Talk:Quetch: Difference between revisions
From FrathWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(New page: If you are going for speed, I think you should make the phoneme inventory more normal and settle for 1-syllable morphemes instead of 1-phoneme morphemes. They'll be a lot easier to pronou...) |
WeepingElf (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
If you are going for speed, I think you should make the phoneme inventory more normal and settle for 1-syllable morphemes instead of 1-phoneme morphemes. They'll be a lot easier to pronounce, and therefore faster. If, however, your primary goal is to have an actual 1-phoneme-per-morpheme language, then by all means go ahead, I'd like to see what you come up with :) [[User:Soap|Soap]] 09:08, 23 May 2007 (PDT) | If you are going for speed, I think you should make the phoneme inventory more normal and settle for 1-syllable morphemes instead of 1-phoneme morphemes. They'll be a lot easier to pronounce, and therefore faster. If, however, your primary goal is to have an actual 1-phoneme-per-morpheme language, then by all means go ahead, I'd like to see what you come up with :) [[User:Soap|Soap]] 09:08, 23 May 2007 (PDT) | ||
: Sure. But I wish to test the proposition of [[Speedtalk]]. Indeed, I expect the brevity of the morphemes to be cancelled out by the need to express many things other languages have roots for by means of multi-member compounds. --[[User:WeepingElf|WeepingElf]] 13:37, 22 April 2013 (PDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 13:37, 22 April 2013
If you are going for speed, I think you should make the phoneme inventory more normal and settle for 1-syllable morphemes instead of 1-phoneme morphemes. They'll be a lot easier to pronounce, and therefore faster. If, however, your primary goal is to have an actual 1-phoneme-per-morpheme language, then by all means go ahead, I'd like to see what you come up with :) Soap 09:08, 23 May 2007 (PDT)
- Sure. But I wish to test the proposition of Speedtalk. Indeed, I expect the brevity of the morphemes to be cancelled out by the need to express many things other languages have roots for by means of multi-member compounds. --WeepingElf 13:37, 22 April 2013 (PDT)
