Béu : Chapter 3 : The Noun: Difference between revisions

From FrathWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with "== ..... The 4 verb forms== === ... The infinitive verb form=== .. The infinitive is called the '''hipe''' The most common multi-syllable verbs end in "a". The less commo...")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
== ..... The 4 verb forms==
== ..... Some fundamentals of the grammar==
 
=== ... The infinitive verb form===


..
..


The infinitive is called the '''hipe'''
This is an ergative language. The ergative marker is -'''s''' or -'''os'''  ? for words ending in a vowel or '''''' for a multi-word NP.


The most common multi-syllable verbs end in "a".
In the main clause there is free word order. That is, you can have SV, VS, AVO, AOV, VAO, OVA, OAV or VOA<sup>*


The less common multi-syllable verbs end in "e" or "o".
The choices VAO/VOA and AOV/OAV are made on discourse grounds.


The least common multi-syllable verbs end in "au", "oi", "eu" or "ai".
The other choices are made according to the definiteness of  the S, A and O arguments.


To form a negative infinitive the word '''jù''' is placed immediately in front of the verb. For example ...
If definite they come before the verb, if not they come after.


'''doika''' = to walk
Note ...  '''é''' and '''è''' also code for indefiniteness ... OK they are useful for oblique NP and subclauses ... when they appear with S, A or O arguments in a main clauses they impart the notion that the argument is unknown to the speaker as well (or at least that the speaker has limited interest in the argument).


'''jù doika''' = to not walk
<sup>*</sup> Actually in a piece of discourse, it is most likely that the S or A argument are old information and probably the topic. When this is the case they are dropped and instead of the 8 sentence types shown above, we have only the 3 sentence types, V(s), O V(a) and V(a) O where V(s) represents a verb marked for the person/number of the S argument and V(a) represents a verb marked for the person/number of the A argument.


The infinitive can be regarded as a noun.
== ..... Noun phrases==


..
..


=== ... The indicative verb form===
There are 4 types of noun phrase in '''béu''' ...


..
..


The indicative is called the '''hukəpe'''
1) The noun phrase for countable nouns


Note ... the symbol for "r" is called '''huka'''. The word '''hukəpe''' actually means "R-form". "r"-form. By the way, '''mepe''' = form, shape
2) The noun phrase for uncountable nouns


Now we introduce the indicative form of the verb.
3) The noun phrase for pronouns


This form of the verb is built up from the infinitive.
4) The noun phrase for verbs


But first we should introduce a new letter.
5) The noun phrase for places


..
..


[[Image:TW_191.png]]
From now on I will not be talking about "noun phrase", but will be using the '''béu''' term '''fandaunyo'''.


..
'''fandau''' = noun<sup>*</sup>


This letter has not been mentioned so far because it doesn't occur in any words as such. It only occurs in the R-form of the verb.
'''fandauza'''<sup>**</sup> = "a noun phrase"


So if you hear "r" or see the above symbol, you know you are hearing the main verb of a clause.
'''fandaunyo'''<sup>***</sup> = "a noun or a noun phrase"


1) First the final vowel is deleted.  
<sup>*</sup>The usual word building process would give '''fanyədau''' (from '''nandau''' "word" and '''fanyo''' "thing/object"). However in this particular word, there has been a further contraction to '''fandau'''.


2) Then one of the 7 vowels below is added. These show person and number.
<sup>**</sup> the suffix -'''za''', is a suffix used to give the meaning "something more complicated than the basic word".


[[Image:TW_109.png]]
<sup>***</sup> the suffix -'''nyo''', is a suffix used to give the meaning "something more complicated than the basic word OR the basic word''.


Notice that there are 2 entries that represent the 1st person plural subject (i.e. we). The top one represents first person inclusive and the bottom one represents first person exclusive. 
..


Note that the '''ai''' form is used when you are talking about generalities ... the so called "impersonal form" ... English uses "you" or "one" for this function. 
=== ... The countable nouns fandauza===


The above defines the "person" of the verb. Then follows an "r" which indicates the word is an verb in the indicative mood. For example ...
..
 
'''doika''' = to walk


'''doikar''' = I walk
It can consist of ... (1) the emphatic particle ... (2) a specifier '''koiʒi''' ... (3) a number ... (4) the head '''hua''' ... (5) adjectives '''saidau''' ... (6) a determiner ... (7) a question word ... (8) a relative clause.  Only the head is mandatory.


'''doikir''' = you walk
Actually there are quite a few restrictions. For example (7) would never occurs with (8)    .... mmmh why did I insert "would" here ??


etc. etc. etc.
Many restrictions between (2) and (3)


..
..


==== .. Tense====
==== .. The question words====


..
..


In '''béu''' tense is usually shown not on the verb but is indicated by an adverb of time. This adverb can come anywhere in a clause but it has a strong tendency to come clause initial.
The set of possible question word (within a NP) is very small. Only three ... '''nái''' "which", '''láu''' "how much" or "how many", '''kái''' "what kind of".


YESTERDAY = yesterday I cleaned my car
..


THE DAY BEFORE YESTERDAY = the day before yesterday I cleaned my car
==== .. The determiners====


'''??''' = I clean my car ... taken as a habitual in this case
..


TOMORROW = tomorrow I will clean my car
The set of possible determiners is very small. Only two ... '''''' "this", or '''''' "that".
 
The words '''taiku''' meaning the past can be used instead of yesterday, the day before yesterday etc etc ??. This construction is equivalent to a past tense.
 
The words '''jauku''' meaning the future can simply be substituted for tomorrow ??. This construction is equivalent to a future tense.
 
