Talk:Conlang learners/Learners shortlist: Difference between revisions

From FrathWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(explaning)
 
(A "personal opinion" carries more weight if it has a name behind it IMO.)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Why Lojban, esperanto and others aren't on the list==
==Why Lojban, esperanto and others aren't on the list==
It is my personal opinion that the primary goal of this page is the promotion of candidat conlangs, these langauges that are so well known in the community need no fanfare, but if someone thinks that they really should be added, I suppose that there would be no wild objection
It is my personal opinion that the primary goal of this page is the promotion of candidat conlangs, these langauges that are so well known in the community need no fanfare, but if someone thinks that they really should be added, I suppose that there would be no wild objection
:<small>''The preceding unsigned comment was added by [[User:Ave matthew|Ave matthew]].''</small>

Revision as of 08:56, 8 July 2009

Why Lojban, esperanto and others aren't on the list

It is my personal opinion that the primary goal of this page is the promotion of candidat conlangs, these langauges that are so well known in the community need no fanfare, but if someone thinks that they really should be added, I suppose that there would be no wild objection

The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ave matthew.