The wiki has recently been updated. Please contact me by talk page or email if you encounter any issues.

Constructed language: Difference between revisions

From FrathWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
(14 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
An '''artificial''' or '''constructed language''' (known colloquially as a '''conlang''' among [[aficionado]]s), is a [[language]] whose [[phonology]],  [[grammar]] and [[vocabulary]] are specifically devised by an individual or small group, rather than having naturally evolved as part of a [[culture]] the way [[natural language]]s do.  Some are designed for use in human [[communication]] (usually to function as [[international auxiliary language]]s), but others are created for use in fiction, [[linguistics|linguistic]] experimentation, secrecy ([[code]]s), or for the experience of doing so ([[artistic language]]s, [[Language game (linguistics)|language games]]). These languages are sometimes associated with [[constructed world]]s.
{{Brokenlinks}}


The synonym '''''planned language''''' is sometimes used when referring to [[international auxiliary language]]s, and by those who may object to the more common term "artificial". Some speakers of [[Esperanto]] avoid the term "artificial language" because they deny that there is something "unnatural" in communicating in this language.  However,  outside the [[Esperanto community]] the term [[language planning]] refers to prescriptive measures taken regarding a natural language. In this regard, even "natural languages" may be submitted to a certain amount of artificiality, and in the case of [[prescriptive grammar]]s, the line is difficult to draw.
An '''artificial''' or '''constructed language''' (known colloquially as a '''[[conlang]]''' among aficionados), is a [[Wikipedia:Language|language]] whose [[Wikipedia:Phonology|phonology]], [[Wikipedia:Grammar|grammar]] and [[Wikipedia:Vocabulary|vocabulary]] are specifically devised by an individual or group, rather than having naturally evolved as part of a culture the way [[natural language]]s do.   
 
'''[[Conlang]]''' stands for '''con'''structed '''lang'''uage, in contrast to '''[[natlang]]''' for '''nat'''ural '''lang'''uage.  Other general terms in use for conlangs in the past, but less popular in recent years, include "invented language", "artificial language", and "model language"; the latter-most term was popularized by Jeffrey Henning in the mid-1990s, but seems to have fallen out of general use.


==Overview ==
==Overview ==
 
===Types and classifications of conlangs===
Constructed languages are often divided into '''''[[a priori]]'' languages''', in which much of the grammar and vocabulary is created from scratch (using the author's imagination or automatic computational means), and '''''[[a posteriori]]'' languages''', where the grammar and vocabulary are derived from one or more natural languages.
Constructed languages are often divided into '''''[[a priori]]'' languages''', in which much of the grammar and vocabulary is created from scratch (using the author's imagination or automatic computational means), and '''''[[a posteriori]]'' languages''', where the grammar and vocabulary are derived from one or more natural languages.


Fictional and experimental languages can also be naturalistic, in the sense that they are meant to sound natural and, if derived ''a posteriori'', they try to follow natural rules of [[phonology|phonological]], lexical and [[grammar|grammatical]] change. Since these languages are not usually intended for easy learning or communication, a naturalistic fictional language tends to be more difficult and complex, not less (because it tries to mimic common behaviours of natural languages such as irregular verbs and nouns, complicated phonological rules, etc.).
Fictional and experimental languages can be naturalistic in the sense that they are meant to sound natural. If the language is ''a posteriori'', it tries to follow natural rules of phonological, lexical and grammatical change. Since these languages are not usually intended for easy learning or communication, a naturalistic fictional languages tend to be more difficult and complex.  This is because they attempt to mimic common behaviors of natural languages such as irregular verbs and nouns, complicated phonological rules, etc.


In light of the above, most constructed languages can broadly be divided as follows:
In light of the above, most constructed languages can broadly be divided as follows:


* '''[[Engineered language]]s''' (''engelangs''), further subdivided into '''philosophical languages''' and '''logical languages''' (''loglangs'') - devised for the purpose of experimentation in [[logic]] or [[philosophy]]
* '''Engineered languages''' (''[[engelang]]s''), further subdivided into '''philosophical languages''' and '''logical languages''' (''loglangs'') - devised for the purpose of experimentation in logic or philosophy
* '''[[Auxiliary language]]s''' (''auxlangs'') - devised for international communication (also IALs, for International Auxiliary Language)
* '''Auxiliary languages''' (''[[auxlang]]s'') - devised for international communication (also IALs, for International Auxiliary Language)
* '''[[Artistic language]]s''' (''artlangs'') - devised to create aesthetic pleasure
* '''Artistic languages''' (''[[artlang]]s'') - devised to create aesthetic pleasure


The boundaries between these categories, however, are by no means clear.  For example, for some fictional auxiliary languages, and also some constructed languages, it is hard to decide whether they are "artistic" or "engineered".
The boundaries between these categories, however, are by no means clear.  For example, for some fictional auxiliary languages, and also some constructed languages, it is hard to decide whether they are "artistic" or "engineered".


