Khangaþyagon Subordinate Clauses: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Subordinate clauses, | ==Subordinate clauses, complement clauses and action nominals== | ||
===Subordinate Clauses=== | ===Subordinate Clauses=== | ||
====Relative Clauses==== | |||
These are introduced by the conjunction ū "such that". For example, | These are introduced by the conjunction ū "such that". For example, | ||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
|snægr-||i||hol-||wo||mall-||ap-||ont||ū||snægr-||i||yi||hol-||vlakh | |snægr-||i||hol-||wo||mall-||ap-||ont||ū||snægr-||i||yi||hol-||vlakh | ||
|- | |- | ||
|hate||3P||person||any||holy||make||PrP||such that||hate||PROX||person||folk | |hate||3P||person||any||holy||make||PrP||such that||hate||3p||PROX||person||folk | ||
|} | |} | ||
Whoever hates mankind hates God. | Whoever hates mankind hates God. | ||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
|ngabr-||i||khangaþ-||ge-||v-||ont||narr-||glæs||ū||snægr-||i||de||mall-||ap-||ont | |ngabr-||i||khangaþ-||ge-||v-||ont||narr-||glæs||ū||snægr-||i||de||mall-||ap-||ont | ||
|- | |- | ||
|defy||3P||magic||true||know||PrP||betray||spirit||such that||hate||OBV||holy||make||PrP | |defy||3P||magic||true||know||PrP||betray||spirit||such that||hate||3P||OBV||holy||make||PrP | ||
|} | |} | ||
The wizard defies the demon who hates God. | The wizard defies the demon who hates God. | ||
====Adverbial Clauses==== | |||
Adverbial clauses consist of an adverbial noun phrase (that is a noun phrase marked with segunakar giving it an adverbial sense), further qualified by a relative clause. The adverbial noun phrase will also be marked with a modsegunak. | |||
''mansti kemno zhelbanut ū dirrimir talpar þoa'' | |||
{| | |||
|manst-||i||kemno||zhel-||ban-||ut||ū||dirrim-||i-||r||talp-||ar||þoa | |||
|- | |||
|stand||3P||city||place||that||at||such that||reach||3P||PL||mountain||PL||sea | |||
|} | |||
The city stands where the mountains reach the sea. | |||
===Complement clauses=== | |||
A complement clause is a clause used as the complement to a verb. Two kinds exist in Khangaþyagon - Infinitive clauses and topical clauses | |||
====Infinitive clauses==== | |||
Infinitive clauses represent the idea of an an action in an abstract sense. The are often used for desires and purposes. In an infinitive clause, the verb is in the infinitive. There is no subject, but an object may be present. | |||
''tarrming Kæshroþrast markiso vlakhmark'' | |||
{| | |||
|tarrm ||i||ng||Kæshroþrast||markis||o||vlakh||mark | |||
|- | |||
|need||3P||PT||Kæshroþrast||counsel||INF||folk||chief | |||
|} | |||
Kæshroþrast needed to counsel a king. | |||
====Topical clauses==== | |||
tamiting yi mallsheuroshtkur, wiþingar yir zaldep mœza | Topical clauses describe an idea about a given topic, where the matrix clause describes knowledge, belief or communication of that idea. | ||
A typical use of topical clauses is reported speech. | |||
These clauses are expressed with a topic-comment structure. The topic is the most discourse-prominent component of the reported idea, and appears fronted and marked with the [[Khangaþyagon_Nouns|segunak]] ku. It is followed by the comment, a finite clause which represents a reported statement about the topic. Within the comment, the topic is represented by a [[Khangaþyagon_Pronouns|pronoun]], usually proximate. | |||
''tamiting yi mallsheuroshtkur, wiþingar yir zaldep mœza'' | |||
{| | {| | ||
|tamit ||i ||ng ||yi ||mall ||sheur ||osht ||ku ||r ||wiþ ||ing ||ar ||yi ||r ||zaldep ||mœza | |tamit ||i ||ng ||yi ||mall ||sheur ||osht ||ku ||r ||wiþ ||ing ||ar ||yi ||r ||zaldep ||mœza | ||
|- | |- | ||
|"believe unfoundedly" || | |"believe unfoundedly" ||3P||PT||3P||holy ||seclude ||PP||ABOUT||PL||have ||3P||PT||PL ||3P ||PL||treasure ||great | ||
|} | |} | ||
He believed (unfoundedly or insincerely) that the monks had great treasure. | He believed (unfoundedly or insincerely) that the monks had great treasure. | ||
===Action Nominal Constructions=== | ===Action Nominal Constructions=== |
Latest revision as of 01:58, 30 April 2022
Subordinate clauses, complement clauses and action nominals
Subordinate Clauses
Relative Clauses
These are introduced by the conjunction ū "such that". For example,
iðuzhang ya rik ū nellodahing yi
iðuzh | a | ng | ya | rik | ū | nello | dah | i | ng | yi |
see | 1p | pt | 1p | man | "such that" | worthy | be | 3p | pt | 3p |
I saw the man who was worthy.
