Talk:Philosophical language: Difference between revisions
From FrathWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Logomachist (talk | contribs) (Suggested the removal of Toki Pona from list of philosophical languages) |
(replied to Logomachist) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I believe that Toki Pona is mislabeled a philosophical language. Its "elevator pitch" links is with Daoism but there's not really a strong connection. If no one objects I'll remove it from the list of modern philosphical languages. --[[User:Logomachist|Logomachist]] 20:17, 13 January 2012 (PST) | I believe that Toki Pona is mislabeled a philosophical language. Its "elevator pitch" links is with Daoism but there's not really a strong connection. If no one objects I'll remove it from the list of modern philosphical languages. --[[User:Logomachist|Logomachist]] 20:17, 13 January 2012 (PST) | ||
:From the page: "A philosophical language is an engineered language which attempts to implement some kind of philosophical idea." | |||
:According to Wikipedia, TP it's inspired by taoist philosophy and tries to implement/test the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, so I think it counts. | |||
:'''Keep'''. —[[User:Fenhl|Fenhl]] 02:14, 14 January 2012 (PST) | |||
Revision as of 02:14, 14 January 2012
I believe that Toki Pona is mislabeled a philosophical language. Its "elevator pitch" links is with Daoism but there's not really a strong connection. If no one objects I'll remove it from the list of modern philosphical languages. --Logomachist 20:17, 13 January 2012 (PST)
- From the page: "A philosophical language is an engineered language which attempts to implement some kind of philosophical idea."
- According to Wikipedia, TP it's inspired by taoist philosophy and tries to implement/test the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, so I think it counts.
- Keep. —Fenhl 02:14, 14 January 2012 (PST)
