Talk:Khemehekis Conlanger Taxonomy: Difference between revisions
From FrathWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Khemehekis (talk | contribs) (YW) |
WeepingElf (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Thanks for adding this! I think it's a very useful alternative to the venerable GnT. [[User:Elemtilas|Elemtilas]] ([[User talk:Elemtilas|talk]]) 17:56, 23 September 2019 (PDT) | Thanks for adding this! I think it's a very useful alternative to the venerable GnT. [[User:Elemtilas|Elemtilas]] ([[User talk:Elemtilas|talk]]) 17:56, 23 September 2019 (PDT) | ||
:You're welcome! Feel free to discuss it on the places where you're ''not'' banned. And I wish to thank ''you'' for finding good categories for it! [[User:Khemehekis|Khemehekis]] ([[User talk:Khemehekis|talk]]) 18:18, 23 September 2019 (PDT) | :You're welcome! Feel free to discuss it on the places where you're ''not'' banned. And I wish to thank ''you'' for finding good categories for it! [[User:Khemehekis|Khemehekis]] ([[User talk:Khemehekis|talk]]) 18:18, 23 September 2019 (PDT) | ||
Nice stuff! However, I feel that it focuses too much on people making fictional languages. Not all conlangs are set in a conworld; most engelangs aren't, nor are (usually) auxlangs. It would be better to replace "conworld" with some broader term such as "project", or whatever to call a set of conlangs that somehow belong together (a ''suite'' of conlangs, perhaps?). --[[User:WeepingElf|WeepingElf]] ([[User talk:WeepingElf|talk]]) 07:23, 26 September 2019 (PDT) | |||
Revision as of 06:23, 26 September 2019
Thanks for adding this! I think it's a very useful alternative to the venerable GnT. Elemtilas (talk) 17:56, 23 September 2019 (PDT)
- You're welcome! Feel free to discuss it on the places where you're not banned. And I wish to thank you for finding good categories for it! Khemehekis (talk) 18:18, 23 September 2019 (PDT)
Nice stuff! However, I feel that it focuses too much on people making fictional languages. Not all conlangs are set in a conworld; most engelangs aren't, nor are (usually) auxlangs. It would be better to replace "conworld" with some broader term such as "project", or whatever to call a set of conlangs that somehow belong together (a suite of conlangs, perhaps?). --WeepingElf (talk) 07:23, 26 September 2019 (PDT)
