Faraneit Irregular Verbs: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "There are only a few irregular verbs in Faraneit, which were mainly produced relatively early in the language's history by sandhi. There is also a developing verbal subclass with...") |
|||
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
==To be - kej== | ==To be - kej== | ||
The origins of kej are in the [[Proto-Rajo-Faraneih]] roots of *kɒ (existence) and the increasingly pervasive clitic. Early in Faraneit linguistic history the endings of the newly fused verb experienced external sandhi with the still almost always included pronouns. For example, the first person singular form underwent these changes: | |||
*[keʒi ɑv] > [keʒˌjɑv] > [keʒ jɑv] > [keʒ ɑv] (mutation on the pronoun undone by analogy) | |||
Occasionally the results were more intriguing, as with the plural second person irrealis form, which also experienced more internal sound change with speakers anticipating making a similar sound and replacing the first with the same phone: | |||
*[keneɪ maʊli] > [keneɪˌmaʊli] > [keniˌmɔlɪ] > [kenim mɔlɪ] > [kemim mɔlɪ] | |||
These mutated verbal endings replaced the original conjugation pattern even when pronouns were dropped (which quickly became normal as Faraneit developed) or when the verb referred to a noun, rather than pronoun. The resulting paradigm (leaving off the root or various tense infixes) was- | |||
Realis forms: | |||
{| border=1 | |||
! | |||
|align=center| Singular | |||
|align=center| Plural | |||
|- | |||
! First Person | |||
|align=center| -j | |||
|align=center| -jei | |||
|- | |||
! Second Person | |||
|align=center| -ji | |||
|align=center| -ji | |||
|- | |||
! Third Person | |||
|align=center| -j | |||
|align=center| -joa | |||
|- | |||
|} | |||
Irrealis forms: | |||
{| border=1 | |||
! | |||
|align=center| Singular | |||
|align=center| Plural | |||
|- | |||
! First Person | |||
|align=center| -n | |||
|align=center| -nei | |||
|- | |||
! Second Person | |||
|align=center| -nin | |||
|align=center| -mim | |||
|- | |||
! Third Person | |||
|align=center| -n | |||
|align=center| -noat | |||
|- | |||
|} | |||
Optative forms: | |||
{| border=1 | |||
! | |||
|align=center| Singular | |||
|align=center| Plural | |||
|- | |||
! First Person | |||
|align=center| -sc | |||
|align=center| -tei | |||
|- | |||
! Second Person | |||
|align=center| -tin | |||
|align=center| -tim | |||
|- | |||
! Third Person | |||
|align=center| -d | |||
|align=center| -toat | |||
|- | |||
|} | |||
==To hold - rej== | ==To hold - rej== | ||
The verb rej underwent the same external sandhi but with (eventually reversed) additional internal haplology in third person simple past forms. In those specific circumstances, the verbal endings developed thus for singular: | |||
Realis: *[χoʒo don] > [χoʒodon] > [χoʒdon] > [χʒdon] > [χχdon] > [χaχdon] > [χaʁ don] (by analogy with /ʁ/'s allophony) | |||
Irrealis: *[χono don] > [χonodon] > [χondon] > [χndon] > [χandon] > [χan don] | |||
Optative: *[χoto don] > [χotodon] > [χotdon] > [χtdon] > [χqdon] > [χaqdon] > [χaq don] | |||
As a result the simple past, singular third person paradigms for rej, kej, and regular verb bafhej (to sit) can be contrasted- | |||
{| border=1 | |||
! | |||
|align=center| '''Rej''' | |||
|align=center| '''Kej''' | |||
|align=center| '''Bafhej''' | |||
|- | |||
! Realis | |||
|align=center| rar | |||
|align=center| koaj | |||
|align=center| bafhoajoa | |||
|- | |||
! Irrealis | |||
|align=center| ran | |||
|align=center| koan | |||
|align=center| bafhoanoa | |||
|- | |||
! Optative | |||
|align=center| raq | |||
|align=center| koad | |||
|align=center| bafhoatoa | |||
|- | |||
|} | |||
A similar haplology didn't happened with plural third person and simple past forms of rej, as haplology was only triggered for three consecutive syllables with the same unstressed stressed vowel (the secondary stress typically placed on the pronouns after kej prevented the same situation developing). The diachronics, for this interested were as follows, analogous with other tenses for rej and the same forms for kej: | |||
Realis: *[χoʒo tip] > [χoʒoˌtip] > [χɔʒɔˌtip] > [χɔʒɔ tip] | |||
Irrealis: *[χono tip] > [χonoˌtip] > [χɔnɔˌtip] > [χɔnɔt tip] | |||
Optative: *[χoto tip] > [χotoˌtip] > [χɔtɔˌtip] > [χɔtɔt tip] | |||
==Developing Subclass of -scej verbs== | ==Developing Subclass of -scej verbs== |
Latest revision as of 23:33, 29 September 2012
There are only a few irregular verbs in Faraneit, which were mainly produced relatively early in the language's history by sandhi. There is also a developing verbal subclass with a slightly altered conjugation paradigm.
