File talk:Mogua1.png: Difference between revisions
(marked for deletion) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Why has this been marked for deletion? It is linked from on the [[Moj]] article. —[[User:Fenhl|Fenhl]] 02:08, 30 October 2012 (PDT) | Why has this been marked for deletion? It is linked from on the [[Moj]] article. —[[User:Fenhl|Fenhl]] 02:08, 30 October 2012 (PDT) | ||
I didn't mark it; the uploader has. I didn't remove the deletion tag because it was the originator's decision to mark it thus. If in your opinion the tag should be removed, I'll pull it. How do you propose we handle instances like this, where the uploader decides something should go, but the community wants it to stay? | |||
By uploading, does something become public property? "Please note that all contributions to FrathWiki are considered to be released under the Creative Commons "by-sa" license (see FrathWiki:Copyrights for details)." That seems to say that it does. | |||
"If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed '''at will''', then don't submit it here." And I suppose "at will" implies the public will. | |||
-[[User:Bornfor|bornfor]] 14:06, 30 October 2012 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 10:11, 30 October 2012
marked for deletion
Why has this been marked for deletion? It is linked from on the Moj article. —Fenhl 02:08, 30 October 2012 (PDT)
I didn't mark it; the uploader has. I didn't remove the deletion tag because it was the originator's decision to mark it thus. If in your opinion the tag should be removed, I'll pull it. How do you propose we handle instances like this, where the uploader decides something should go, but the community wants it to stay?
By uploading, does something become public property? "Please note that all contributions to FrathWiki are considered to be released under the Creative Commons "by-sa" license (see FrathWiki:Copyrights for details)." That seems to say that it does.
"If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then don't submit it here." And I suppose "at will" implies the public will.
-bornfor 14:06, 30 October 2012 (EDT)
