Hemackle: Difference between revisions
Fordsmender (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Fordsmender (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<center><font size=+1>The CONSONANTS</font> | <center><font size="+1">The CONSONANTS</font> | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
[[#B|B]] - [[#C|C]] - [[#CH|CH]] - [[#D|D]] - [[#F|F]] - [[#G|G]] - [[#GH|GH]] - [[#H|H]] - [[#K|K]] - [[#L|L]] - [[#M|M]] - [[#N|N]] - [[#P|P]] - [[#Q|Q]] - [[#R|R]] - [[#S|S]] - [[#T|T]] - [[#W|W]] - [[#X|X]] - [[#Y|Y]] - [[#Z|Z]] | [[#B|B]] - [[#C|C]] - [[#CH|CH]] - [[#D|D]] - [[#F|F]] - [[#G|G]] - [[#GH|GH]] - [[#H|H]] - [[#K|K]] - [[#L|L]] - [[#M|M]] - [[#N|N]] - [[#P|P]] - [[#Q|Q]] - [[#R|R]] - [[#S|S]] - [[#T|T]] - [[#W|W]] - [[#X|X]] - [[#Y|Y]] - [[#Z|Z]] | ||
</center> | </center> |
Revision as of 12:36, 4 August 2007
Hemackle Ghmachle | |
Spoken in: | (country) |
Total speakers: | (number of speakers) |
Genealogical classification: | (Indo-European)
|
Basic word order: | SVO (V2) |
Morphological type: | inflecting |
Morphosyntactic alignment: | Accusative |
Created by: | |
Zeke Fordsmender | 2003 to present |
Consonants | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bilabial | Labiod. | Dental | Alveolar | Post-alv. | Palatal | Velar | Uvular | Glottal | ||||||||||
Nasal | m | n | ŋ | |||||||||||||||
Plosive | pʰ | b | tʰ | d | kʰ | |||||||||||||
Fricative | fʰ | v | sʰ | z | ʃʰ | xʰ | ɣ | χʰ | h | |||||||||
Affricate | ʧʰ | ʤ | ||||||||||||||||
Approximants | ɹʷ | j | ɰʷ | |||||||||||||||
Trill | ʀ | |||||||||||||||||
Lateral Approximant | l |
B - C - CH - D - F - G - GH - H - K - L - M - N - P - Q - R - S - T - W - X - Y - Z
B
<b> is [b].
G
<g> has no set pronunciation, but instead is used to denote a number of glides.
R
<r> is pronounced [ʀ] when alone and in syllable-initial clusters. It is pronounced [χʰ] before [pʰ] and [kʰ], and is silent before [sʰ], [tʰ], [d], [n], and [l], and after [ɛː]. In most dialects it is silent word-finally, though a few now render it [ɹʷ].
There is no agreement in the literature regarding the precise articulation of /w/ and /gh/ (when realized as an approximant). The dispute lies in whether or not the sound may be considered a labialized velar approximant, or a true labiovelar one. Although the complex historical relationship between Proto-Germanic *ɡ and <w> seems to imply a labialized velar approximant, in the present language both [ɰʷ] ( [w] ) and [ɰ͡β̞] may be heard in dialect, and so to avoid confusion the authors have chosen to use the graph <ɰʷ> in describing this sound.