Khanty: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
(→Vowels) |
||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
! !! Vax-Vasjugan !! Tremjugan-Jugan !! Demj-Konda !! Nizjam !! Kazym !! Obdorsk !! vs. [[Mansi]] !! Notes | ! !! Vax-Vasjugan !! Tremjugan-Jugan !! Demj-Konda !! Nizjam !! Kazym !! Obdorsk !! vs. [[Mansi]] !! Notes | ||
|- | |- | ||
| * | | *uu₁ || uu || uu || yy, uuˠ || u || u || uu || *uu ([oo]?) | ||
|- | |- | ||
| *ɯɯ || ɯɯ || ɯɯ || ii, eeˠ ||rowspan="3"| i ||rowspan="3"| i ||rowspan="3"| ii || *ɯɯ ([ɤɤ]?), *a | | *ɯɯ || ɯɯ || ɯɯ || ii, eeˠ ||rowspan="3"| i ||rowspan="3"| i ||rowspan="3"| ii || *ɯɯ ([ɤɤ]?), *a | ||
|- | |- | ||
| * | | *ii₁ || ii || ii ||rowspan="2"| ii || *ii ([ee]?) | ||
|- | |- | ||
| *yy || yy || iiʷ | | *yy || yy || iiʷ | ||
| Mainly from ii₁ / _ɣ (*čüüɣ *süüɣəs *lüüɣət *tüüɣət *süüɣ *müüɣ *püüɣəɬ), sometimes *k_ ( *küül- *küüĺ *küüli *küüm) | |||
|- | |- | ||
| * | | *oo || oo || o, a ||rowspan="3"| uu, ooˠ ||rowspan="3"| uu ||rowspan="3"| (w)oo ||rowspan="3"| oo || *aa, *a, *å | ||
| Živlov: *a | | Živlov: *a | ||
|- | |- | ||
| * | | *uu₂ || uu || uu || | ||
| Živlov: *oo | | Živlov: *oo | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 51: | Line 52: | ||
| *ɑɑ || ɑɑ || ɒɒ || oo, ɑɑˠ || ɔɔ || ɔɔ || ɑɑ || *ɯɯ, *ɑɑ | | *ɑɑ || ɑɑ || ɒɒ || oo, ɑɑˠ || ɔɔ || ɔɔ || ɑɑ || *ɯɯ, *ɑɑ | ||
|- | |- | ||
| * | | *ee || ee, øøˠ || aa ||rowspan="3"| ee ||rowspan="3"| ee ||rowspan="3"| ee ||rowspan="3"| ee || *ää, *ä | ||
| Živlov: *ä | | Živlov: *ä | ||
|- | |- | ||
| * | | *ii₂ || ii || ii || | ||
| Živlov: *ii; N&K (j)ee | | Živlov: *ii; N&K (j)ee | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 77: | Line 78: | ||
There is an interesting anomaly in the treatment of the Proto-Uralic close vowels: | There is an interesting anomaly in the treatment of the Proto-Uralic close vowels: | ||
* *i → *ee₁; *e before a cluster | * *i → *ee₁; *e before a cluster (barely any examples of the latter though) | ||
* *u → *oo₁; *o before a cluster | * *u → *oo₁; *o before a cluster | ||
* but: *ü → *ɵ uniformly (never **øø) | * but: *ü → *ɵ uniformly (never **øø) | ||
Line 83: | Line 84: | ||
* *i → *ä | * *i → *ä | ||
* *u → *å | * *u → *å | ||
* *ü → *ä, but | * *ü → *ä, but Southern Mansi ''ü'' | ||
In common Ob-Ugric these were apparently lower'd to *e *o *ö. In | In common Ob-Ugric these were apparently lower'd to *e *o *ö. In SMs it seems *ö then re-raised to ''ü'' (elsewhere merging to *e and continuing to *ä). (This could be motivated by the typological rarity of having /ø/ but no /y/. New *i and *u did exist, but there was no new *ü.) | ||
(The vowel | (The vowel sometimes call'd *ï in PU yields mostly *ɯɯ or *ɑɑ and is better understood as a mid vowel, *ë [ɤ ~ ʌ]) | ||
===Isoglosses=== | ===Isoglosses=== |
Revision as of 04:02, 10 February 2013
Spoken in Western Siberia, Khanty forms the eastern half of the Ob-Ugric languages. It has usually been treated as a single language divided in many dialects, tho a division into a small family of 3-4 languages may be more appropriate. The historical phonology of Khanty has been problematic in Uralistics.
Consonants
- s and *š develop into *ɬ unconditionally, while *ś depalatalizes to *s (common Ugric-Samoyedic developments).
- ɬ assimilates to *s if the word contains another *s as well (*sükśɜ → #ɬüɣs → *söɣəs "autumn", *sopśə → #ɬåps → *saapəs "net needle"; Ugr. #ɬås → *soˑs- "to dry"). (*ć has no effect in #saŋśɜ- → *ɬɯɯnć- "to stand"; #śosra → *ćorəs "1000" could be a later loan)
In all dialects but that of Tremjugan (where initial *ɬ → /j/), *ɬ then merges with *l (including that from *ð). The core dialects' reflex is /l/; a few retain /ɬ/; the marginal Vax and Obdorsk 'lects have /t/ (as do Mansi and Smy.) A *ɬʲ also emerges (which is treated the same, modulo palatalization).
