Talk:Oligosynthesis Project: Difference between revisions
From FrathWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
WeepingElf (talk | contribs) (New page: Someone suggested this could be a League of Lost Languages language, but that won't do. The LLL is for naturalistic conlangs only. ''There are no oligosynthetic natlangs'', so there ...) |
(Not enough redundancy.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Someone suggested this could be a [[League of Lost Languages]] language, but that won't do. The LLL is for naturalistic conlangs only. ''There are no oligosynthetic natlangs'', so there won't be an oligosynthetic lostlang. | Someone suggested this could be a [[League of Lost Languages]] language, but that won't do. The LLL is for naturalistic conlangs only. ''There are no oligosynthetic natlangs'', so there won't be an oligosynthetic lostlang. | ||
--[[User:WeepingElf|WeepingElf]] 10:20, 24 June 2007 (PDT) | --[[User:WeepingElf|WeepingElf]] 10:20, 24 June 2007 (PDT) | ||
== Not enough redundancy. == | |||
I've taken a look at the roots. They look like generated by a filtered script or something. | |||
This would generate a lot of confusion if the language ever gets used. Specifically, my biggest pet peeves are roots that contrast w and W but otherwise sound the same (e.g. paw and paW). Such distinction would get lost in the noise rather quickly. | |||
Also, be careful with how it would end after roots get conjugation/declension/affixes. | |||
Revision as of 13:38, 23 July 2007
Someone suggested this could be a League of Lost Languages language, but that won't do. The LLL is for naturalistic conlangs only. There are no oligosynthetic natlangs, so there won't be an oligosynthetic lostlang. --WeepingElf 10:20, 24 June 2007 (PDT)
Not enough redundancy.
I've taken a look at the roots. They look like generated by a filtered script or something.
This would generate a lot of confusion if the language ever gets used. Specifically, my biggest pet peeves are roots that contrast w and W but otherwise sound the same (e.g. paw and paW). Such distinction would get lost in the noise rather quickly.
Also, be careful with how it would end after roots get conjugation/declension/affixes.