To indicate the future, if the subject is human, often the word INTEND ??? is used. For example ... ??
 
There is one tense, it is the present tense which is shown by adding an "a". For example ...
 
'''doikara''' = I am walking


..
..


==== .. Aspect====
==== .. The adjectives====


..
..


The perfect aspect is shown by adding an "i". For example ...
Not much to say about this one, you can string together as many as you like ... the same as in English. Also genitives are put in this slot. A genitive is a word derived from a noun by the suffixing of -'''n''' (or -'''on''') which indicates possession<sup>*</sup>. Genitives always come after the regular adjective.


'''doikari''' = I have walked
<sup>*</sup>Actually it can also stand for a location ... where the NP is at.
 
The ending "u" can be considered the opposite of the above aspect. Lets call it the "not yet" aspect. For example ...
 
'''doikaru''' = I have not yet walked / I have not walked
 
The -'''ra''' is only used for actions happening at the time of speaking. In English, the "to be - ing" construction is used for this. However the English "to be - ing" construction
is also used to fit one action inside another. For example "she came in when I was shaving" ... usually set in the past but in the future is also possible. This is called the imperfect aspect (I think). In '''béu''' you use the copula plus the infinitive with the -'''n''' '''pilana''' affixed. For example ...
 
'''por kyu tar''' SHAVE'''n'''
 
Note ... SHAVE'''n''' is similar to an adjective in that it follows the copula. However it differs from an adjective in an important way ... it can never be an attribute of a noun. The form SHAVE'''ana''' is the noun attribute.
 
...............XXX colour light green ................................
 
Note ... When you have the endings -'''ora''', -'''ori''' and -'''oru''' they are always shortened to just -'''ra''', -'''ri''' and -'''ru''', provided the final consonant of the infinitive is not '''w y h''' or '''ʔ'''. For example ...
 
'''doikri''' = he has walked
...............XXX colour light green ................................


..
..


==== .. Negativeness====
==== .. The head====


..
..


The indicative mood is negativized by adding '''ju'''. For example ...
This is usually a noun. However it can also be an adjective. When it is an adjective it has concrete reference instead of representing a quality (as happens often in English). For instance, when talking about ... say ... a photograph, you could say "the green is too dark". In this sentence "the green" is a NP meaning the quality of being green. In '''béu''' if green is used as the head of a NP it always means "the green one" : "the person/thing that is green".  


'''doikarju''' = I do not walk
In '''béu''', '''geunai''' would be used in a sentence such as "the green is too dark".


The present tense is negativized as above but with addition of the word '''kyu.i''' ( meaning "now"). For example ...
'''gèu''' = "green" or "the green one"


'''doikarju kyu.i''' = I am not walking
'''geumai''' = "greenness"


Note - the "u" aspect can be considered the negative of the "i" aspect and vice versa.
'''saco''' = "slow" or "the slow one"


..
'''saconi''' = "slowness"


==== .. Probability====
Notice that the suffix has two forms ... depending upon whether the base adjective has one syllable or more than one syllable.


..
Sometimes the head is a determiner. In these cases the NP is understood to refer to some noun ... but it is not spoken ... it is just understood by all parties. In these cases the determiners undergo a change of form ...


There are two adverbs '''màs''' and '''lói'''.
'''''' =>  '''adi''' = "this one"


As with all adverbs they can be placed almost anywhere in a sentence. However these two have a strong preference to be sentence initial.
'''dè'''  =>  '''ade''' = "that one"


'''màs doikori''' = maybe he has walked
'''nái''' =>  '''anai''' = "which one"


'''lói doikori''' = probably he has walked
Related to '''''' and '''dè''' are the two nouns '''dían''' (here) and '''dèn''' (there). Although nouns, they never occur with the locative case or the ergative case.
 
You could say that the first one indicates about 50 % certainty while the second indicates around 90 % certainty.


..
..


=== ... The subjunctive verb form===
==== .. The specifiers====


..
..


The subjunctive is called the '''sudəpe'''
The specifiers = '''nandau.a koiʒi''' or just '''koiʒia'''


The subjunctive verb form comprises the same person/number component as the indicative, followed by "s". That is all. For example ...
'''koiʒi''' actually means "preface" as in "the preface to the book"


'''doikos''' = go on, let him walk.
It also means forewarning or harbinger ... as in "that slight tremor on Tuesday night, was '''koizi''' of the quake on Friday"


The usage of the '''béu''' subjunctive covers the same functions as the Swahili subjunctive.
Immediately before the core you can have a specifier.


The negative subjunctive is formed by adding '''ke'''. For example ...
There consist of the following ...
 
'''doikoske''' = best not to let him walk.


..
..


=== ... The imperative verb form===
'''kyà''' = no, '''í''' = any, '''é''' = some(for singular noun), '''yú''' = every, '''è''' = some(for plural nouns), '''nò''' = plural, '''ù''' = all, '''auva''' => '''ataitauta''' = 2=>1727, '''uwe''' = many, '''iyo''' = few, '''ege''' = more, '''ozo''' = less.


..
..


The imperative is called the '''yeməpe'''
Notice that the specifier that implies zero number has low tone, the 3 specifiers that imply singular* number have high tone and the 3 specifiers that imply plural* number have low tone.


This is used for giving orders. When you utter an imperative you do not expect a discussion about the appropriateness of the action  (although a discussion about the best way to perform the action is possible).
.* Well this is true for the English translations anyway. (Side Note ... Actually I am not so sure about the "logic" of my little scheme. Also I would like to look into how a spectrum of other languages use specifiers)


For non-monosyllabic verbs ...
Also note that '''nò''' is a noun (meaning "number") as well as a particle that denotes plurality. In the '''béu''' mathematical tradition, '''nò''' means a number from 2 -> 1727 only (of course there are expressions for expanding the concept to integers, rational numbers etc. etc.)


