Mordvinic: Difference between revisions
(→Development from Proto-Uralic: improve…) |
(→Development to the individual languages: finetuning) |
||
Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
==Development to the individual languages== | ==Development to the individual languages== | ||
Vowels: | '''Vowels''': | ||
* Erzya: | * Erzya: | ||
** *ä > e | ** *ä > e | ||
** Dialectally, *e > ä (yet *ä always > e!) | ** Dialectally, *e > ä (yet *ä always > e!) | ||
** *a > o / _j. (''ojdor<!-- < *aja-?! --> ojmams ojme voj kojme'' | ** *a > o / _j. (''ojdor<!-- < *aja-?! --> ojmams ojme voj kojme''; perhaps ''ľom'' ~ Mk ''lajmä''; ''bojar nojabŕa vojna'' ~ Mk ''bajar najabŕä vajna'' (< Ru боярин ноябрь война); but ''ajge- g/kajge- tajmaza'', ''g/kajťan-'' < Ru гайтан.) | ||
** in later syllables e ə > e | ** in later syllables e ə > Će/Co (i.e. not strictly "vowel harmony"); some exceptions (''piźol'') | ||
** in Tambov Oblast (Kad. Kal. Kažl. Šir.), *u > *vi / _Ć (''viľ- viŕaš viŕna- viśkä viźiŕ'') | ** in Tambov Oblast (Kad. Kal. Kažl. Šir.), *u > *vi / _Ć (''viľ- viŕaš viŕna- viśkä viźiŕ'') | ||
**: — does this indicate *u > *ü > *vi, and similar late retention PU *ü > *ö > *ve?! | **: — does this indicate *u > *ü > *vi, and similar late retention PU *ü > *ö > *ve?! | ||
* Mokša: | * Mokša: | ||
** *ə > ä/a / _# per harmony; ä also after palatals, a after nonpalatal *s/*z (or other alveolars) | ** *ə is split as allophonic [ə̟] ~ [ə̠], similar to Erzya | ||
** *əj *əw > i u | *** /ə/ → [ə̠] also between a (phonemic) nonpalatal and a palatal (at least ''ćipəŕ kavəŕ kopəŕ mokəŕ odgəŕ šäxəŕ tokəŕ'', cases with other /Cʲ/ TBA) — but contrast ''kevəŕ'' with [ə̟]? | ||
**** later than *ŋ > j/v: ''šej''[ə̠]''ŕ'' < *šeŋəŕ | |||
** *ə > ä/a / _# per harmony; ä also after palatals, a after nonpalatal *s/*z (or other alveolars) — i.e. [ə̠] > a, [ə̟] > ä | |||
** *əj *əw (from *əɣ *əŋ) > i u | |||
** *i *u > ə / initial pretonic | ** *i *u > ə / initial pretonic | ||
A possible final *-ə/-ä contrast does not seem reconstructible (will write *-ɜ), but should medially remain in Mk. (''śäjäŕ'') | ** in P Pš, *e > ä / {v k}_ŕ (''käŕ käŕ- käŕč käŕämäť väŕ väŕəďə-'') - maybe generalizable as peripheral + ''ŕ'', no counterexamples with ''m- p-'' | ||
A possible final *-ə/-ä contrast does not seem reconstructible (will write *-ɜ), but should medially remain in Mk. (only inherited example: ''śäjäŕ''). | |||
Consonants: | '''Consonants''': | ||
* Erzya: | * Erzya: | ||
** *š > č / #_ (dialectal) | ** *š > č / #_ (dialectal) | ||
Line 76: | Line 80: | ||
** *nd > n / 3rd+ syllable | ** *nd > n / 3rd+ syllable | ||
* Mokša: | * Mokša: | ||
** *č > š / #_ | ** ? *č > š / #_ (if not already in Proto-Mordv.) | ||
*** initial ''č-'' occurs in recent loans (''čavka'' ← Tat.), onomatopoeia / ideophones (''čaka-'', ''čoka-'' 'to hit', ''čof'' 'whistle', ''čofaďə-'' 'to push/swat away', ''čura-'' 'to piss', ''čəka'' 'game pin'), ? (''čińas čiva čivgä čopaftə-''; ''ču/əŕkä'' < ? *čŕka) | |||
** *k > ∅ / F_š (''jäšä käšə- ľeš meš päšä ťišä äšťəŕ'' - but: ''šäkši''), also sometimes #_šC (before nonpalatals? ''šna šta'', but ''kšńi kšńit'') | ** *k > ∅ / F_š (''jäšä käšə- ľeš meš päšä ťišä äšťəŕ'' - but: ''šäkši''), also sometimes #_šC (before nonpalatals? ''šna šta'', but ''kšńi kšńit'') | ||
** Devoicing: m n r l j v > p t r̥ l̥ ç f / _{p t c č k}. Dialectally ç > ɕ. | ** Devoicing: m n r l j v > p t r̥ l̥ ç f / _{p t c č k}. Dialectally ç > ɕ. | ||
** *s > ś / _F | ** *s > ś / _F | ||
** n > ń / #_Vŕ (''ńuŕa- ńuŕgə- ńuŕgamə-'') (check other palatals?) | ** n > ń / #_Vŕ (''ńuŕa- ńuŕgə- ńuŕgamə-'') (check other palatals?) | ||
* *ŋ > j/v per | * *ŋ > j/v per vowel backness, except dialectally in Erzya | ||
A development *pt > *ft > Erzya vt (sim. for *kt) may make better sense than a common voiced stage. (Coda /v/ is generally realized as [w].) | A development *pt > *ft > Erzya vt (sim. for *kt) may make better sense than a common voiced stage. (Coda /v/ is generally realized as [w].) | ||
Revision as of 08:12, 5 March 2018
Some reconstruction notes.
Development from Proto-Uralic
Changes shared with Samic in gray, those also shared with Finnic in green, and those with even wider distribution in orange.
- *V > *Vː / _x (both preconsonantal and prevocalic!)
- *a > *o / _C*ə (except _Ć, _x)
- *ë > *a
- *ü > *i, by default
- initially *wi- (*ük- > *vej-, *(w)ülä- > *veľ-; any others??)
- *ü > *u / _velar (*mok- *pokəń *poŋə *śokś); counterfed by the previous. NB also *miŋä > *meŋ- > mej-!
- Vowel height switch:
- *i *u > *ɪ *ʊ
- *Vː > *V
- *e *o > *i *u (assuming a long stage not required)
- *ɪ *ʊ > *e *o
- *o remains before *ŋ however (*čov *joŋs *lokśəj *oŋ poŋgo/pov *sova-, possibly *poŋa ~ Es põv, or poŋgo/povə ~ Es pooma (depending on if *uŋa > BF *oo))
- Possibly including: *ɪː *ʊː > *iː *uː > *i *u (*wêxə- > *vij-)
- Last two stages probably postdate vowel reduction (given loanwords like *kerda > *kirda)
- Stress shifts from *e / *o to a later-syllable *ä / *a
- *mt > *nt
- *ć > *ś (if PU *ć even existed; /ć/ is found in Mk oćä, seems to be secondary; lenition may be later than voicing: *eś ~ itse, *śiśəm ~ seitsen, )
- Medial lenition, round 1 (all this when intervocalic or prenasal)
- *pp *tt *čč *kk > *p *t *č *k (clear examples exist only for *pp though!)
- *p *t *k > *b *d *g
- *s *š *ś *x > *z *ž *ź *j
- *č, however, remains strictly unvoiced
- *nź > ź? (Er. saźi- ~ P. *suudź-)
- *rs *šn > š (*kürsä *warsa *wešnä > *kši *vašə *višɜ)
- or *ər > š? (Ir. *kārt → *kšńi, but cf. Av. *rt > <š>)
- Word-final *ə > ∅ after a single consonant, or peripheral + sibilant (*joŋs *käťks *lafś *mekš *piks *soks *sokś *suks, ? *vaks)
- after this, unstress'd *ä *a > *ə too
- secondarily *ə > ∅ / al_ (al kal pal sal val); -a still attested in 17th century
- possibly also *ə > ∅ / {j w ŋ}_ ? (*čoŋ *toŋ *vej)
- unclear: *marja > *maŕ, *ora(wa) > *ur
- *d₂ > *ľ / #_, _C (only ľom~lajmä, *śulgə)
- Palatalization redistribution
- *t *d *n *l *r (but not *s/*z!) > *ť *ď *ń *ŕ *ľ before/after front vowels or *j
- *ń > *n initially before back vowels (the *n/*ń contrast is completely lost initially)
- if *soďka > *suľgə, then also here further *ľ > *l
- Palatalization occurs also in all back-vocalic originally *ə-stem verbs (*koľgə- *moľə- *poŕə- *sańďə- *uľə-, possibly *pańə- if ~ F. *pane- rather than *paina-), perhaps analogy from the preterite stem? (*kolgə-j- > *kolgi- > *koľgi- etc.)
