Khanty: Difference between revisions

From FrathWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary
Line 33: Line 33:
! !! Vax-Vasjugan !! Tremjugan-Jugan !! Demj-Konda !! Nizjam !! Kazym !! Obdorsk !! vs. [[Mansi]] !! Notes
! !! Vax-Vasjugan !! Tremjugan-Jugan !! Demj-Konda !! Nizjam !! Kazym !! Obdorsk !! vs. [[Mansi]] !! Notes
|-
|-
| *uu || uu || uu || yy, uuˠ || u || u || uu || *uu ([oo]?)
| *uu₁ || uu || uu || yy, uuˠ || u || u || uu || *uu ([oo]?)
|-
|-
| *ɯɯ || ɯɯ || ɯɯ || ii, eeˠ ||rowspan="3"| i ||rowspan="3"| i ||rowspan="3"| ii || *ɯɯ ([ɤɤ]?), *a
| *ɯɯ || ɯɯ || ɯɯ || ii, eeˠ ||rowspan="3"| i ||rowspan="3"| i ||rowspan="3"| ii || *ɯɯ ([ɤɤ]?), *a
|-
|-
| *ii || ii || ii ||rowspan="2"| ii || *ii ([ee]?)
| *ii₁ || ii || ii ||rowspan="2"| ii || *ii ([ee]?)
|-
|-
| *yy || yy || iiʷ
| *yy || yy || iiʷ
| Mainly from ii₁ / _ɣ (*čüüɣ *süüɣəs *lüüɣət *tüüɣət *süüɣ *müüɣ *püüɣəɬ), sometimes *k_ ( *küül- *küüĺ *küüli *küüm)
|-
|-
| *oo₁ || oo || o, a ||rowspan="3"| uu, ooˠ ||rowspan="3"| uu ||rowspan="3"| (w)oo ||rowspan="3"| oo || *aa, *a, *å
| *oo || oo || o, a ||rowspan="3"| uu, ooˠ ||rowspan="3"| uu ||rowspan="3"| (w)oo ||rowspan="3"| oo || *aa, *a, *å
| Živlov: *a
| Živlov: *a
|-
|-
| *oo₂ || uu || uu ||  
| *uu₂ || uu || uu ||  
| Živlov: *oo
| Živlov: *oo
|-
|-
Line 51: Line 52:
| *ɑɑ || ɑɑ || ɒɒ || oo, ɑɑˠ || ɔɔ || ɔɔ || ɑɑ || *ɯɯ, *ɑɑ
| *ɑɑ || ɑɑ || ɒɒ || oo, ɑɑˠ || ɔɔ || ɔɔ || ɑɑ || *ɯɯ, *ɑɑ
|-
|-
| *ee₁ || ee, øøˠ || aa ||rowspan="3"| ee ||rowspan="3"| ee ||rowspan="3"| ee ||rowspan="3"| ee || *ää, *ä
| *ee || ee, øøˠ || aa ||rowspan="3"| ee ||rowspan="3"| ee ||rowspan="3"| ee ||rowspan="3"| ee || *ää, *ä
| Živlov: *ä
| Živlov: *ä
|-
|-
| *ee₂ || ii || ii ||
| *ii₂ || ii || ii ||
| Živlov: *ii; N&K (j)ee
| Živlov: *ii; N&K (j)ee
|-
|-
Line 77: Line 78:


There is an interesting anomaly in the treatment of the Proto-Uralic close vowels:
There is an interesting anomaly in the treatment of the Proto-Uralic close vowels:
* *i → *ee₁; *e before a cluster
* *i → *ee₁; *e before a cluster (barely any examples of the latter though)
* *u → *oo₁; *o before a cluster
* *u → *oo₁; *o before a cluster
* but: *ü → *ɵ uniformly (never **øø)
* but: *ü → *ɵ uniformly (never **øø)
Line 83: Line 84:
* *i → *ä
* *i → *ä
* *u → *å
* *u → *å
* *ü → *ä, but Northern Mansi ''ü''
* *ü → *ä, but Southern Mansi ''ü''
In common Ob-Ugric these were apparently lower'd to *e *o *ö. In NMs it seems *ö then re-raised to ''ü'' (elsewhere merging to *e and continuing to *ä). (This could be motivated by the typological rarity of having /ø/ but no /y/. New *i and *u did exist, but there was no new *ü.) NMs shares several innovations with the Khanty dialects; so, here it would seem that *ö also raised to *ü and was lower'd to *ɵ only later, akin to *e also partly deriving from common Ob-Ugric *i (← PU *ê). This may explain the *uu-like reflexes in Eastern Khanty as well.
In common Ob-Ugric these were apparently lower'd to *e *o *ö. In SMs it seems *ö then re-raised to ''ü'' (elsewhere merging to *e and continuing to *ä). (This could be motivated by the typological rarity of having /ø/ but no /y/. New *i and *u did exist, but there was no new *ü.)


(The vowel usually call'd *ï in PU yields mostly *ɯɯ or *ɑɑ and is better understood as a mid vowel, *ë [ɤ ~ ʌ])
(The vowel sometimes call'd *ï in PU yields mostly *ɯɯ or *ɑɑ and is better understood as a mid vowel, *ë [ɤ ~ ʌ])


===Isoglosses===
===Isoglosses===

Revision as of 04:02, 10 February 2013

Spoken in Western Siberia, Khanty forms the eastern half of the Ob-Ugric languages. It has usually been treated as a single language divided in many dialects, tho a division into a small family of 3-4 languages may be more appropriate. The historical phonology of Khanty has been problematic in Uralistics.