To be - kej
The origins of kej are in the Proto-Rajo-Faraneih roots of *kɒ (existence) and the increasingly pervasive clitic. Early in Faraneit linguistic history the endings of the newly fused verb experienced external sandhi with the still almost always included pronouns. For example, the first person singular form underwent these changes:
- [keʒi ɑv] > [keʒˌjɑv] > [keʒ jɑv] > [keʒ ɑv] (mutation on the pronoun undone by analogy)
Occasionally the results were more intriguing, as with the plural second person irrealis form, which also experienced more internal sound change with speakers anticipating making a similar sound and replacing the first with the same phone:
- [keneɪ maʊli] > [keneɪˌmaʊli] > [keniˌmɔlɪ] > [kenim mɔlɪ] > [kemim mɔlɪ]
These mutated verbal endings replaced the original conjugation pattern even when pronouns were dropped (which quickly became normal as Faraneit developed) or when the verb referred to a noun, rather than pronoun. The resulting paradigm (leaving off the root or various tense infixes) was-
Realis forms:
Singular | Plural | |
First Person | -j | -jei |
Second Person | -ji | -ji |
Third Person | -j | -joa |
Irrealis forms:
Singular | Plural | |
First Person | -n | -nei |
Second Person | -nin | -mim |
Third Person | -n | -noat |
Optative forms:
Singular | Plural | |
First Person | -sc | -tei |
Second Person | -tin | -tim |
Third Person | -d | -toat |
To hold - rej
The verb rej underwent the same external sandhi but with (eventually reversed) additional internal haplology in third person simple past forms. In those specific circumstances, the verbal endings developed thus for singular:
Realis: *[χoʒo don] > [χoʒodon] > [χoʒdon] > [χʒdon] > [χχdon] > [χaχdon] > [χaʁ don] (by analogy with /ʁ/'s allophony)
Irrealis: *[χono don] > [χonodon] > [χondon] > [χndon] > [χandon] > [χan don]
Optative: *[χoto don] > [χotodon] > [χotdon] > [χtdon] > [χqdon] > [χaqdon] > [χaq don]
As a result the simple past, singular third person paradigms for rej, kej, and regular verb bafhej (to sit) can be contrasted-
Rej | Kej | Bafhej | |
Realis | rar | koaj | bafhoajoa |
Irrealis | ran | koan | bafhoanoa |
Optative | raq | koad | bafhoatoa |
A similar haplology didn't happened with plural third person and simple past forms of rej, as haplology was only triggered for three consecutive syllables with the same unstressed stressed vowel (the secondary stress typically placed on the pronouns after kej prevented the same situation developing). The diachronics, for this interested were as follows, analogous with other tenses for rej and the same forms for kej:
Realis: *[χoʒo tip] > [χoʒoˌtip] > [χɔʒɔˌtip] > [χɔʒɔ tip]
Irrealis: *[χono tip] > [χonoˌtip] > [χɔnɔˌtip] > [χɔnɔt tip]
Optative: *[χoto tip] > [χotoˌtip] > [χɔtɔˌtip] > [χɔtɔt tip]