A constructed language can have native speakers if children learn it at an early age from parents who have learned the language. [[Esperanto]] has a considerable number of [[Native Esperanto speakers|native speakers]], variously estimated to be between 200 and 2000. A member of the [[Klingon Language Institute]], [[d'Armond Speers]], attempted to raise his son as a native (bilingual with English) [[Klingon language|Klingon]] speaker. Evan Robertson, the creator of [[Mosro]], successfully taught the language to his four youngest children.  However, as soon as a constructed language ''does'' have a number of native speakers, it begins to evolve, and thereby loses its constructed status over time.  For example [[Hebrew language|Modern Hebrew]] was modelled on Biblical Hebrew rather than engineered from scratch, and has undergone considerable changes since the state of [[Israel]] was founded in [[1948]].
===Living Conlangs===
A constructed language can have native speakers if children learn it at an early age from parents who have learned the language. There have been some incidences of this in the past:


Proponents of particular constructed languages often have many reasons for using them. Among these, the famous but disputed [[Sapir-Whorf hypothesis]] is often cited; this claims that the language one speaks influences the way in which one thinks. Thus, a "better" language should allow the speaker to reach some elevated level of intelligence, or to encompass more diverse points of view.
*[[Esperanto]] has a considerable number of native speakers, variously estimated to be between 200 and 2000.  
*One afficianado of [[Klingon]] attempted to raise one of his children as a native speaker who would become bilingual with English and Klingon as his first languages. the attempt failed, however, as the child grew frustrated with an inability to communicate with other people in this language, and also a lack of vocabulary for everyday things.


In the [[CONLANG]] Mailing List, a community of [[conlanger]]s has developed, which has its own customs, such as [[translation relay]]s.
However, as soon as a constructed language ''does'' have a number of native speakers, it begins to evolve, and thereby loses its constructed status over time.  For example, Modern Hebrew was modelled on Biblical Hebrew rather than engineered from scratch, and has undergone considerable change in modern Israel.
 
===Justifications for using constructed languages===
Proponents of particular constructed languages often have many reasons for using them. 
 
Among these, the famous but disputed [[Sapir-Whorf hypothesis]] is often cited; this claims that the language one speaks influences the way in which one thinks. Thus, a "better" language should allow the speaker to reach some elevated level of intelligence, or to encompass more diverse points of view.
 
===The conlanger community===
In the [http://listserv.brown.edu/archives/conlang.html CONLANG mailing list], an online community of conlangers has developed, which has its own customs, such as the [[conlang relay]] game.


==History==
==History==


Grammatical speculation is documented from [[Classical Antiquity]], with [[Plato]]'s ''[[Cratylus]]''. However the suggested mechanisms of grammar were designed to explain existing languages ([[Latin]], [[Greek language|Greek]], [[Sanskrit]]), and not aiming at constructing new grammars.  Roughly contemporary to Plato, in his descriptive grammar of Sanskrit, [[Pāṇini]] constructed a meta-linguistic formalism, so that the text of his grammar may be considered a mixture of natural and constructed language.
Grammatical speculation is documented from Classical Antiquity, with Plato's ''Cratylus''. However the suggested mechanisms of grammar were designed to explain existing languages ([[Latin]], [[Greek language|Greek]], [[Sanskrit]]), and not aiming at constructing new grammars.  Roughly contemporary to Plato, in his descriptive grammar of Sanskrit, Pāṇini constructed a meta-linguistic formalism, so that the text of his grammar may be considered a mixture of natural and constructed language.


