FrathWiki talk:Logo: Difference between revisions

From FrathWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:


It's a Wiki about constructed languages.  Someone should make one that's like a construction site, building letters or words.....--[[User:Blackkdark|Blackkdark]] 19:22, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
It's a Wiki about constructed languages.  Someone should make one that's like a construction site, building letters or words.....--[[User:Blackkdark|Blackkdark]] 19:22, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
:Good idea. Why don't you have a go at creating one? Even if you're not good with graphics software, you could do a rough version to demonstrate your idea for other people to build on it.--[[User:Pisceesumsprecan|Pisceesumsprecan]] 20:04, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:04, 11 September 2008

In theory I like the pyramid better, but there are a few issues I can think of. Well, mostly the gold glo; the exposed part could use more wall thickness and/or shading (especially the exposed internal wall), as it currently looks a little too much like a parallelogram floating over the pyramid rather than a cavity. I get the WP connection, but I can't help thinking if a doorway would be easier to represent than a missing wall section. Ultimately some more detail inside might help too, I can't even tell if it's supposed to be a floor or a generic cavity.

As for the "large favicon" — no technical gripes, but I think it looks a bit too symbolic considering it doesn't seem to have any particular conlang connection.

Still, I think both have the eye beat. --John Vertical 18:14, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

I'll create a new version of my logo to implement some of these ideas. Whichever logo wins, do you think 'FrathWiki' looks better in a seif or sans-serif font? I prefer the latter. I think it's sleek and modern.--Pisceesumsprecan 19:09, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

It's a Wiki about constructed languages. Someone should make one that's like a construction site, building letters or words.....--Blackkdark 19:22, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Good idea. Why don't you have a go at creating one? Even if you're not good with graphics software, you could do a rough version to demonstrate your idea for other people to build on it.--Pisceesumsprecan 20:04, 11 September 2008 (UTC)