- Counterfed by *a-ə > *o-a: cf. *kalə- > *kola- > *kulə-. (But, regardless, *uľə-? Cf F *olë-)
- Also *-x- > *-j- may fall under this (however: *lukə- > *lovə-)
- Also non-alveolar consonants are palatalized before front vowels, but this remains allophonic.
- *j *w > ∅ / C_, *w > *v elsewhere
- This probably phonemicizes *ŕ (*maŕ *uŕə); in theory also *ľ, but no good examples exist.
- Obstruent + *w remains voiceless (*kaswa- > *kasə-, *latwa > *latə, *wiśwɜ > *veśə)
- Possibly also: *j > ∅ / F_# (i.e. nominals only: *ki *pi *si(j) *ve). Counterfed by *ŋ > j, possibly also *k > *g > *j? (*vi(j))
- No good evidence exists on retention of *-w / B_#; only *pov ~ alleged Est. dial. põv, source??
- Medial lenition, round 2 (intervocalic)
- *b > *v; also r_V (*karvə *ku/orva- *tərva *u/eŕva)
- *g > *v/*j (per vowel backness); possibly late, since *ŋ > v ~ j by similar conditioning in most dialects is post-PMo.
- But: *d₁, *d₂ > *d/*ď
- This and the last may indicate that common Mordvinic still had */ð ɣ/ (similar to older Mari) and /d g/ is recent Russian influence (similar to westernmost Finnish, Votic, newer Mari, possibly Veps).
- *kt *pt > *ft; *ps *pś > fs fś (*lafś *lofsa)
- *k > *t / C_# (in the imperativ)
[…TBC…]
Development to the individual languages
Vowels:
- Erzya:
- *ä > e
- Dialectally, *e > ä (yet *ä always > e!)
- *a > o / _j. (ojdor ojmams ojme voj kojme; perhaps ľom ~ Mk lajmä; bojar nojabŕa vojna ~ Mk bajar najabŕä vajna (< Ru боярин ноябрь война); but ajge- g/kajge- tajmaza, g/kajťan- < Ru гайтан.)
- in later syllables e ə > Će/Co (i.e. not strictly "vowel harmony"); some exceptions (piźol)
- in Tambov Oblast (Kad. Kal. Kažl. Šir.), *u > *vi / _Ć (viľ- viŕaš viŕna- viśkä viźiŕ)
- — does this indicate *u > *ü > *vi, and similar late retention PU *ü > *ö > *ve?!
- Mokša:
- *ə is split as allophonic [ə̟] ~ [ə̠], similar to Erzya
- /ə/ → [ə̠] also between a (phonemic) nonpalatal and a palatal (at least ćipəŕ kavəŕ kopəŕ mokəŕ odgəŕ šäxəŕ tokəŕ, cases with other /Cʲ/ TBA) — but contrast kevəŕ with [ə̟]?
- later than *ŋ > j/v: šej[ə̠]ŕ < *šeŋəŕ
- /ə/ → [ə̠] also between a (phonemic) nonpalatal and a palatal (at least ćipəŕ kavəŕ kopəŕ mokəŕ odgəŕ šäxəŕ tokəŕ, cases with other /Cʲ/ TBA) — but contrast kevəŕ with [ə̟]?
- *ə > ä/a / _# per harmony; ä also after palatals, a after nonpalatal *s/*z (or other alveolars) — i.e. [ə̠] > a, [ə̟] > ä
- *əj *əw (from *əɣ *əŋ) > i u
- *i *u > ə / initial pretonic
- in P Pš, *e > ä / {v k}_ŕ (käŕ käŕ- käŕč käŕämäť väŕ väŕəďə-) - maybe generalizable as peripheral + ŕ, no counterexamples with m- p-
- *ə is split as allophonic [ə̟] ~ [ə̠], similar to Erzya
A possible final *-ə/-ä contrast does not seem reconstructible (will write *-ɜ), but should medially remain in Mk. (only inherited example: śäjäŕ).