The earliest non-natural languages were not so much considered "constructed" as "super-natural" or mystical. The  [[Lingua Ignota]], recorded in the [[12th century]] by St [[Hildegard of Bingen]] is an example of this, apparently it is a form of private mystical [[cant (language)|cant]] (see also [[language of angels]]).  [[Kabbalistic]] grammatical speculation was directed at recovering the original language spoken by [[Adam and Eve]] in [[Paradise]], lost in the [[confusion of tongues]]. The first [[Christian]] project for an ideal language is outlined in [[Dante Alighieri]]'s ''[[De vulgari eloquentia]]'', where he searches for the ideal Italian vernacular suited for literature.  [[Ramon Llull|Raymond Lull]]'s ''Ars magna'' was a project of a perfect language with which the infidels could be convinced of the truth of the Christian faith.  It was basically an application of [[combinatorics]] on a given set of concepts.  During the [[Renaissance]], Lullian and Kabbalistic ideas were carried ''ad absurdum'' in a [[Magical thinking|magical]] context, resulting in [[cryptography|cryptographic]] applications. The [[Voynich manuscript]] may be an example of this. Renaissance interest in [[Ancient Egypt]], notably the discovery of the ''[[Hieroglyphica]]'' of [[Horapollo]], and first encounters with the [[Chinese script]] directed efforts towards a perfect language of written characters.  [[Johannes Trithemius]], in his works ''Steganographia'' and ''Polygraphia'', attempted to show how all languages can be reduced to one.  In the [[17th century]], interest in [[Magical thinking|magical]] languages was continued  by the [[Rosicrucians]] and [[Alchemy|Alchemists]] (like [[John Dee]]).  [[Jakob Boehme]] in [[1623]] spoke of a "natural language" (''Natursprache'') of the senses.
===The earliest recorded conlangs===
The earliest non-natural languages were not so much considered "constructed" as "super-natural" or mystical. The  [[Lingua Ignota]], recorded in the 12th century by St [[Hildegard of Bingen]] is an example of this, apparently it is a form of private mystical cant.  Kabbalistic grammatical speculation was directed at recovering the original language spoken by Adam and Eve in Paradise, lost in the confusion of tongues.  


[[Musical language]]s from the Renaissance were tied up with [[mysticism]], magic and alchemy, sometimes also referred to as the [[language of the birds]].  The [[Solresol language|Solresol]] project of [[1817]] re-invented the concept in a more pragmatic context.
The first Christian project for an ideal language is outlined in Dante Alighieri's ''De vulgari eloquentia'', where he searches for the ideal Italian vernacular suited for literature.  Raymond Lull's ''Ars magna'' was a project of a perfect language with which the infidels could be convinced of the truth of the Christian faith.  It was basically an application of combinatorics on a given set of concepts.


The 17th century also saw the rise of projects for "philosophical" or "a priori" languages.  Pioneered by [[Francis Lodwick]]'s ''A Common Writing'' ([[1647]]) and ''The Groundwork or Foundation laid (or So Intended) for the Framing of a New Perfect Language and a Universal Common Writing'' ([[1652]]),  [[George Dalgarno]] (''Ars signorum'', [[1661]]) and [[John Wilkins]] (''Essay towards a Real Character, and a Philosophical Language'', [[1668]]) produced systems of hierarchical classification that were intended to result in both spoken and written expression.  [[Gottfried Leibniz]] with ''lingua generalis'' in [[1678]] pursued a similar end, aiming at a lexicon of characters upon which the user might perform calculations that would yield true propositions automatically, as a side-effect developing [[binary calculus]]. These projects were not only occupied with reducing or modelling grammar, but also with the arrangement of all human knowledge into "characters" or hierarchies, an idea that with the [[Age of Enlightenment|Enlightenment]] would ultimately lead to the ''[[Encyclopédie]]''.
During the Renaissance, Lullian and Kabbalistic ideas were carried ''ad absurdum'' in a magical context, resulting in cryptographic applications. The [[Voynich manuscript]] may be an example of this. Renaissance interest in ancient Egypt, notably the discovery of the ''Hieroglyphica'' of Horapollo, and first encounters with the Chinese script directed efforts towards a perfect language of written characters.