Subordinate clauses are disfavoured as dependants of the subject in transitive sentences, due to the awkwardness of putting such a heavy constituent between the subject and the object. When absolutely necessary, subordinate clauses qualifying the subject may undergo extraposition and move to the end of the sentence. When a subordinate clause occurs finally in a sentence where both the subject and object are third person and the same number, a proximate pronoun in the subordinate clause refers to the subject, while an obviate refers to the object.
snægri holwo Mallapont ū snægri yi holvlakh
snægr- | i | hol- | wo | mall- | ap- | ont | ū | snægr- | i | yi | hol- | vlakh |
hate | 3P | person | any | holy | make | PrP | such that | hate | 3p | PROX | person | folk |
Whoever hates mankind hates God.
ngabri khangaþgevont narrglæs ū snægri de Mallapont
ngabr- | i | khangaþ- | ge- | v- | ont | narr- | glæs | ū | snægr- | i | de | mall- | ap- | ont |
defy | 3P | magic | true | know | PrP | betray | spirit | such that | hate | 3P | OBV | holy | make | PrP |
The wizard defies the demon who hates God.
Adverbial Clauses
Adverbial clauses consist of an adverbial noun phrase (that is a noun phrase marked with segunakar giving it an adverbial sense), further qualified by a relative clause. The adverbial noun phrase will also be marked with a modsegunak. mansti kemno zhelbanut ū dirrimir talpar þoa
manst- | i | kemno | zhel- | ban- | ut | ū | dirrim- | i- | r | talp- | ar | þoa |
stand | 3P | city | place | that | at | such that | reach | 3P | PL | mountain | PL | sea |
The city stands where the mountains reach the sea.
Complement clauses
A complement clause is a clause used as the complement to a verb. Two kinds exist in Khangaþyagon - Infinitive clauses and topical clauses
Infinitive clauses
Infinitive clauses represent the idea of an an action in an abstract sense. The are often used for desires and purposes. In an infinitive clause, the verb is in the infinitive. There is no subject, but an object may be present.
tarrming Kæshroþrast markiso vlakhmark
tarrm | i | ng | Kæshroþrast | markis | o | vlakh | mark |
need | 3P | PT | Kæshroþrast | counsel | INF | folk | chief |
Kæshroþrast needed to counsel a king.
Topical clauses
Topical clauses describe an idea about a given topic, where the matrix clause describes knowledge, belief or communication of that idea. A typical use of topical clauses is reported speech.
These clauses are expressed with a topic-comment structure. The topic is the most discourse-prominent component of the reported idea, and appears fronted and marked with the segunak ku. It is followed by the comment, a finite clause which represents a reported statement about the topic. Within the comment, the topic is represented by a pronoun, usually proximate.
tamiting yi mallsheuroshtkur, wiþingar yir zaldep mœza
tamit | i | ng | yi | mall | sheur | osht | ku | r | wiþ | ing | ar | yi | r | zaldep | mœza | |
"believe unfoundedly" | 3P | PT | 3P | holy | seclude | PP | ABOUT | PL | have | 3P | PT | PL | 3P | PL | treasure | great |
He believed (unfoundedly or insincerely) that the monks had great treasure.
Action Nominal Constructions
Action nominals are formed by an ergative pattern, where the participal verb is followed by the object, marked with the possessive segunak uz, and optionally the subject, marked with the instrumental segunak ol.
eskrontþað glafuz rikol
eskr- | ont- | það | glaf- | uz | rik- | ol |
ride | PrP | deed | horse | GEN | man | INST |
The riding of the horse by the man (the man's riding of the horse).
When the verb is intransitive, uz marks the subject.
peshtontþað akhrumuz
pesht- | ont- | það | akhrum- | uz |
run | PrP | deed | deer | GEN |
The running of the deer.
When the semantics of the verb is such that the roles of the arguments can be understood from context (men ride horses, horses do not ride men(as the Dothrak said), the object may be ommitted and the subject marked with uz
eskrontþað rikuz
eskr- | ont- | það | rik- | uz |
ride | PrP | deed | man | GEN |
The man's riding
eskrontþað glafuz
eskr- | ont- | það | glaf- | uz |
ride | PrP | deed | horse | GEN |
The riding of the horse.
This tends to correspond to verbs that still make sense when the object is omitted.
Back | Up | Next |
---|---|---|
Pronouns | Syntax | Questions, Commands, Conditionals and Counterfactuals |
--PeteBleackley 02:19, 6 June 2006 (PDT)