User talk:Soap: Difference between revisions
From FrathWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
|||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
*punishment for atlaman raspara of 100 diet if commiting a major crime | *punishment for atlaman raspara of 100 diet if commiting a major crime | ||
*The likely cognate of Poswa '''pib''' "to pick fruit; sample, example, specimen" in Khulls is '''pʷ''' and in proto-Moonshine '''p'''. | |||
===Unbalanced gender setups=== | ===Unbalanced gender setups=== |
Revision as of 20:16, 6 February 2020
Things to do
- check deeted page of this
- punishment for atlaman raspara of 100 diet if commiting a major crime
- The likely cognate of Poswa pib "to pick fruit; sample, example, specimen" in Khulls is pʷ and in proto-Moonshine p.
Unbalanced gender setups
- 1 man + 999 women = 1000 men (IE)
- pregnant women addressed with male pronouns if baby is known to be a boy.
- Genders take different positions on an animacy hierarchy. (Many Languages of Teppala if babies are considered a separate gender)
- nom-acc for males, erg-abs for females (some conlangs; proposed for pre-PIE plural feminine)
- Accusative case of males is the same as the nominative case of females, though this is a superficial resemblance only; they behave as normal nominatives and accusatives. (Late Andanese)
- Males cannot be the agent of certain verbs without a morpheme showing which woman gave them persmission to do so; or the opposite. (Resembles Poswa and Pabappa 's treatment of sentient animals)
- Genders behave differently with respect to some other grammatical function. (Many Languages of Teppala)
- Many semantically inanimate objects (umbrella, purse, dishes) are assigned to either the masculine or feminine gender, with a great imbalance in who gets what; men and women need extra morphemes to possess objects not of the "proper" gender, even if these are very common. (Moonshine)
- certain verbs automatically take on a more violent of forceful meaning if subject is male, unless an extra morpheme is added. (Late Andanese)
- Deities are always grammatically masculine, even if female in form (claimed for Tamil, apparently false)
- male gender associated with broken objects or unpleasant things. (Jmo; some English feminists sarcastic use of male- as a variant form of mal-)
- masculine has to be indicated with a suffix; unmarked form is usually feminine (Láadan; with is defined both as "woman" and "human", rather like the inverse of English man)
- Feminine has to be indicated with a suffix; unmarked form is usually masculine unless the descriptor is syntactically associated with females , as with nursing, menial labor, etc (IE)
Subumpam
Hey.
I came upon your page Subumpam using the "Random page" feature, and I think "Subnumpamese" is supposed to be "Subumpamese". Khemehekis (talk) 13:06, 25 January 2020 (PST)
- Thanks, but thats just one of hundreds if not thousands of typos .... I really dont have the time to keep all these pages going, let alone fix all the typos ... I've lately been focused on writing up pages on my website, anyway ... some of which are also here, and some of which are not. But thank you, I appreciate the attention. Soap (talk) 17:46, 6 February 2020 (PST)