Leibniz and the encyclopedists realized that it is impossible to organize human knowledge unequivocally in a tree diagram, and consequently to construct an ''a priori'' language based on such a classification of concepts.  Under the entry ''Charactère'', [[D'Alembert]] critically reviewed the projects of philosophical languages of the preceding century.  From the ''Encyclopédie'', projects for ''a priori'' languages moved more and more to the lunatic fringe. Individual authors, typically unaware of the history of the idea, continued to propose taxonomic philosophical languages until the early [[20th century]] (e.g. [[Ro]]), but most recent [[engineered language]]s have had more modest goals; some are limited to a specific field, like mathematical formalism or calculus (e.g. [[Lincos (language)|Lincos]] and [[programming language]]s), others are designed for eliminating syntactical ambiguity (e.g., [[Loglan]] and [[Lojban]]) or maximizing conciseness (e.g., [[Ithkuil]]).
Johannes Trithemius, in his works ''Steganographia'' and ''Polygraphia'', attempted to show how all languages can be reduced to one.  In the 17th century, interest in magical languages was continued by the Rosicrucians and alchemists (like John Dee).


Already in the ''Encyclopédie'' attention began to focus on ''a posteriori'' auxiliary languages. [[Joachim Faiguet]] in the article on ''Langue'' already wrote a short proposition of a "laconic" or regularized grammar of [[French (language)|French]]. During the [[19th century]], a bewildering variety of such International Auxiliary Languages (IALs) were proposed, so that [[Louis Couturat]] and [[Leopold Leau]] in ''Historire de la langue universelle'' ([[1903]]) could review 38 projects.  The first of these that made any international impact was [[Volapük]], proposed in [[1879]] by [[Johann Martin Schleyer]], and within a decade, 283 Volapükist clubs were counted all over the globe.  However, this language by its very success lost its unity, and within a few years, fell into obscurity, making way for [[Esperanto]], proposed in [[1887]] by [[L. L. Zamenhof|Ludwik Lejzer Zamenhof]], the most successful IAL to date. [[Loglan]] ([[1955]]) and its descendants constitute a pragmatic return to the aims of the ''a priori'' languages, tempered by the requirement of usability of an auxiliary language.
Jakob Boehme in 1623 spoke of a "natural language" (''Natursprache'') of the senses.


Artistic languages, constructed for literary enjoyment or aesthetic reasons without any claim of usefulness, begin to appear in Early Modern literature (in [[Gargantua and Pantagruel|Pantagruel]], and in [[Utopia]]n contexts), but they only seem to gain notability as serious projects from the [[20th century]].  ''[[A Princess of Mars]]'' by [[Edgar Rice Burroughs]] was possibly the first fiction of the 20th century to feature a constructed language.  [[J. R. R. Tolkien]] was the first to develop a family of related fictional languages and was the first academic to publicly discuss artistic languages, admitting to ''[[A Secret Vice]]'' of his in [[1930]] at an Esperanto congress. ([[George Orwell]]'s ''[[Newspeak]]'' should be considered a parody of an IAL rather than an artistic language proper.)
===Musical Languages===
Musical languages from the Renaissance were tied up with mysticism, magic and alchemy, sometimes also referred to as the language of the birds.   


By the turn of the [[21st century]], it had become common for science-fiction and fantasy works set in other worlds to feature constructed languages, and constructed languages are a regular part of movies of the genre, including ''[[Star Wars]]'', ''[[Star Trek]]'', ''[[Stargate SG-1]]'' and ''[[Atlantis: The Lost Empire]]''.
The [[Solresol]] project of 1817 re-invented the concept in a more pragmatic context.


== See also ==
===The advent of Loglangs===
The 17th century also saw the rise of projects for "philosophical" or "a priori" languages. 


* [[List of constructed languages]]
Pioneered by Francis Lodwick's ''A Common Writing'' (1647) and ''The Groundwork or Foundation laid (or So Intended) for the Framing of a New Perfect Language and a Universal Common Writing'' (1652),  George Dalgarno (''Ars signorum'', 1661) and John Wilkins (''Essay towards a Real Character, and a Philosophical Language'', 1668) produced systems of hierarchical classification that were intended to result in both spoken and written expression.  Gottfried Leibniz with ''lingua generalis'' in 1678 pursued a similar end, aiming at a lexicon of characters upon which the user might perform calculations that would yield true propositions automatically, as a side-effect developing binary calculus.
* [[Universal language]]
 