1) First the final vowel of the infinitive is deleted.
After a '''koiʒi''' the head is always in its base form with regard to number. For example ...


2) Then either -'''iya''' or  -'''eya''' is added. '''iya''' when commanding one person, '''eya''' when commanding more than one person. For example ...
..
 
'''doikiya''' = walk !
 
For monosyllabic verbs ...
 
1) -'''ya''' is added. For example ...
 
'''dó''' = to do


'''doya''' = do it !
'''é glà''' = some woman


The negative imperative is formed by putting the particle '''kyà''' before the infinitive.
'''è glà''' = some women ... not *'''è gala'''


'''kyà doika''' = Don't walk !
'''í toti''' = any child .......... not *'''í totai'''
 
There is no distinction for number in the negative imperative.


..
..


=== ... The consecutive and simultaneous tenses===
The are 4 cases where you can have two '''koiʒi''' together ... '''é nò''' or when you have '''í''' followed by a number greater than one. For example ...


..
..


TO BE PLACED 2 CHAPTERS BEHIND THE ABOVE ARTICLE
'''é nò toti''' = some child or children ... this is a contraction of "'''é toto''' OR '''nò toti'''"


Earlier we mentioned the present tense. There are 2 further tenses in '''béu'''. However they aren't relative to NOW but relative to the last ROGER form verb.
'''í auva toti''' = any two children


The consecutive tense, '''eu''', shows that the action takes place after the time of occurrence of the previous ROGER form verb. For example ...
'''ege auva toti''' = two more children


'''jana doikar moʒi solbeu''' = Yesterday I had a walk and then drank some water
'''ozo auva toti''' = two less children


The simultaneous tense, '''ai''', shows that the action takes place at the same time as the previous ROGER form verb. For example ...
..


'''jana doikar moʒi solbeu''' = Yesterday I walked about a bit while drinking water
==== .. Specifiers X determiners====
 
Note ... verbs with these endings, even tho', they are in indicative mood, actually have the mood of the initial verb ???


..
..


== ..... 5 short verb==
Below is a table showing all the specifiers plus a countable noun plus the proximal determiner "this".  


..
..


In a previous lesson we saw that the first step for making an indicative, subjunctive or imperative verb form is to delete the final vowel from the infinitive. However this is only applicable for multi-syllabe words.  
{| border=1
  |align=center|  1
  |align=left| '''ù báu dí'''
  |align=left| all of these men OR all these men
  |-
  |align=center| 2
  |align=left| '''uwe báu dí'''
  |align=left| many of these men
  |-
  |align=center| 3
  |align=left| '''iyo báu dí'''
  |align=left| few of these men OR a few of these men
  |-
  |align=center| 4
  |align=left| '''auva báu dí'''
  |align=left| two of these men => '''ataitauta báu dí''' ... 1727 of these men
  |-
  |align=center| 5
  |align=left| '''kyà báu dí'''
  |align=left| none of these men
  |-
  |align=center| 6
  |align=left| '''í báu dí'''
  |align=left| any of these men OR any one of these men
  |-
  |align=center| 7
  |align=left| '''é báu dí'''
  |align=left| one of these men
  |-
  |align=center| - 8 -
  |align=left| '''è báu dí'''
  |align=left| some of these men
  |-
  |align=center| 9
  |align=left| '''yú báu dí'''
  |align=left| every one of these men
  |-
  |align=center| 10
  |align=left| '''nò báu dí'''
  |align=left| several of these men OR several of these men here
  |-
  |align=center| 11
  |align=left| '''é nò báu dí'''
  |align=left| one or more of these men
  |-
  |align=center| 12
  |align=left| '''í auva báu dí''' ...
  |align=left| any 2 of these men =>  '''í ataitauta báu dí''' ... any 1727 of these men 
  |}


With monosyllabic verbs the rules are different.
..


For a monosyllabic verbs the indicative endings and subjunctive suffixes are simply added on at the end of the infinitive. For example ...
The above table is worth discussing ... for what it tells us about English as much as anything else.


'''swó''' = to fear  ... '''swo.ar''' = I fear ... '''swo.ir''' = you fear ... '''swo.or''' = she fears ... '''swo.uske''' = lest they fear ...... etc.
..


The imperative suffix is -'''ya''' for singular and plural. For example ...
One line 1 ... I do not know why "all these men" is acceptable ... on every other line "of" is needed (to think about)


'''swo.ya''' = fear !
Similarly on line 3 ... I do not know why "a few" is a valid alternative.


For a monosyllabic verb ending in '''ai''' or  '''oi''', the final '''i''' => '''y''' for the indicative and subjunctive. For example ...
Notice that *'''aja báu dí''' does not exist. It is illegal. "one of these men" is expressed on line 7. '''aja''' only used in counting ???


'''gái''' = to ache, to be in pain ... '''gayar''' = I am in pain ... '''gayir''' = you are in pain ... etc. etc.
I should think more on the semantic difference between line 10 and line 8. ???


For a monosyllabic verb ending in '''au''' or  '''eu''', the final '''u''' => '''w''' for the indicative and subjunctive. For example ...
line 1 and line 9 are interesting. Every language has a word corresponding to "every" (or "each", same same) and a word corresponding to "all". Especially when the NP is S or A, "all" emphasises the unity of the action, while "every" emphasises the separateness of the actions. Now of course (maybe in most cases) this dichotomy is not needed. It seems to me, that in that case, English uses "every" as the default case (the Scandinavian languages use "all" as the default ??? ). In '''béu''' the default is "all" '''ù'''.


