difference between revisions

From FrathWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 82: Line 82:


====Other irregular nouns====
====Other irregular nouns====
But most irregular nouns are not words for body parts.  For example, the locative of the word '''blem''' "bottle" is not the expected ''*blidžem'' or ''*bledžem'' but '''miam'''.  Similarly, the accusative of '''blub''' "milk" is not ''*blup'' or ''*blop'' or even something like ''*miop'' (in the manner of ''blem'' above), but '''blwop'''.  One-syllable words often change their entire form to an alternate stem for case endings.  These words are often also irregular with other suffixes such as the "illative", which is not normally considered a case.  Thus to say "Pour the milk '''into the bottle'''!"  one would say ''Blwop '''mivwam''' gwubi!''
But most irregular nouns are not words for body parts.  For example, the locative of the word '''blem''' "bottle" is not the expected ''*blidžem'' or ''*bledžem'' but '''miam'''.  Similarly, the accusative of '''blub''' "milk" is not ''*blup'' or ''*blop'' or even something like ''*miop'' (in the manner of ''blem'' above), but '''blwop'''.  One-syllable words often change their entire form to an alternate stem for case endings.  These words are often also irregular with other suffixes such as the "illative", which is not normally considered a case.  Thus to say "Pour the milk '''into the bottle'''!"  one would say ''Blwop '''mivwam''' gwubi!'' However, note that there is also a specific verb meaning "to pour into a bottle; to bottle" which would yield the more regular-looking sentence ''Blwop blembwubi!''  In this sentence, the verb ''nu'' "to pour" mutates into ''bw'' but protects the "bottle" word from its own mutation.


Most of the irregular nouns can be more easily understood if a second stem is perceived that appears on every case except the nominative, and which declines according to otherwise normal rules.  This system works well because, while there are a lot of irregular nouns in Poswa, very few of them are irregular in more than one way.  For example, '''blem''' behaves chaotically from the point of view of its main stem of ''blem'', but is perfectly normal if one thinks of an alternative stem ''*mia''.  Likewise, if '''blub''' "milk" is replaced with an otherwise nonexistent ''*blwu'', it too declines regularly according to the patterns expected of such a noun (although since there are two ''-u'' classes, one would still not know which of the two patterns to place ''blub'' into without already knowing the other forms).
Most of the irregular nouns can be more easily understood if a second stem is perceived that appears on every case except the nominative, and which declines according to otherwise normal rules.  This system works well because, while there are a lot of irregular nouns in Poswa, very few of them are irregular in more than one way.  For example, '''blem''' behaves chaotically from the point of view of its main stem of ''blem'', but is perfectly normal if one thinks of an alternative stem ''*mia''.  Likewise, if '''blub''' "milk" is replaced with an otherwise nonexistent ''*blwu'', it too declines regularly according to the patterns expected of such a noun (although since there are two ''-u'' classes, one would still not know which of the two patterns to place ''blub'' into without already knowing the other forms).

Revision as of 07:47, 25 February 2016

Poswa preserves the six noun cases of the parent language with almost no changes in meaning or form, apart from regular sound changes. The possessive has weakened into a genitive when used with definite nouns, however. e.g. teppiopwas mupawabub "the length of the rope". Poswa has not added any new cases; so there is still no dative case and the various uses of the locative case are not distinguished.

  • Nominative: The default form of the word, used as the subject of a sentence and also in genitive phrases when not indicating possession; paslam "fire"; paslam boša "fire hearth; fireplace".
  • Accusative: Always marked by -p, shows the object of a verb. Žazba pasliap blabwambi "The girl put out the fire".


Number and animacy

Poswa distinguishes between animate and inanimate nouns, but there is no grammatical marker distinguishing the two; they simply must be learned. However, in nearly all cases, the difference follows semantics, so this is not a source of difficulty for students of Poswa.

Plural suffixes

There is no "grammatical" plural in Poswa in the sense that there is not a separate table of forms for plural nouns in each declension. To pluralize a noun, either -by or -bum is added. The difference between the two is that -by implies separation amongst the individual items being described, whereas -bum implies that they are working together. An animate noun can take either of the two suffixes depending on which meaning is intended; inanimate nouns have a fixed plural form, however, in a manner similar to the way nouns have genders in Spanish and some IE languages. Learning the pattern here is much more difficult than learning the difference between animate and inanimate nouns because there is no significant connection between the semantic meaning of a noun and the categorization of that noun as belonging to the -by or the -bum class. Such words are simply called "by nouns" (blwaššum) and "bum nouns" (bumblaššum) in Poswa.

The -by and -bum suffixes interact with the nouns they modify, particularly those ending in voiceless consonants, using the same sound rules that other compounds do. For example, the noun paspys "square" pluralizes to paspyžbum because of a sound rule automatically changing all sb to žb. Poppup "knife" changes to poppubum because of a sound rule automatically changing all pb to bb and another one causing the simplification of the second of two consecutive geminate consonants. The -by suffix merges in different ways.

Loanwords are generally placed into the bum class, making it the more productive of the two. A small number of native words have changed class over time, often due to reanalysis. For example, the native word for "rain" was pleb, a regular development from Babakiam piyu. But this came to be seen as a plural consisting of a dummy stem ple and the plural suffix -by (the final y is usually ommitted in Romanization, as there are no words with a plain final -b.) Thus a new word, ple, meaning "raindrop" was coined, which has no Bābākiam form. Then, a new plural plebum came to be used for the more common noun "rain", and pleb fell out of use. A similar story explains what happened to the commonest word for an army. Originally, the word for army was pamby, a regular development from Bābākiam pamimiu. This was a singular noun. However, it came to be reanalyzed as a plural, and given that the -by suffix generally denoted things that were seen as separate pieces, not part of a greater whole, the word was changed to pambum to reflect a unified army. Note that this new word has no singular form, and that "double plural" forms such as *pambumbum used to mean "armies (plural)" are considered inappropriate. Instead the pambum word is used with a modifier meaning "several", "many", or whichever meaning is intended.