* Language construction
These projects were not only occupied with reducing or modelling grammar, but also with the arrangement of all human knowledge into "characters" or hierarchies, an idea that with the Enlightenment would ultimately lead to the ''Encyclopédie''.
** [[CONLANG]], [[conlanger]]
 
** [[List of language regulators|Language regulator]]
Leibniz and the encyclopedists realized that it is impossible to organize human knowledge unequivocally in a tree diagram, and consequently to construct an ''a priori'' language based on such a classification of concepts.  Under the entry ''Charactère'', D'Alembert critically reviewed the projects of philosophical languages of the preceding century. 
** [[Language Construction Kit]]
 
** [[Language game (linguistics)]]
From the ''Encyclopédie'', projects for ''a priori'' languages became more and more extreme.  Individual authors, typically unaware of the history of the idea, continued to propose taxonomic philosophical languages until the early 20th century (e.g. [[Ro]]), but most recent engineered languages have had more modest goals; some are limited to a specific field, like mathematical formalism or calculus (e.g. Lincos and computer programming languages), others are designed for eliminating syntactical ambiguity (e.g., [[Loglan]] and [[Lojban]]) or maximizing conciseness (e.g., [[Ithkuil]]).
** [[Artificial script]]
 
* Language modelling and translation
===A Posteriori Languages===
** [[Language translation]]
Already in the ''Encyclopédie'' attention began to focus on ''a posteriori'' auxiliary languages. Joachim Faiguet in the article on ''Langue'' already wrote a short proposition of a "laconic" or regularized grammar of [[French]].
** [[Knowledge representation]]
 
** [[Translation relay]]
During the 19th century, a bewildering variety of such International Auxiliary Languages were proposed, so that Louis Couturat and Leopold Leau in ''Historire de la langue universelle'' (1903) could review 38 projects. 
** [[Universal grammar]]
 
** [[Metalanguage]]
===Volapük, Esperanto and Loglan===
* Prescriptive grammar
The first of these that made any international impact was [[Volapük]], proposed in 1879 by Johann Martin Schleyer, and within a decade, 283 Volapükist clubs were counted all over the globe.  However, this language by its very success lost its unity, and within a few years, fell into obscurity, making way for [[Esperanto]], proposed in 1887 by [[L. L. Zamenhof|Ludwik Lejzer Zamenhof]], the most successful IAL to date.
** [[Language planning]]
 
** [[Linguistic protectionism]]
Loglan (1955) and its descendants constitute a pragmatic return to the aims of the ''a priori'' languages, tempered by the requirement of usability of an auxiliary language.
** [[List of language regulators]]
 
** [[Spelling reform]]
===Artlangs in Fiction===
** [[Pāṇini]]
Artistic languages, constructed for literary enjoyment or aesthetic reasons without any claim of pragmatic usefulness, begin to appear in early modern literature (in ''Gargantua and Pantagruel'', and in utopian contexts), but they only seem to gain notability as serious projects from the 20th century. 
** [[Duden]], [[German spelling reform of 1996]]
 
* Spontaneous emergence of grammar
*''A Princess of Mars'' by Edgar Rice Burroughs was possibly the first fiction of the 20th century to feature a constructed language. 
** [[Glottogony]]
*[[J. R. R. Tolkien]] was the first to develop a family of related fictional languages and was the first academic to publicly discuss artistic languages, admitting to ''[[A Secret Vice]]'' of his in 1930 at an Esperanto congress.
** [[Pidgin]]
*George Orwell's ''[[Newspeak]]'' takes the ideas of language planning, centralized government and thought control by the State to their extremes.
** [[Poto and Cabengo]]
 
** [[June and Jennifer Gibbons]]
By the turn of the 21st century, it had become common for science-fiction and fantasy works set in other worlds to feature constructed languages, and constructed languages are a regular part of movies of the genre, including ''Star Wars'', ''Star Trek'', etr.
* Mystical languages
** [[Glossolalia]]
** [[Language of the birds]]


== References ==
== References ==


* [[Alan Libert]], ''A Priori Artificial Languages''. [[Lincom Europa]], Munich, [[2000]]. ISBN 3-89586-667-9
* Alan Libert, ''A Priori Artificial Languages''. Lincom Europa, Munich, 2000. ISBN 3-89586-667-9
* [[Umberto Eco]], ''The search for the perfect language'', [[1993]].
* Umberto Eco, ''The search for the perfect language'', 1993.
 