'''ʔáu''' = to take, to pick up ... '''ʔawar''' = I take ... '''ʔauya''' = take !
On line 9, it seems that "one" adds emphasis to the "every". Probably, not so long ago, "every" was valid by itself. The meaning of this word (in English anyway) seems particularly prone to picking up other elements (for the sake of emphasis) with a corresponding lost of power for the basic word when it occurs alone. (From Etymonline EVERY = early 13c., contraction of Old English æfre ælc "each of a group," literally "ever each" (Chaucer's everich), from each with ever added for emphasis. The word still is felt to want emphasis; as in Modern English every last ..., every single ..., etc.)


'''dàu''' = to arrive
..


'''cái''' = to depart
This table is also valid for the distal determiner "that". For the third determiner ("which") the table is much truncated ...


..
..


== ..... 37 short verbs==
{|
  |align=center| 1
  |align=center| '''nò báu nái'''
  |align=left| which men
  |-
  |align=center| 2
  |align=center| ... '''auva báu nái'''
  |align=center| which two men => '''ataitauta báu nái''' which 1727 of these men
  |}


..
..


However for the 37 monosyllabic verbs listed below the rules are different. Their vowels are completely deleted for the indicative and subjunctive verb forms. For example ...
Below I have reproduced the above two tables for when the noun is dropped (but understood as background information). It is quite trivial to generate the below tables. Apart from lines 8 and 10, just delete "men" from the English phrase and '''báu''' from the '''béu''' phrase. (I must think about why 8 and 10 are different ???)


..


'''myàr gì''' = I love you ........................ not * '''mye.ar gì'''
{| border=1
 
   |align=center| 1
'''pòr nambo''' = he enters the house ... not *'''poi.or nambo'''
   |align=left| '''ù dí'''
 
   |align=left| all of these OR all these
 
{| border=1
   |align=center| '''ʔái''' = to want
  |align=center|
  |align=center|
  |align=center|
  |-
  |align=center| '''mài''' = to get
  |align=center| '''myè''' = to like, to love
  |align=center|
   |align=center|
  |-
  |align=center| '''yái''' = to have
   |align=center|  
  |align=center|
  |align=center|
  |-
  |align=center| '''jòi''' = to go
  |align=center|
  |align=center|
  |align=center| '''jwèu''' = to suffice, to be enough
   |-
   |-
   |align=center| '''fà''' = to know
   |align=center| 2
   |align=center| '''fyá''' = to tell
   |align=left| '''uwe dí'''
  |align=center| '''flò''' = to eat
   |align=left| many of these
   |align=center|  
   |-
   |-
   |align=center| '''bái''' = to ascend
   |align=center| 3
  |align=center| '''byó''' = to be able to
   |align=left| '''iyo dí'''
   |align=center| '''blèu''' = to hold
   |align=left| few of these OR a few of these
   |align=center| '''bwá''' = to exit
   |-
   |-
   |align=center| '''gàu''' = to descend
   |align=center| 4
   |align=center|
   |align=left| '''auva dí'''
  |align=center| '''glà''' = to store
   |align=left| 2 of these => '''ataitauta dí''' ... 1727 of these
   |align=center| '''gwói''' = to pass
  |-
  |align=center| '''''' = to do
  |align=center|
  |align=center|
  |align=center| '''dwé''' = to come
  |-
  |align=center| '''lái''' = to change
  |align=center|
  |align=center|
  |align=center|
   |-
   |-
   |align=center| '''cài''' = to use
   |align=center| 5
  |align=center|
   |align=left| '''kyà dí'''
  |align=center|
  |align=left| none of these
   |align=center| '''cwá''' = to cross
   |-
   |-
   |align=center| '''sàu''' = to be
   |align=center| 6
   |align=center|
   |align=left| '''í dí'''
  |align=center| '''slè''' = to be under weak obligation
   |align=left| any of these OR any one of these
   |align=center| '''swé''' = to speak, to say
   |-
   |-
   |align=center| '''kó''' = to see
   |align=center| 7
  |align=center| '''kyò''' = to show
   |align=left| '''é dí'''
   |align=center| '''klói''' = to think
   |align=left| one of these
   |align=center| '''kwèu''' = to turn
   |-
   |-
   |align=center| '''pòi''' = to enter
   |align=center| - 8 -
   |align=center| '''pyói''' = to be under strong obligation
   |align=left| '''è dí'''
  |align=center| '''plèu''' = to follow
   |align=left| some of these OR several of these
   |align=center|  
   |-
   |-
   |align=center| '''tèu''' = to put
   |align=center| 9
  |align=center|
   |align=left| '''yú dí'''
  |align=center|
  |align=left| every one of these
   |align=center| '''twé''' = to meet
   |-
   |-
   |align=center| '''wàu''' = to lack
   |align=center| 10
  |align=center|
  |align=left| '''nò dí'''
  |align=center|
   |align=left| these NOT several of these
   |align=center|  
   |-
   |-
   |align=center| '''nàu''' = to give
   |align=center| 11
   |align=center| '''nyáu''' = to return
   |align=left| '''é nò dí'''
  |align=center|
   |align=left| one or more of these
   |align=center|  
   |-
   |-
   |align=center| '''háu''' = to be good
   |align=center| 12
   |align=center|
  |align=left| '''í auva dí''' ...
  |align=center|
   |align=left| any 2 of these =>  '''í ataitauta dí''' ... any 1727 of these 
  |align=center|
   |}
   |}
The imperative suffix is -'''ya''' for singular and plural. For example ...
'''pà nauya''' = give me
'''baiya''' = go up
Some nouns related to the above ... '''yaivan''' = possessions, property, '''flovan''' = food, '''dovan''' = products, '''nauvan''' = gifts, '''glavan''' = reserves, '''dó''' = things that must be done, '''dwái''' = deeds, acts, actions, behaviour.
A particle related to the above ... '''yú''' ... a particle that indicates possession, occurs after the "possessed" and before the "possessor.


