Talk:Rosicrucianism (The Elvenpath): Difference between revisions
From FrathWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
WeepingElf (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Very interesting stuff in here! I hope you'll keep working on the details. In general scope, this Rosicrucianism sounds like it might be better aligned with Unitarianism, or at least a non-trinitarian Christianity, rather than the much more common trinitarian Christianity. Is the Gospel of Joseph of Arimathaea synonymous with *here*'s Narrative of Joseph of Arimathaea (http://www.pseudepigrapha.com/apocrypha_nt/narjoe.htm) or entirely different? (Some bits of this latter are rather anti-semitic, mind -- I don't know if the Rosicrucians follow suit in that regard or not!) If different, have you devised any passages or longer segments? [[User:Elemtilas|Elemtilas]] 20:03, 20 April 2013 (PDT) | Very interesting stuff in here! I hope you'll keep working on the details. In general scope, this Rosicrucianism sounds like it might be better aligned with Unitarianism, or at least a non-trinitarian Christianity, rather than the much more common trinitarian Christianity. Is the Gospel of Joseph of Arimathaea synonymous with *here*'s Narrative of Joseph of Arimathaea (http://www.pseudepigrapha.com/apocrypha_nt/narjoe.htm) or entirely different? (Some bits of this latter are rather anti-semitic, mind -- I don't know if the Rosicrucians follow suit in that regard or not!) If different, have you devised any passages or longer segments? [[User:Elemtilas|Elemtilas]] 20:03, 20 April 2013 (PDT) | ||
: Rosicrucianism indeed is non-trinitarian. But the Gospel of Joseph of Arimathea is not the same text as the Narrative of Joseph of Arimathea; it is entirely different (the Narrative, after all, is, or I perceive it to be, trinitarian, for instance). I have not written it yet, though I have some ideas about its contents. At any rate, the Rosicrucian church is not antisemitic! --[[User:WeepingElf|WeepingElf]] 05:24, 21 April 2013 (PDT) | |||
Revision as of 04:24, 21 April 2013
Very interesting stuff in here! I hope you'll keep working on the details. In general scope, this Rosicrucianism sounds like it might be better aligned with Unitarianism, or at least a non-trinitarian Christianity, rather than the much more common trinitarian Christianity. Is the Gospel of Joseph of Arimathaea synonymous with *here*'s Narrative of Joseph of Arimathaea (http://www.pseudepigrapha.com/apocrypha_nt/narjoe.htm) or entirely different? (Some bits of this latter are rather anti-semitic, mind -- I don't know if the Rosicrucians follow suit in that regard or not!) If different, have you devised any passages or longer segments? Elemtilas 20:03, 20 April 2013 (PDT)
- Rosicrucianism indeed is non-trinitarian. But the Gospel of Joseph of Arimathea is not the same text as the Narrative of Joseph of Arimathea; it is entirely different (the Narrative, after all, is, or I perceive it to be, trinitarian, for instance). I have not written it yet, though I have some ideas about its contents. At any rate, the Rosicrucian church is not antisemitic! --WeepingElf 05:24, 21 April 2013 (PDT)