== External links ==
{{Wikibooks|Conlang}}


=== Scholarship ===
=== Scholarship ===


* [http://64.233.179.104/search?q=cache:C4Pf-lezOvAJ:journal.media-culture.org.au/0003/languages.php+site:journal.media-culture.org.au+constructed+language&hl=en Audience, Uglossia, and CONLANG: Inventing Languages on the Internet] by Sarah L. Higley. M/C: A Journal of Media and Culture 3.1 (2000).
* [http://64.233.179.104/search?q=cache:C4Pf-lezOvAJ:journal.media-culture.org.au/0003/languages.php+site:journal.media-culture.org.au+constructed+language&hl=en Audience, Uglossia, and CONLANG: Inventing Languages on the Internet] by Sarah L. Higley. M/C: A Journal of Media and Culture 3.1 (2000).
* [http://sources.conlang.org The Conlang Sources Wiki] A wiki dedicated to scholarship, criticism, journalism and other third party writing about conlangs.
<!-- used Google cache because can't access the original article.  Should try again later. -->
<!-- used Google cache because can't access the original article.  Should try again later. -->
*[http://www.langmaker.com/outpost/outpost.htm Language Arts Outpost] preserves several articles from the paper zine ''Journal of Planned Languages''
*[http://www.langmaker.com/outpost/outpost.htm Language Arts Outpost] preserves several articles from the paper zine ''Journal of Planned Languages''
Line 101: Line 111:
* [http://www.artlangs.com ArtLangs.com :: The ArtLangs Community] - A forum and site on conlanging and conworlding
* [http://www.artlangs.com ArtLangs.com :: The ArtLangs Community] - A forum and site on conlanging and conworlding
* [http://www.conlanger.com Conlanger.com] - A multilingual forum and link collection for conlanging
* [http://www.conlanger.com Conlanger.com] - A multilingual forum and link collection for conlanging
* [irc://irc.efnet.net/ConLang #ConLang] - The IRC channel #ConLang on EFNet
* [irc://irc.freenode.net/conlang #conlang] - The IRC channel #conlang on Freenode
*[http://scriptorium.17.forumer.com/index.php Scriptorium Bulletin Board] &mdash; A forum primarily devoted to artificial and natural writing systems


===How to===
===How to===


* [http://zompist.com/kit.html The Language Construction Kit]
* [http://zompist.com/kit.html The Language Construction Kit]
* [http://pueblacity.com/ego-pdf/ng/lng/how/index.html How to Create a Language] by [[Pablo David Flores]], inspired by the Language Construction Kit; covers some overlooked topics
* [http://pueblacity.com/ego-pdf/ng/lng/how/index.html How to Create a Language] by Pablo David Flores, inspired by the Language Construction Kit; covers some overlooked topics
** [http://pueblacity.com/ego-pdf/sp/lng/como/index.html Cómo crear un lenguaje] - [[Spanish language]] version
** [http://pueblacity.com/ego-pdf/sp/lng/como/index.html Cómo crear un lenguaje] - [[Spanish language]] version
* [http://langmaker.com/ Langmaker: ConLangs and neologisms forum]
* [http://langmaker.com/ Langmaker: ConLangs and neologisms forum]
Line 125: Line 134:
*[http://www.langmaker.com/db/rsc_a2z_index.htm More Internet resources relating to constructed languages]
*[http://www.langmaker.com/db/rsc_a2z_index.htm More Internet resources relating to constructed languages]


===Wikis on or about constructed languages===
* [http://talideon.com/concultures/wiki ConlangWiki] - a wiki devoted to the topics of ConLangs and ConCultures.
* [http://conlang.wikicities.com/ Conlang Wikicity]
* [http://ial.wikicities.com/ IAL Wiki] - a wiki for the Auxlang community
* [http://home.unilang.org/main/wiki Unilang.org] - a database of language- and linguistic-related information




{{wikipedia}}
{{wikipedia}}

Latest revision as of 08:37, 25 August 2017

There are a lot of red links in this article!

If you can, please help clean this up by fixing the links or creating the missing pages.

An artificial or constructed language (known colloquially as a conlang among aficionados), is a language whose phonology, grammar and vocabulary are specifically devised by an individual or group, rather than having naturally evolved as part of a culture the way natural languages do.