..
..


== ..... The copula==
{|
  |align=center| 1
  |align=center| '''nò nái'''
  |align=left| which ones
  |-
  |align=center| 2
  |align=center| ... '''auva nái'''
  |align=center| which two => '''ataitauta nái''' which 1727
  |}


..
..


There is one copula in '''beuba'''.
In the last section we introduced the rule, that when a determiner is the head, then the determiner changes form (an '''a''' is prefixed to it)
 
Its infinitive is '''sàu'''. Following the method of other verbs, its negative is '''jù sàu'''.
 
The indicative mood is derived from the infinitive in the usual method. So ...
 
'''sàr''' = I am
 
'''ʃìr''' = you are
 
'''sòr''' = he/she/it is
 
etc. etc.etc.
 
The negative is formed be suffixing -'''ke'''. For example ...
 
'''sorke''' = he/she/it is not
 
Actually the (present tense, positive) copula is usually dropped if there is no chance of a misunderstanding.
 
It is mostly used for emphasis; like when you are refuting a claim
 
Person A) ...  '''ʃirke moltai''' = You aren't a doctor
 
Person b) ...  '''sàr moltai''' = I AM a doctor
 
Another situation where the (present tense, positive) copula tends to be used is when either the subject or the copula complement are longish trains of words.  For example ...
 
'''solbua alkyo ʔá dori sùr sawoi''' = Those alcoholic drinks that she has made are delicious.
 
Unlike the other verbs, the copula has a different form for the past tense and a different form for the future tense. These are ...
 
'''tàr''' = I was
 
'''jàr''' = I will be
 
'''jarke''' = I won't be
 
etc. etc.etc.


(You could say that '''taiku sàr''' => '''tàr''' and '''jauku sàr''' => '''jàr''')
Now we must introduce an exception to that rule ... when you have a specifier just to the left of a determiner (in this conjunction, the determiner MUST be the head) the determiner takes its original form.
 
The forms ‘’’sor’’’ and ‘’’sur’’’ are invariably shortened to simply -‘’’r’’’ and stuck on to the end of the copula subject. ........................................XXX colour light green ................................
 
Similarly the forms ‘’’sorke’’’ and ‘’’surke’’’ are invariably shortened to simply -‘’’rke’’’ and stuck on to the end of the copula subject. ...............XXX colour light green ................................
 
Note ... In copular sentences there is not free word order. They must be "copula subject" followed by "copula" followed by "object". Copula subject does not take the ergative suffix -'''s'''.
 
The subjunctive forms are ...
 
'''sas''' and '''saske''' ... uses ???
 
There are only two imperative forms ... '''jiya''' and '''jeya'''
 
-----
 
In a later chapter ...
 
'''tari''' = I was already
 
'''taru''' = I was not yet
 
'''sari''' = I am already
 
'''saru''' = I am not yet
 
'''jari''' = I will be already
 
'''jaru''' = I will not yet be
 
------
 
There are 2 more words that might be considered copulaa ...
 
1) '''twài''' = to be located, to be placed .... perhaps an eroded form of a participle of '''tèu''' "to place"
 
2) '''yór''' = to exist ... a third person indicative form of the verb '''yái''' "to have". The third person indicative meaning is completely bleached in this usage.


..
..


== ..... Verb Chains==
==== .. The emphatic particle====


..
..


When 2 (or more) actions are considered inextricably tangled up in each other, '''béu''' forms a verb chain.
Now even before the specifiers it is possible to have an element. This is the emphatic particle '''á'''.
 
In a verb chain, usually the "most surprising" (i.e. the verb that conveys the most information) comes first and takes the normal ending (i.e.  infinitive, indicative, subjunctive or imperative). If all the verbs in the verb chain are contiguous, then the remaining verbs are in the infinitive form. However if the non-final verbs in a chain are separated from the main verb, then it takes a different form. This form is called the '''iape'''. For the '''iape''' delete the final verb of the infinitive and add -'''ia''' for monosyllables and -'''i''' for non-monosyllables.
 
Verb chain rules ...
 
1) When two (or more) infinitives come together, they are considered verb chains.
 
2) A verb chain can only have one subject. <sup>*<sup>


3) When one verb is separated from the first one(s) it must take the special "chain" form.
This is also used as a sort of vocative case. Not really obligatory but used before a persons name when you are trying o get their attention.


4) Always the initial verb, takes the indicative, subjunctive and imperative verb forms, thus setting the mood for the entire chain. The following verbs are ...
When this particle comes directly in front of '''adi''', '''ade''' and '''anai''' an amalgamation takes place ( '''á adi''' etc etc are in fact illegal)


if following the initial verb =>  infinitives ... '''hipe'''
'''á adi'''  =>  '''ádí''' = "this one!"


if separated from the initial verb => '''iape'''
'''á ade'''  => '''ádé''' = "that one!"


For example ...
'''á anai'''  =>  '''ánái''' = "which one!"