Consonants:
- Erzya:
- *š > č / #_ (dialectal)
- *j > ∅ / _e (fed by *ä-raising; *je- previously didn't exist)
- *nd > n / 3rd+ syllable
- Mokša:
- ? *č > š / #_ (if not already in Proto-Mordv.)
- initial č- occurs in recent loans (čavka ← Tat.), onomatopoeia / ideophones (čaka-, čoka- 'to hit', čof 'whistle', čofaďə- 'to push/swat away', čura- 'to piss', čəka 'game pin'), ? (čińas čiva čivgä čopaftə-; ču/əŕkä < ? *čŕka)
- *k > ∅ / F_š (jäšä käšə- ľeš meš päšä ťišä äšťəŕ - but: šäkši), also sometimes #_šC (before nonpalatals? šna šta, but kšńi kšńit)
- Devoicing: m n r l j v > p t r̥ l̥ ç f / _{p t c č k}. Dialectally ç > ɕ.
- *s > ś / _F
- n > ń / #_Vŕ (ńuŕa- ńuŕgə- ńuŕgamə-) (check other palatals?)
- ? *č > š / #_ (if not already in Proto-Mordv.)
- *ŋ > j/v per vowel backness, except dialectally in Erzya
A development *pt > *ft > Erzya vt (sim. for *kt) may make better sense than a common voiced stage. (Coda /v/ is generally realized as [w].)
On the correspondence PU *m > /v/
After PU *u
- *lumə "sno" > *loŋ (!)
- *kumV "cloud" > *kovol
Suffix exchange?
- *śüðäm(ə) "heart" > *śeďeŋ
Versus BF *-u
- *śëmə(-w?) > *śëëmu > *śav (cf. BF *soomu)
- *suv "fog" ~ BF *sumu ~ S. *somō
- *ľevəš "lime bast" ~ BF *lehmus ~ Ma. *nəməštə
Limited comparanda
- Er. jav "joint" ~ BF *jama ~ S *jōmē (or better ~ javoms < *jëka-)
- *šov "butt of knife" ~ BF *hamara ~ S *ši/ëmērē ← Gmc *hamaraz
- *šovar "mortar" ~ BF *huumar ~ Ma. *šuer
- *toŋ (!) "kernel" ~ F. tuma ~ tuuma ~ E. tuum ~ Me. tum ~ Hi. toŋ
- *kav "granary, barn" ~ K. kum "loft"
(*luv "gap" = Ma. *lu better ~ F *lovi than *loma)
But not in:
Er. kumoka "fever" ~ BF *kuuma "hot"- *lamə "many" ~ BF *laama
- *šamə "shape" ~ BF *haamo
- *kuma > *koma, *juma- > *jumi-, *tammə > *tumə
- *numələ *śumərdə- umaŕ *komər Er. umok
- *ľem *kämə
- #ľajmə *ľäm *śimə-
Also *p ~ Mari *m
- *karvə "fly" ~ BF *kärpä-, Ma. #ka/arme
cf. Hungarian:
- kumi > hava-, hó
*kt notes
Ravila '33:
- Mk ĺiç/ɕťə- (Selišče, Pšenevo) ~ ĺifťə- "hervornehmen/-ziehen/-quellen/-sprudeln" (kausatiivi?)
- Mk ĺiçťəma (Gorodišče) "lähde"
- Mk śeɕťə- (Pš.) ~ Er. sevťnə- "sormeilla"
- Mk ťiçťəďə- (Čembar) ~ ťifťəďə- (Sel.) "ochutitjsja"
- ńäfťə- "näyttää", vifťə- "johdattaa" (*vêx-ta-), ĺifťə- "paeta" ← ĺijə- "lentää" (eikä ← *läkti-?)
This article is one of quite a few pages about Natlangs. Indo-european natlangs:
Uralic Natlangs: Finnish * Khanty * Mansi * Mordvinic * Proto-Uralic
Isolate Natlangs: Basque * * |