Conlang stands for constructed language, in contrast to natlang for natural language. Other general terms in use for conlangs in the past, but less popular in recent years, include "invented language", "artificial language", and "model language"; the latter-most term was popularized by Jeffrey Henning in the mid-1990s, but seems to have fallen out of general use.

Overview

Types and classifications of conlangs

Constructed languages are often divided into a priori languages, in which much of the grammar and vocabulary is created from scratch (using the author's imagination or automatic computational means), and a posteriori languages, where the grammar and vocabulary are derived from one or more natural languages.

Fictional and experimental languages can be naturalistic in the sense that they are meant to sound natural. If the language is a posteriori, it tries to follow natural rules of phonological, lexical and grammatical change. Since these languages are not usually intended for easy learning or communication, a naturalistic fictional languages tend to be more difficult and complex. This is because they attempt to mimic common behaviors of natural languages such as irregular verbs and nouns, complicated phonological rules, etc.

In light of the above, most constructed languages can broadly be divided as follows:

  • Engineered languages (engelangs), further subdivided into philosophical languages and logical languages (loglangs) - devised for the purpose of experimentation in logic or philosophy
  • Auxiliary languages (auxlangs) - devised for international communication (also IALs, for International Auxiliary Language)
  • Artistic languages (artlangs) - devised to create aesthetic pleasure

The boundaries between these categories, however, are by no means clear. For example, for some fictional auxiliary languages, and also some constructed languages, it is hard to decide whether they are "artistic" or "engineered".

Living Conlangs

A constructed language can have native speakers if children learn it at an early age from parents who have learned the language. There have been some incidences of this in the past:

  • Esperanto has a considerable number of native speakers, variously estimated to be between 200 and 2000.
  • One afficianado of Klingon attempted to raise one of his children as a native speaker who would become bilingual with English and Klingon as his first languages. the attempt failed, however, as the child grew frustrated with an inability to communicate with other people in this language, and also a lack of vocabulary for everyday things.

However, as soon as a constructed language does have a number of native speakers, it begins to evolve, and thereby loses its constructed status over time. For example, Modern Hebrew was modelled on Biblical Hebrew rather than engineered from scratch, and has undergone considerable change in modern Israel.

Justifications for using constructed languages

Proponents of particular constructed languages often have many reasons for using them.

Among these, the famous but disputed Sapir-Whorf hypothesis is often cited; this claims that the language one speaks influences the way in which one thinks. Thus, a "better" language should allow the speaker to reach some elevated level of intelligence, or to encompass more diverse points of view.

The conlanger community

In the CONLANG mailing list, an online community of conlangers has developed, which has its own customs, such as the conlang relay game.

History

Grammatical speculation is documented from Classical Antiquity, with Plato's Cratylus. However the suggested mechanisms of grammar were designed to explain existing languages (Latin, Greek, Sanskrit), and not aiming at constructing new grammars. Roughly contemporary to Plato, in his descriptive grammar of Sanskrit, Pāṇini constructed a meta-linguistic formalism, so that the text of his grammar may be considered a mixture of natural and constructed language.

The earliest recorded conlangs

The earliest non-natural languages were not so much considered "constructed" as "super-natural" or mystical. The Lingua Ignota, recorded in the 12th century by St Hildegard of Bingen is an example of this, apparently it is a form of private mystical cant. Kabbalistic grammatical speculation was directed at recovering the original language spoken by Adam and Eve in Paradise, lost in the confusion of tongues.

The first Christian project for an ideal language is outlined in Dante Alighieri's De vulgari eloquentia, where he searches for the ideal Italian vernacular suited for literature. Raymond Lull's Ars magna was a project of a perfect language with which the infidels could be convinced of the truth of the Christian faith. It was basically an application of combinatorics on a given set of concepts.

During the Renaissance, Lullian and Kabbalistic ideas were carried ad absurdum in a magical context, resulting in cryptographic applications. The Voynich manuscript may be an example of this. Renaissance interest in ancient Egypt, notably the discovery of the Hieroglyphica of Horapollo, and first encounters with the Chinese script directed efforts towards a perfect language of written characters.

Johannes Trithemius, in his works Steganographia and Polygraphia, attempted to show how all languages can be reduced to one. In the 17th century, interest in magical languages was continued by the Rosicrucians and alchemists (like John Dee).