'''joske pòi nambo''' = let's not let him go into the house ... there are 2 verbs in this chain ... '''jòi''' and '''pòi'''
These three words break the rule that only monosyllabic words can have tone. These 3 words are the only exception to that rule.


'''jaŋkora bwá nambo dwía''' = he is running out the house (towards us) ... there are 3 verbs in this chain ... '''jaŋka''', '''bwá''' and '''dwé'''
By the way, emphasis is always used when contrasting two things. as in "this is wet, but that is dry" = '''ádí nucoi, ádé mideu'''


'''doikaya gàu pòi nambo jìa''' = Walk (command) down into the house (we are in the house) ... there are 4 verbs in this chain ... '''doika''', '''gàu''', '''pòi''' and '''jòi'''
When written using the '''béu''' writing system, only the initial '''a''' is given the dot on the RHS which indicates high tone. The second syllable is unmarked.
 
Extensive use is made of serial verb constructions (SVC's). You can spot a SVC when you have a verb immediately followed (i.e. no pause and no particle) by another verb. Usually a SVC has two verbs but occasionally you will come across one with three verbs.
 
<sup>*<sup>Well maybe not always. For example '''jompa gàu''' means "rub down" or "erode". Now this can be a transitive verb or an intransitive verb. For example ...
 
1) The river erodes the stone
 
2) The stone erodes
 
With the transitive situation, the "river" is in no way going down, it is the stone. Cases where one of the verbs in a verb chain can have a different subject are limited to verbs such as erode (at least I think that now ??). Also the verbal noun for '''jompa gàu''' is not formed in the usual way for word building. Erosion = '''gaujompa'''
 
-----
 
'''gaujompa''' or '''gajompa''' a verb in its own right ... I suppose that this would happen given time ??
 
I work as a translator ??? ... I work '''sàu''' translator ??
 
"want" ... "intend" ... etc. etc. are never part of verb chains ??


..
..


=== .. Balanced===
==== .. The relative clause====


..
..


For example ...
'''béu''' relative clauses work pretty much the same as English relative clauses.  
 
1) YESTERDAY FISH CATCH'''ur poʔi  flìa''' = Yesterday they caught some fish, cooked the fish and then ate the fish.
 
2) ALL AFTERNOON '''kludari''' REPORT  ANSWER'''i''' PHONE = All afternoon I was writing reports and answering the telephone.
 
3) ALL EVENING '''solbair'''  CHAMPAIGN '''flìa''' CAVIAR = All day we were drinking champaign and eating caviar.
 
The internal time structure of the chain must be worked out from knowledge of the situation described. The above sentences have the following time frames ...


1) The actions were probably one after the other. That is some catching occurred, followed by some cooking followed by some eating.
'''báu à glà timpori''' = the man whom the woman hit


2) The actions here are not simultaneous but interspersed randomly throughout the afternoon.
'''báu às glà timpori''' = the man who hit the woman


3) The actions here could be interspersed randomly, but also could be overlapping somewhat.
The relativizer is '''à''' or '''às'''. '''à''' if the NP has an S or O role within the relative clause ... '''às''' if the NP has an A role within the relative clause ... '''béu''' being an ergative language.


..
..


=== .. Unbalanced===
=== ... The uncountable noun fandauza===


..
..


Now all the above were examples of "one off" or "balanced" verb chains ( "balanced" in the sense that all the verbs have about the same likelihood ). A more common type of verb chain is one in which some common verb is appended to a clause to give some extra information. Examples of these verbs are ... "enter", "exit", "cross", "follow", "to go through", "come", "go", etc. etc. etc.
It can consist of ... (1) "the holder" ... (2) the head '''hua''' ... (3) adjectives '''saidau''' ... (4) a determiner '''didedau'''. Only the head is mandatory.


..
'''auva hoŋko ʔazwo pona dí''' = two cups of this hot milk


==== . enter and exit====
Note ... even though we have no word "of" ... there is no ambiguity. If the above was two '''fandaunyo''', there would either be a pause between '''hoŋko''' and '''ʔazwo''' (for example if one was A and one was the O argument), or they would be separated by "and" '''wí''' if they were separate '''fandaunyo''' but comprised only one argument.


..
In this respect '''béu''' takes after Indonesian. For example ... five big bags of this black rice = lima tas besar beras hitam ini (literally ... five bag big rice black this)


When in verb chains, these 2 verbs tend to be the main verb. They are used where "into" and "out of" are used in English.
Note that the "holder ???" can be a complete countable noun '''fandaunyo''' in itself.


'''pòi''' = to enter
lima tas besar beras hitam ini


'''bwá''' = to exit
(5 bag big) (rice black this)  .... Usually languages have a linker, particular when the phrases are long. For example Chinese "de", English "of", Japanese "no". '''béu''' has no linker (similar to Indonesian) ... (however '''à''' or '''fí''' could be pressed into service if needed ??? )


'''nambo bwá dwé''' = to come out of the house
(SideNote) ... '''ʔazwe''' = to suck ... '''ʔazweye''' = to suckle, to offer the breast


'''nambo pòi jòi''' = to go into the house
..


'''nambo pòi dwé''' = to come into the house
=== ... The pronoun fandauza===
 
'''nambo bwá jòi''' = to go out of the house
 
'''bwá nambo día''' = to come out of a house
 
'''pòi nambo jìa''' = to go into a house
 
'''pòi nambo día''' = to come into a house
 
'''bwá nambo jìa''' = to go out of a house
 
'''nambo bwá jaŋka dwé''' = to run out the house (towards us)
 
'''bwá nambo jaŋki dwía''' = to run out a house (towards us)


..
..


