W: Difference between revisions

From FrathWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Redirecting to Labial-velar approximant)
 
(expanding)
Line 1: Line 1:
#REDIRECT [[Labial-velar approximant]]
One of the more recent additions to the canonical [[Latin alphabet]], the letter '''W''' arose as a digraph ''VV'' (but at a time preceding the estabilishment of ''[[U]]'' as separate from ''[[V]]'').
 
It is almost universally used to represent a [[labial-velar approximant]], but as always, [[ANADEW]]…
 
*One soundchange later, [[German]], [[Polish]], old [[Swedish]] etc. use it for /v/, the [[voiced labiodental fricative]].
**Or /ʋ/ (the [[labiodental approximant]]), depending on your analysis.
**The [[Voiced bilabila fricative|bilabial]] counterpart [β] also makes an appearence occasionally.
* Thanks to its vocalic origin, values such as [u] still occur in [[Welsh]].
* ''w'' also naturally lends itself to be used as a [[labialization]] diacritic.
*''Actually, this isn't really "except worse". Values such as /ə/ in [[Tyl Sjok]] are definitely farther off than anything I can think of here. Dang.''

Revision as of 14:31, 18 October 2009

One of the more recent additions to the canonical Latin alphabet, the letter W arose as a digraph VV (but at a time preceding the estabilishment of U as separate from V).

It is almost universally used to represent a labial-velar approximant, but as always, ANADEW

  • One soundchange later, German, Polish, old Swedish etc. use it for /v/, the voiced labiodental fricative.
  • Thanks to its vocalic origin, values such as [u] still occur in Welsh.
  • w also naturally lends itself to be used as a labialization diacritic.
  • Actually, this isn't really "except worse". Values such as /ə/ in Tyl Sjok are definitely farther off than anything I can think of here. Dang.