Seuna verbs: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
|} | |} | ||
There are also forms used when the | There are also forms used when the agent is unknown or unimportant. | ||
These forms are -'''oi'''- for the singular and -'''eu'''- for the plural. | |||
An obvious question is ... if they agent is unknown, then how do you decide which of the two forms to use. | |||
The answer is that if the action is typically performed by one person you use the '''oi''' form. | |||
Whereas if the action is typically performed by more than one person, you use the '''eu''' form. | |||
'''bundeurin dwolo''' = they say a house was built | |||
'''caito kludoirus''' = (I guess) the book will be written | |||
skriver = 'writing happens' (on écrit) [IMPERSONAL] | skriver = 'writing happens' (on écrit) [IMPERSONAL] | ||
The equivalent of the English passive is expressed by using the | The equivalent of the English passive is expressed by using the | ||
impersonal _with a direct object_, e.g. skriver ul levr = on écrit un | impersonal _with a direct object_, e.g. skriver ul levr = on écrit un | ||
livre = a book is being written | livre = a book is being written | ||
These forms roughly correspond to indefinite pronouns such as | |||
Swedish and German ''man'', French ''on'' and English ''one'' | |||
a house is built = someone built a house | a house is built = someone built a house | ||
==Mood suffix== | ==Mood suffix== | ||
Line 61: | Line 70: | ||
{| border=1 | {| border=1 | ||
|align=center| to hit | |align=center| to hit | ||
|align=center| | |align=center| '''timpa''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
|align=center| Hit him/her. | |align=center| Hit him/her. | ||
|align=center| | |align=center| '''timpiya na''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
|align=center| Hit him/her(spoken to more than one person). | |align=center| Hit him/her(spoken to more than one person). | ||
|align=center| -'''timpeya na''' | |align=center| -'''timpeya na''' | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 74: | Line 83: | ||
{| border=1 | {| border=1 | ||
|align=center| Don't hit him/her. | |align=center| Don't hit him/her. | ||
|align=center| | |align=center| '''kya timpa na''' | ||
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 15:28, 12 April 2008
In finite form, the verb has always three slots after the main word. These slots are for subject, mood and tense. A fourth slot, which gives evidential information is also often tagged on.
Subject suffix
The subject slot is filled as follows ;-
I | -a- | we(exc.) | -au- |
we(inc.) | -ai- | ||
you | -i- | you(pl.) | -e- |
he/she | -o- | they | -u- |
There are also forms used when the agent is unknown or unimportant. These forms are -oi- for the singular and -eu- for the plural. An obvious question is ... if they agent is unknown, then how do you decide which of the two forms to use.
The answer is that if the action is typically performed by one person you use the oi form.
Whereas if the action is typically performed by more than one person, you use the eu form.
bundeurin dwolo = they say a house was built
caito kludoirus = (I guess) the book will be written
skriver = 'writing happens' (on écrit) [IMPERSONAL] The equivalent of the English passive is expressed by using the impersonal _with a direct object_, e.g. skriver ul levr = on écrit un livre = a book is being written These forms roughly correspond to indefinite pronouns such as Swedish and German man, French on and English one a house is built = someone built a house
Mood suffix
The mood slot is filled as follows ;-
indicative | -r- | negative indicative | -rt- |
subjunctive | -s- | negative subjuctive | -st- |
imperitive | -ya |
When the imperative is used there is no tense suffix. Also it is used only with the two second person subject suffixes. So for example;-
to hit | timpa |
Hit him/her. | timpiya na |
Hit him/her(spoken to more than one person). | -timpeya na |
To negate the imperative we use the particle kya. For example ;-
Don't hit him/her. | kya timpa na |
Notice that in the negative form, the single/plural distinction is lost.
Tense suffix
The tense slot is filled as follows ;-
past | -i |
future | -u |
perfect | -a |
past perfect | -ua |
future perfect | -ia |
general/habitual | -o |
present | -e |
simultaneous | -ai |
consequential | -au |
Evidential suffix
reported | -n |
inferred | -s |
seen | -o |
Evidentials are only used in main(independent clauses), with the indicative mood. The "seen" evidential is only used with the past tense suffix. None of the evidentials are obligatory. The reported and inferred seem to bring into doubt the reliability of the information somewhat.
-n means inferred from evidence and is used in the situations in which we prefix or tag on "I guess" or "I think" to a clause in English.
-s means and information asserted is got from some third party and is used where we might prefix "they say" to a clause in English.
Negation
The way to negate an infinitive, is to put the particle ka in front of the verb.
ka solbe = to not drink ka timpa = to not hit
Now usually as already seen, verbs in the indicative and subjunctive are negated by the infix t. However ka can also be used in these cases as well. When this happens it adds emphasis to the negation. For example ;-
ka solborti = He/she definitely didn't drink.
The copula
The forms of the copula are almost identical to the TAM markings. Only the 3sng form is different, its vowel being dropped.
I was | ari | we(exc.)were | auri |
we(inc.) were | airi | ||
you were | iri | you(lot) were | eri |
he/she was | ri | they are | uri |
You will notice that in the above table we demonstrated the copula system using the past tense. The reason that the past tense was used is that the present tense in English corresponds to two forms and two meanings in Seuna. The difference in meaning between the two forms, is the same as the difference between the two Spanish copulas “estar” and "ser". The "e" form being used for a less permanent state of affairs (similar to the use of "estar")and the "o" form being used for a more permanent state of affairs (similar to the use of "ser").
are buke = I am sick aro buke = I am an invalid
To negate the 3sng copula, you must always use the particle ka.
ka re buke = He is not sick
Mostly for equating nouns, they are just placed together with no copula.
mi "doctor" = I am a doctor
Of course a copula must be used if any tense information has to be given.
aru "doctor" = I will be a doctor
To relate an adjective to a noun, the copula must be used. For example;-
uro jutu = They are big
However adjectives are often presented as nouns in this situation. For example;-
wa jutula = They're big'uns
Nouns from verbs
solbe | to drink | humpa | to eat |
solbela | the drinker | humpala | the eater |
solbo | beverage | humpo | food |
If it was some device doing the action then the suffix would be ma instead of la.
The single syllable verbs
Usually a verb is recognizable by its midword consonant cluster. These verbs are of course multi-syllable. However the most common verbs are single-syllable. They are given below.
to leave | yi |
to arrive | wu |
to give | loi |
to be | bia |
to have | kua |
to get/obtain | kwa |
to become | bwa |
to loose | kya |
to stop being | bya |
to go | go |
to come | me |
to know | sai |
to realize/notice | swai |
to return | gwia |
to tell | slai |
to send | glo |
to rise | teu |
to go down | joi |
to raise | twe |
to lower | jwo |
to enter | pai |
to exit | fau |
to insert | pli |
to extract | flu |
to go through | mya |
to see | bai |
to show | bla |
to say | plo |
to think | kle |
to want | nyo |
to wish | fyu |
to take | oi |
to put | heu |
to understand | nai |
to follow | dwe |
to cross | cwo |
Index
- Introduction to Seuna
- Seuna : Chapter 1
- Seuna word shape
- The script of Seuna
- Seuna sentence structure
- Seuna pronouns
- Seuna nouns
- Seuna verbs (1)
- Seuna adjectives
- Seuna demonstratives
- Seuna verbs (2)
- Asking a question in Seuna
- Seuna relative clauses
- Seuna verbs (3)
- Methods for deriving words in Seuna
- List of all Seuna derivational affixes
- Numbers in Seuna
- Naming people in Seuna
- The Seuna calendar
- Seuna units