==== . across & along & through====
Below the forms of the '''béu''' pronouns are the given for when the pronoun represent the S or O argument. This form can be considered the "base form" or the "unmarked form".  


..
..


When in verb chains, these 3 verbs tend to be the main verb.
{| border=1
 
  |align=center| me
'''kwèu''' = to cross, to go/come over
  |align=center| ''''''
 
  |align=center| us
'''plèu''' = to follow, to go/come along
  |align=center| '''yùa'''
 
  |-
'''cwá''' = to go/come through
  |align=center|
 
  |align=center|
ROAD '''kwèu''' = to cross the road
  |align=center| us
 
  |align=center| '''wìa'''
ROAD '''kwèu doika''' = to walk across the road
  |-
 
  |align=center| you
'''kwèu''' ROAD '''doiki''' = to walk across a road
  |align=center| ''''''
 
  |align=center| you (plural)
'''kwèu''' ROAD '''doiki dwía''' = to walk across a road (towards the speaker)
  |align=center| ''''''
 
  |-
'''plèw''' and '''cwá''' follow the same pattern
  |align=center| him, her
 
  |align=center| '''ò'''
Note ... some postpositions
  |align=center| them
 
  |align=center| ''''''
road '''kwai''' = across the road = across a road
  |-
 
  |align=center| it
'''pintu cwai''' = through the door = along a road
  |align=center| '''ʃì'''
 
  |align=center| them
Above are 2 postpositions ... derived from the participles '''kwewai''' and '''cwawai'''
  |align=center| '''ʃì'''
 
    |}
ROAD '''plewai''' = along the road


..
..


==== . come and go====
When they are used as an S arguments (i.e. with an intransitive verb), it might be better to translate these pronouns  as "I myself", "you yourself" etc. etc.


..
..


When in verb chains, these 2 verbs tend to be the auxiliary verb.
There is another pronoun but this one only occurs as an O argument. When a action is performed by somebody or something on themselves we use '''''' to represent the O argument.
 
Obviously they often occur as simple verbs.
 
"come", "go", "up" and "down" are often stuck on to the end of an utterance ... like a sort of afterthought. They give the utterance a
bit more clarity ... a bit more resolution.
 
The below is nothing to do with verb chains, just a bit to do with the usage of '''dwé''' and '''jòi'''.


Just as in English, we do not say "*I hit me", but "I hit myself" ... in '''béu''' we do not say '''*pás pà timpari''', but '''pás tí timpari'''.
..
..


HERE------------>--------LONDON               
Below is a table with '''nù''' "they" occurring with the allowed specifiers. '''yùa''', '''wìa''', '''jè''' and '''ʃì''' pattern in a similar way.


'''londonye jòi''' = to go to London ... however if the destination immediately follows '''jòi''' -'''ye''' is dropped<sup>*</sup>. So ...    
{|
  |align=center| 1
  |align=center| '''í nù'''
  |align=left| any of them
  |-
  |align=center| 2
  |align=center| '''é nù'''
  |align=center| one of them
  |-
  |align=center| 3
  |align=center| '''yú nù'''
  |align=center| every one of them
  |-
  |align=center| 4
  |align=center| '''è nù'''
  |align=left| some of them
  |-
  |align=center| 5
  |align=center| '''kyà nù'''
  |align=center| none of them
  |-
  |align=center| 6
  |align=center| '''ù nù'''
  |align=center| all of them
  |-
  |align=center| 7
  |align=center| '''kyà nù'''
  |align=center| none of them
  |-
  |align=center| 8
  |align=center| '''í auva nù'''
  |align=center| any two of them
  |-
  |align=center| 9
  |align=center| '''ege nù'''
  |align=center| more of them
  |-
  |align=center| 10
  |align=center| '''ozo nù'''
  |align=center| less of them
   |}


SIMILAR TO ADVERBS + GIVE ... LIGHT GREEN HI-LIGHT
Nothing really surprising in the above. However I thought that I should lay it out in black and white. (what about '''emo''' "the most" and '''omo''' "the least" ??)
 
'''jòi london''' = to go to London
 
'''jòi twè jono''' = to go to meet John
 
<sup>*</sup> In contradistinction, when a origin comes immediately after the verb '''dwé''' "to come" the '''pilana''' '''-fi''' is never dropped.


..
..


HERE----------<---------LONDON
Because the person and number of the A or S argument is expressed in the actual verb. The above are usually dropped (however the third person pronoun is occasionally retained to give the distinction between human and non-human subject) so when the pronouns above are come across, it might be better to translate them as "I myself", "you yourself" etc. etc.
                 
'''dwé londonfi''' = to come from London


'''dwé  jonovi''' = to come from John


..
It is a rule that '''tí''' must follow the A argument (if it is overtly expressed ... i.e. by a free-standing pronoun and not just in the verb)


==== . ascend and descend====
LINGUISTIC JARGON ... "myself" is what is called a "reflexive pronoun". In English there are many reflexive pronouns (i.e. "myself", "yourself", "herself", etc. etc.) : in '''béu''' only one.


..
..


When in verb chains, these 2 verbs tend to be the auxiliary verb. They are used where "up" and "down" are used in English.
'''bía''' = to ascend


'''gùa''' = to descend


CLIMB '''ʔupai gìa''' = to climb down a tree
Below the form of the '''béu''' pronouns is the given for when the pronoun is the A argument.
 
'''ʔupai''' CLIMB '''gìa''' = to climb down the tree
 
CLIMB '''ʔupai bía''' = to climb up a tree
 
THROW '''toili gìa'''  = to throw down a book
 
These are also often inserted in verb chains to give extra information. The usually precede "come" and "go" when "come" and "go" are auxiliary verbs in the chain.
 