As in Mansi, *w *k *x all become *ɣ in *i-stems. After *t, *č, this yields a geminate that later simplifies. When occurring after a coronal (*ɬɣ *rɣ), it is metathesized (again only in *i-stems).
- ðʲ becomes (as in Samoyedic) /j/, possibly thru an intermediate *ĺ (as in Mansi and Permic).
Retroflex *ɭ *ɳ sometimes appear for *l *n; the conditioning is not entirely clear but at least the presence of the pre-existing retroflex *č triggers this. Of note is that *ɭ does not fricate; rather, in the dialects where *l → ɬ/t, this becomes a new /l/.
Dialectal isoglosses tend to be shared with adjacent Mansi or Selkup dialects.
- West Khanty:
- *k → χ near back vowels (except… )
- *č → š (further → s in Obdorsk, as also in Sosva Mansi)
- *ć → s
- East Khanty
- *ć → tʲ
Vowels
Khanty dialects generally have a distinction between full and overshort vowels. This correlates with the long-short distinction of Mansi, and is transcribed here as geminate vs. single.
Many vowels develop different near to velar consonant, which is mark'd by <Vˠ>. Some dialects trigger labialization in following velars, markd by <Vʷ>.
Several paradigmatic vowel alternations (generally in height or length, such as *ɑɑ ~ *uu, or *e ~ *ee) occur in some varieties, that are generally thought to result from umlaut at a stage when there was a richer system of non-initial syllable vowels.
Vax-Vasjugan | Tremjugan-Jugan | Demj-Konda | Nizjam | Kazym | Obdorsk | vs. Mansi | Notes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
*uu₁ | uu | uu | yy, uuˠ | u | u | uu | *uu ([oo]?) | |
*ɯɯ | ɯɯ | ɯɯ | ii, eeˠ | i | i | ii | *ɯɯ ([ɤɤ]?), *a | |
*ii₁ | ii | ii | ii | *ii ([ee]?) | ||||
*yy | yy | iiʷ | Mainly from ii₁ / _ɣ (*čüüɣ *süüɣəs *lüüɣət *tüüɣət *süüɣ *müüɣ *püüɣəɬ), sometimes *k_ ( *küül- *küüĺ *küüli *küüm) | |||||
*oo | oo | o, a | uu, ooˠ | uu | (w)oo | oo | *aa, *a, *å | Živlov: *a |
*uu₂ | uu | uu | Živlov: *oo | |||||
*ɔɔ | ɔɔ | oo | ||||||
*ɑɑ | ɑɑ | ɒɒ | oo, ɑɑˠ | ɔɔ | ɔɔ | ɑɑ | *ɯɯ, *ɑɑ | |
*ee | ee, øøˠ | aa | ee | ee | ee | ee | *ää, *ä | Živlov: *ä |
*ii₂ | ii | ii | Živlov: *ii; N&K (j)ee | |||||
*øø | øø | aa, ø | Živlov: Split from *ee₁ | |||||
*ææ | ææ | aa | aa | ɑɑ | ɑɑ | aa | *ii | Sammallahti: TJ /ɒɒ/ ? (typo å for ȧ?) |
*ɶɶ | œœ | eeʷ | Živlov: Konda & O. /oo/ / _k | |||||
*o | o | o | ɑ | o | o | ɑ | *a, *å | |
*ɑ | ɑ | ɑ | Živlov: *ɯ (?!) | |||||
*e | e | e | e | ɑ | ɑ | a | *i | |
*ɵ | ø | ɵ, eʷ | ɵ | u | u | uu | *ü |
There is an interesting anomaly in the treatment of the Proto-Uralic close vowels:
- *i → *ee₁; *e before a cluster (barely any examples of the latter though)
- *u → *oo₁; *o before a cluster
- but: *ü → *ɵ uniformly (never **øø)
What seems to be going here starts unraveling once we compare the Mansi reflexes:
- *i → *ä
- *u → *å
- *ü → *ä, but Southern Mansi ü
In common Ob-Ugric these were apparently lower'd to *e *o *ö. In SMs it seems *ö then re-raised to ü (elsewhere merging to *e and continuing to *ä). (This could be motivated by the typological rarity of having /ø/ but no /y/. New *i and *u did exist, but there was no new *ü.)
(The vowel sometimes call'd *ï in PU yields mostly *ɯɯ or *ɑɑ and is better understood as a mid vowel, *ë [ɤ ~ ʌ])
Isoglosses
This article is one of quite a few pages about Natlangs. Indo-european natlangs:
Uralic Natlangs: Finnish * Khanty * Mansi * Mordvinic * Proto-Uralic
Isolate Natlangs: Basque * * |