Singulatives

From nouns that denote crowds or mass nouns, a singulative suffix -ba can be added to denote one piece or one member of it. For example mabem means "soap", and mabemba means "a bit of soap; some soap (to clean with)". Note that this -ba suffix is derived from Bābākiam viba, not ba, and therefore does not collapse the way some other suffixes beginning with -b do; the /b/ remains always a /b/.

Animacy

Note that body parts, and inalienable nouns in general, inherit their animacy from an implicit "parent noun", and therefore are understood as animate nouns in any context, even if the person whose body they belong to is a corpse or a doll.

In a very old stage of the language, an infix -a could be inserted into any inanimate noun to make it an animate one. A few doublets still survive, but this infix was never used often and few speakers are aware of its former existence.

Possession

Possession markers can be placed on any noun, e.g. papwopwa "dog"; papwopio "my dog"; poppup "knife" ---> poppuwio "my knife". The stem to which the possession marker attaches is called a soppu. These are historically related to the verbal inflections and thus can be mapped one-to-one with them; however, they behave as nouns.

Noun declensions

Noun declensions are complicated by the fact that unlike Poswa verbs, Poswa nouns change even the stem when an inflectional suffix is added. That is, there is no "barrier" between the stem and the suffix that keeps the stem mostly intact. Instead of declensional tables, the entire last syllable must be taken into account in order to determine the various forms. Thus it could be said that there is a declension for every syllable. However, with just a few simple rules, the patterns can be easily perceived.

Regular nouns

-a

The commonest noun declension is for nouns ending in -a. Below is the declension of pliopa "waste pail, trash can" (long words are used to prevent the suffixes from infecting the stem). For possession, 3rd person is used:

pliopa
Case Free Possessed(1p)
Nominative pliopa pliofa
Accusative pliopap pliofap
Locative pliopam pliofam
Possessive pliopas pliofas
Essive pliopel pliofel
Instrumental pliopob pliofob

Irregular nouns

Poswa has many irregular nouns. Most of these are single-syllable nouns whose entire stem changes because the various suffixes placed after it "infect" the stem by causing various sound changes which were never ironed out. Many suffixes are really historically infixes, after all, and in the early stages of the language, when it was still known as Babakiam, an infix that changed even the initial consonant of a noun would not have been seen as irregular.

Body parts and suppletive plurals

Many words for body parts have suppletive plurals. Poswa nouns in general are not marked for number; the plural suffixes -by and -bum are not required to specifically mark out a noun as plural; they are often used to specify the "type" of plural being spoken about. On the other hand, words for some body parts are specifically used with a meaning specifying number. For example, pep means "hand" (singular), pwop means "hands" (dual), and pes means "hands" (plural). The difference between the dual and the plural in this context is that pwop is used with the meaning "both (of your) hands" whereas pes is used for any number of hands greater than one, without specifying whether they belong to the same person or not. Thus two people shaking hands have pes, but one person pulling a metal chain with both of his hands is using his pwop.

Many of these suppletive word families are short words, and are irregular in terms of their noun declensions as well. For example, the accusative form of lwep "thumb" is not the expected *lwetšep but lattšep. In Bābākiam, this pattern was perfectly regular, but it was never regularized as the sound changes destroyed the original pattern. (Note that the word for thumb is more commonly tšolwep, but the accusative of this is still tšolattšep, maintaining the same irregular pattern.)

Other irregular nouns

But most irregular nouns are not words for body parts. For example, the locative of the word blem "bottle" is not the expected *blidžem or *bledžem but miam. Similarly, the accusative of blub "milk" is not *blup or *blop or even something like *miop (in the manner of blem above), but blwop. One-syllable words often change their entire form to an alternate stem for case endings. These words are often also irregular with other suffixes such as the "illative", which is not normally considered a case. Thus to say "Pour the milk into the bottle!" one would say Blwop mivwam gwubi! However, note that there is also a specific verb meaning "to pour into a bottle; to bottle" which would yield the more regular-looking sentence Blwop blembwubi! In this sentence, the verb nu "to pour" mutates into bw but protects the "bottle" word from its own mutation.

Most of the irregular nouns can be more easily understood if a second stem is perceived that appears on every case except the nominative, and which declines according to otherwise normal rules. This system works well because, while there are a lot of irregular nouns in Poswa, very few of them are irregular in more than one way. For example, blem behaves chaotically from the point of view of its main stem of blem, but is perfectly normal if one thinks of an alternative stem *mia. Likewise, if blub "milk" is replaced with an otherwise nonexistent *blwu, it too declines regularly according to the patterns expected of such a noun (although since there are two -u classes, one would still not know which of the two patterns to place blub into without already knowing the other forms).

Mistaken identity

Unlike many IE languages, there is no suffix for the nominative case. Thus it cannot be known for certain what case a noun seen in isolation is in. For example, twup means "louse", but it is also the accusative case of twub "urine", which is etymologically unrelated. The accusative of twup is also twup, one of only a few such words in Poswa. Also unrelated is twu "water", whose accusative is twop but which has an instrumental case in twub. Meanwhile there is also the plural suffix -by, usually Romanized as just a -b after a vowel. Thus twub can mean "urine", "using water", or "waters". However the third use is uncommon because water is seen as a mass noun, and would only make sense in a situation comparing, for example, the water quality of several different lakes.