FrathWiki talk:Logo: Difference between revisions
(should we discuss this here, or?) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Still, I think both have the eye beat. --[[User:Tropylium|John Vertical]] 18:14, 11 September 2008 (UTC) | Still, I think both have the eye beat. --[[User:Tropylium|John Vertical]] 18:14, 11 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
:I'll create a new version of my logo to implement some of these ideas. Whichever logo wins, do you think 'FrathWiki' looks better in a seif or sans-serif font? I prefer the latter. I think it's sleek and modern.--[[User:Pisceesumsprecan|Pisceesumsprecan]] 19:09, 11 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 11:09, 11 September 2008
In theory I like the pyramid better, but there are a few issues I can think of. Well, mostly the gold glo; the exposed part could use more wall thickness and/or shading (especially the exposed internal wall), as it currently looks a little too much like a parallelogram floating over the pyramid rather than a cavity. I get the WP connection, but I can't help thinking if a doorway would be easier to represent than a missing wall section. Ultimately some more detail inside might help too, I can't even tell if it's supposed to be a floor or a generic cavity.
As for the "large favicon" — no technical gripes, but I think it looks a bit too symbolic considering it doesn't seem to have any particular conlang connection.
Still, I think both have the eye beat. --John Vertical 18:14, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
- I'll create a new version of my logo to implement some of these ideas. Whichever logo wins, do you think 'FrathWiki' looks better in a seif or sans-serif font? I prefer the latter. I think it's sleek and modern.--Pisceesumsprecan 19:09, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