Consonants

  • s and *š develop into *ɬ unconditionally, while *ś depalatalizes to *s (common Ugric-Samoyedic developments).
  • ɬ assimilates to *s if the word contains another *s as well (*sükśɜ → #ɬüɣs → *söɣəs "autumn", *sopśə → #ɬåps → *saapəs "net needle"; Ugr. #ɬås → *soˑs- "to dry"). (*ć has no effect in #saŋśɜ- → *ɬɯɯnć- "to stand"; #śosra → *ćorəs "1000" could be a later loan)

In all dialects but that of Tremjugan (where initial *ɬ → /j/), *ɬ then merges with *l (including that from *ð). The core dialects' reflex is /l/; a few retain /ɬ/; the marginal Vax and Obdorsk 'lects have /t/ (as do Mansi and Smy.) A *ɬʲ also emerges (which is treated the same, modulo palatalization).

As in Mansi, *w *k *x all become *ɣ in *i-stems. After *t, *č, this yields a geminate that later simplifies. When occurring after a coronal (*ɬɣ *rɣ), it is metathesized (again only in *i-stems).

  • ðʲ becomes (as in Samoyedic) /j/, possibly thru an intermediate *ĺ (as in Mansi and Permic).

Retroflex *ɭ *ɳ sometimes appear for *l *n; the conditioning is not entirely clear but at least the presence of the pre-existing retroflex *č triggers this. Of note is that *ɭ does not fricate; rather, in the dialects where *l → ɬ/t, this becomes a new /l/.

Dialectal isoglosses tend to be shared with adjacent Mansi or Selkup dialects.

  • West Khanty:
    • *k → χ near back vowels (except… )
    • *č → š (further → s in Obdorsk, as also in Sosva Mansi)
    • *ć → s
  • East Khanty
  • *ć → tʲ

Vowels

Khanty dialects generally have a distinction between full and overshort vowels. This correlates with the long-short distinction of Mansi, and is transcribed here as geminate vs. single.

Many vowels develop different near to velar consonant, which is mark'd by <Vˠ>. Some dialects trigger labialization in following velars, markd by <Vʷ>.

Several paradigmatic vowel alternations (generally in height or length, such as *ɑɑ ~ *uu, or *e ~ *ee) occur in some varieties, that are generally thought to result from umlaut at a stage when there was a richer system of non-initial syllable vowels.

Vax-Vasjugan Tremjugan-Jugan Demj-Konda Nizjam Kazym Obdorsk vs. Mansi Notes
*uu₁ uu uu yy, uuˠ u u uu *uu ([oo]?)
*ɯɯ ɯɯ ɯɯ ii, eeˠ i i ii *ɯɯ ([ɤɤ]?), *a
*ii₁ ii ii ii *ii ([ee]?)
*yy yy iiʷ Mainly from ii₁ / _ɣ (*čüüɣ *süüɣəs *lüüɣət *tüüɣət *süüɣ *müüɣ *püüɣəɬ), sometimes *k_ ( *küül- *küüĺ *küüli *küüm)
*oo oo o, a uu, ooˠ uu (w)oo oo *aa, *a, *å Živlov: *a
*uu₂ uu uu Živlov: *oo
*ɔɔ ɔɔ oo
*ɑɑ ɑɑ ɒɒ oo, ɑɑˠ ɔɔ ɔɔ ɑɑ *ɯɯ, *ɑɑ
*ee ee, øøˠ aa ee ee ee ee *ää, *ä Živlov: *ä
*ii₂ ii ii Živlov: *ii; N&K (j)ee
*øø øø aa, ø Živlov: Split from *ee₁
*ææ ææ aa aa ɑɑ ɑɑ aa *ii Sammallahti: TJ /ɒɒ/ ? (typo å for ȧ?)
*ɶɶ œœ eeʷ Živlov: Konda & O. /oo/ / _k
*o o o ɑ o o ɑ *a, *å
ɑ ɑ Živlov: *ɯ (?!)
*e e e e ɑ ɑ a *i
ø ɵ, eʷ ɵ u u uu

There is an interesting anomaly in the treatment of the Proto-Uralic close vowels:

  • *i → *ee₁; *e before a cluster (barely any examples of the latter though)
  • *u → *oo₁; *o before a cluster
  • but: *ü → *ɵ uniformly (never **øø)

What seems to be going here starts unraveling once we compare the Mansi reflexes:

  • *i → *ä
  • *u → *å
  • *ü → *ä, but Southern Mansi ü

In common Ob-Ugric these were apparently lower'd to *e *o *ö. In SMs it seems *ö then re-raised to ü (elsewhere merging to *e and continuing to *ä). (This could be motivated by the typological rarity of having /ø/ but no /y/. New *i and *u did exist, but there was no new *ü.)

(The vowel sometimes call'd *ï in PU yields mostly *ɯɯ or *ɑɑ and is better understood as a mid vowel, *ë [ɤ ~ ʌ])

Isoglosses

This article is one of quite a few pages about Natlangs.

Indo-european natlangs:

Balto-Slavic Natlangs: Czech * Russian
Celtic Natlangs: Revived Middle Cornish * Pictish
Germanic Natlangs:
North Germanic Natlangs: Norwegian
West Germanic Natlangs: Anglo-Saxon * Dutch * English (Old English * Middle English * Modern English * Scots) * German (High German * Low German)
Indo-Iranian Natlangs: Pahlavi
Italic Natlangs: French * Italian * Latin * Spanish
Debated: Cimmerian

Uralic Natlangs: Finnish * Khanty * Mansi * Mordvinic * Proto-Uralic
Altaic (controversial): Japanese
Sino-Tibetan Natlangs:
Uto-Aztecan Natlangs: Nahuatl

-

Isolate Natlangs: Basque * *
Hypothetical/debated Natlangs and Natlang families: Danubian * Europic (obsolete)