Voiceless labial-velar approximant: Difference between revisions
m (moved Voiceless Labial-Velar Approximate to Voiceless labial-velar approximant: no caps for phoneme names, approximant pro *approximate) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| Place of Articulation: || [[Velar]] [[bilabial]] | | Place of Articulation: || [[Velar]] [[bilabial]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Manner of Articulation: || [[ | | Manner of Articulation: || [[approximant]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [[Phonological feature]]s: || [-consonantal] <br> '''[-Voice]''' <br> [+round] <br> | | [[Phonological feature]]s: || [-consonantal] <br> '''[-Voice]''' <br> [+round] <br> | ||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
==Old Norse== | ==Old Norse== | ||
In [[Old Norse]], | In [[Old Norse]], a cognate sound was spelt '''hv''' and was used in cases similar to the Old English words. However, since it is reflected as /hv/ in East Scandinavian, /kv/ in [[Icelandic]], and it derives from [[Proto-Germanic]] *xw, it should not be taken as [ʍ], but rather as a cluster [xv] or [xʋ]. | ||
=Sources= | =Sources= | ||
| Line 39: | Line 38: | ||
Back to [[IPA]]. | Back to [[IPA]]. | ||
Page written by [[Timothy Patrick Snyder]] | Page written by [[Timothy Patrick Snyder]] | ||
[[Category:Phonetic segments]] | |||
Latest revision as of 00:56, 28 September 2014
| ʍ | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pulmonic Consonant | ||
| IPA: | ʍ | |
| Place of Articulation: | Velar bilabial | |
| Manner of Articulation: | approximant | |
| Phonological features: | [-consonantal] [-Voice] [+round] |
[-Syllabic] |
This is a devoiced bilabial velar approximate. It's voiced form is /w/.
Natlangs
English
Old English
In Old English it was spelt Hw. An example might be the first line of Beowulf "Hwæt we Gar-Dena...." Other Anglo-Saxon words had this spelling, such as Hwær (where). Hwam (whom), Hwalas (whales), Hwon (who), Hwi (why). etc.
Middle English
This sound had three different spellings in Medieval English, but the most common was wh. In the earliest days, in such works as Brut we see that they prefer Anglo-Saxon spelling, so hw is most common. In works which have a heavy Old French influence it is common to see qu instead of the others, because qu /kw/ is the closest sounds French equivalent. Geoffrey Chaucer, being one of the most influential to standardised English, used wh.
Modern English
Most people who speak English today now use /w/ instead of the /ʍ/. Some Dialects in the Northwest of the United States and quite a few Scottish accents still use it. Also many English speaks come close when they add a devoiced sound next to it, so 'twas, quest, sweet, and others have semi-devoiced /ʍ/s in them.
Old Norse
In Old Norse, a cognate sound was spelt hv and was used in cases similar to the Old English words. However, since it is reflected as /hv/ in East Scandinavian, /kv/ in Icelandic, and it derives from Proto-Germanic *xw, it should not be taken as [ʍ], but rather as a cluster [xv] or [xʋ].
Sources
http://www.huitalk.com/articles/is-middle-english-a-creole
http://www.huitalk.com/activities/introduction-to-the-ipa-consonants-the-sounds-of-english
Back to IPA. Page written by Timothy Patrick Snyder