Jakob Boehme in 1623 spoke of a "natural language" (Natursprache) of the senses.

Musical Languages

Musical languages from the Renaissance were tied up with mysticism, magic and alchemy, sometimes also referred to as the language of the birds.

The Solresol project of 1817 re-invented the concept in a more pragmatic context.

The advent of Loglangs

The 17th century also saw the rise of projects for "philosophical" or "a priori" languages.

Pioneered by Francis Lodwick's A Common Writing (1647) and The Groundwork or Foundation laid (or So Intended) for the Framing of a New Perfect Language and a Universal Common Writing (1652), George Dalgarno (Ars signorum, 1661) and John Wilkins (Essay towards a Real Character, and a Philosophical Language, 1668) produced systems of hierarchical classification that were intended to result in both spoken and written expression. Gottfried Leibniz with lingua generalis in 1678 pursued a similar end, aiming at a lexicon of characters upon which the user might perform calculations that would yield true propositions automatically, as a side-effect developing binary calculus.

These projects were not only occupied with reducing or modelling grammar, but also with the arrangement of all human knowledge into "characters" or hierarchies, an idea that with the Enlightenment would ultimately lead to the Encyclopédie.

Leibniz and the encyclopedists realized that it is impossible to organize human knowledge unequivocally in a tree diagram, and consequently to construct an a priori language based on such a classification of concepts. Under the entry Charactère, D'Alembert critically reviewed the projects of philosophical languages of the preceding century.

From the Encyclopédie, projects for a priori languages became more and more extreme. Individual authors, typically unaware of the history of the idea, continued to propose taxonomic philosophical languages until the early 20th century (e.g. Ro), but most recent engineered languages have had more modest goals; some are limited to a specific field, like mathematical formalism or calculus (e.g. Lincos and computer programming languages), others are designed for eliminating syntactical ambiguity (e.g., Loglan and Lojban) or maximizing conciseness (e.g., Ithkuil).

A Posteriori Languages

Already in the Encyclopédie attention began to focus on a posteriori auxiliary languages. Joachim Faiguet in the article on Langue already wrote a short proposition of a "laconic" or regularized grammar of French.

During the 19th century, a bewildering variety of such International Auxiliary Languages were proposed, so that Louis Couturat and Leopold Leau in Historire de la langue universelle (1903) could review 38 projects.

Volapük, Esperanto and Loglan

The first of these that made any international impact was Volapük, proposed in 1879 by Johann Martin Schleyer, and within a decade, 283 Volapükist clubs were counted all over the globe. However, this language by its very success lost its unity, and within a few years, fell into obscurity, making way for Esperanto, proposed in 1887 by Ludwik Lejzer Zamenhof, the most successful IAL to date.

Loglan (1955) and its descendants constitute a pragmatic return to the aims of the a priori languages, tempered by the requirement of usability of an auxiliary language.

Artlangs in Fiction

Artistic languages, constructed for literary enjoyment or aesthetic reasons without any claim of pragmatic usefulness, begin to appear in early modern literature (in Gargantua and Pantagruel, and in utopian contexts), but they only seem to gain notability as serious projects from the 20th century.

  • A Princess of Mars by Edgar Rice Burroughs was possibly the first fiction of the 20th century to feature a constructed language.
  • J. R. R. Tolkien was the first to develop a family of related fictional languages and was the first academic to publicly discuss artistic languages, admitting to A Secret Vice of his in 1930 at an Esperanto congress.
  • George Orwell's Newspeak takes the ideas of language planning, centralized government and thought control by the State to their extremes.

By the turn of the 21st century, it had become common for science-fiction and fantasy works set in other worlds to feature constructed languages, and constructed languages are a regular part of movies of the genre, including Star Wars, Star Trek, etr.

References

  • Alan Libert, A Priori Artificial Languages. Lincom Europa, Munich, 2000. ISBN 3-89586-667-9
  • Umberto Eco, The search for the perfect language, 1993.

Scholarship

Real life classes on conlangs

Communities

How to

Link collections

Collections of constructed language resource links


This article incorporates text from Wikipedia, and is available under the GNU Free Documentation License.
For the original article please see the "external links" section.

Retrieved from "http://www.frathwiki.com/index.php?title=Constructed_language&oldid=108333"