Talk:Templates for using web fonts: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
Just my two worthless coins! [[User:Melroch|BPJ]] ([[User talk:Melroch|talk]]) 08:17, 13 March 2014 (PDT) | Just my two worthless coins! [[User:Melroch|BPJ]] ([[User talk:Melroch|talk]]) 08:17, 13 March 2014 (PDT) | ||
-------------------- | |||
The webfont template doesn't work at all. | The webfont template doesn't work at all. | ||
[[User:Ahzoh|Ahzoh]] ([[User talk:Ahzoh|talk]]) 14:22, 22 April 2021 (PDT) | [[User:Ahzoh|Ahzoh]] ([[User talk:Ahzoh|talk]]) 14:22, 22 April 2021 (PDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 13:23, 22 April 2021
About the webfont template:
Is it even legal HTML to have a <style> element inside the <body> element? I guess it's OK if it works but if it's against the specs it may not work or stop working in some browser or other.
Is it not the case anymore that you need to provide different webfont formats for different platforms?
Note that using the font name as class name won't work if the font name contains spaces. Might be a good idea to provide a class parameter.
About the conscript template:
Why not positional parameters so that it can be used with less typing? It's unlikely to acquire more features anyway!
Just my two worthless coins! BPJ (talk) 08:17, 13 March 2014 (PDT)
The webfont template doesn't work at all. Ahzoh (talk) 14:22, 22 April 2021 (PDT)