'''jòi gàu pòi nambo''' = to go down into the house
 
'''jaŋkora gàu pòi nambo jìa''' = he is running down into the house (away from us)
 
'''jaŋkora pòi nambo gìa dwía''' = he is running down into the house (towards us)
 
The two above sentences could describe the exact same event. However there is some slight connotation in the latter that the descending happened at the same time as the entering (i.e. the entrance of the house was sloping ... somewhat unusual)


..
..


==== . here and there====
{| border=1
  |align=center| I
  |align=center| '''pás'''
  |align=center| we  (includes "you")
  |align=center| '''yúas'''
  |-
  |align=center|
  |align=center|
  |align=center| we (doesn't include "you")
  |align=center| '''wías'''
  |-
  |align=center| you
  |align=center| '''gís'''
  |align=center| you (plural)
  |align=center| '''jés'''
  |-
  |align=center| he, she
  |align=center| '''ós'''
  |align=center| they
  |align=center| '''nús'''
  |-
  |align=center| it
  |align=center| '''ʃís'''
  |align=center| they
  |align=center| '''ʃís'''
    |}


..
..


'''awata''' = to wonder
=== ... The sandaunyo===
 
'''jaŋka awata''' = to run around
 
..
 
==== . bring and take====


..
..


'''kizu''' = a knife
The '''sandaunyo''' is similar to the '''fandaunyo''' but built around a '''sandau''' as opposed to a '''fandau'''.


'''kizu ʔáu jòi''' = to take the knife away
'''sandau''' = a verbal noun, an infinitive, a maSdar .... whatever you want to call it. Ultimately derived from the word '''sanyo''' which means "an event". ('''fanyo''' and '''sanyo''' are equivalent to the Japanese "mono" and "koto"). The word for "verb" is '''jaudau'''. Of course there is a one to one relationship between the '''jaudau''' and the '''sandau''' (as in English if you have an infinitive verb form, you are of course going to have a corresponding finite verb form).


'''kizu ʔáu dwé''' = to bring the knife
In the '''sandaunyo''' there are fixed word orders. They are VS and VAO. If there are any adverbs or locatives they follow the S or the O. For example ...
 
'''ʔáu kizu jìa''' = to take a knife away
 
'''kizu ʔauya jòi nàu jono''' = take the knife and go give to John
 
'''kizu ʔauya dwé nàu jono''' = bring the knife and give to John
 
 
If however the knife was already in the 2nd person's hand, you would say ...
 
 
'''dweya nàu jono kizu''' = come and give john the knife ... or ...
 
'''dweya nàu kizu jonoye''' = come and give the knife to john
 
Note ... the rules governing the 3 participants in a "giving", are exactly the same as English. Even to the fact that if you drop the participant you must include '''jowe''' which means away. For example ...
 
'''nari klogau tí jowe''' = I gave my shoes away.
 
Note ... In arithmetic '''ʔaujoi''' mean "to subtract" or "subtraction" : '''ledo''' means "to add" or "addition".
 
Note ... when somebody gives something "to themselves", '''tiye''' = must always be used, no matter its position.


..
..


==== . for and against====
'''somwo pà''' = "my sleep"


..
'''timpa báu glà''' = the man's hitting of the woman ... Note that '''báu''' does not have the ergative suffix -'''s'''


HELP = to help, assist, support
'''solbe pà moze pona sacowe rì kéu''' = My drinking the cold water quickly was bad


'''gompa''' = to hinder, to be against, to oppose
'''timpwa glà''' = the woman being struck ... Note ... to form an passive, you infix '''w'''.


FIGHT = to fight
'''solbwe moze rì kéu''' = The drinking of the water was bad
 
FIGHT '''jonotu''' = to fight with john ......... john is present and fighting
 
FIGHT HELP ''' jono''' = to fight for John ... john is present but maybe not fighting
 
FIGHT '''jonoji''' = to fight for John ...........probably john not fighting and not present
 
FIGHT '''gompa jono''' = to fight against John


..
..


==== . to change====
== ..... The '''hipeza'''==


..
..


'''lái''' = to change
A '''hipeza''' could be translated as "infinitive phrase"


'''kwèu''' = to turn
Now a '''hipe''' is a type of nouns. So when determiners etc. etc. are added on they must conform to the rules for regular NP's.


'''lái sàu''' = to change into, to become
However they differ in that they never take plurals and are never possessed (that is followed by '''''' ).


'''kwèu sàu''' = to turn into
A '''hipeza''' is any phrase with a '''hipe''' at its heart.


The above 2 mean exactly the same
Now on occasion S, O and A arguments must appear in a '''hipeza'''.


Note ...
'''béu''' is quite strict on how these arguments can be added.


paint'''ori pintu nelau''' = he has painted a blue door
They must all follow the infinitive.


paint'''ori pintu ʃìa nelau''' = he has painted a door blue
1) If in the indicative or subjunctive, an argument takes the ergative affix '''s''', in the infinitive, while having no affix, must be preceded by '''hí'''.


..
2) The O argument always comes before the A argument.


??? How does this mesh in with clauses starting with "want", "intend", "plan" etc. etc. ... SEE THAT BOOK BY DIXON ??
3) Other argument relating to time, place and manner come after the S, O and A arguments.


??? How does this mesh in with the concepts ...
----------


"start", "stop", "to bodge", "to no affect", "scatter", "hurry", "to do accidentally" etc.etc. ... SEE THAT BOOK ON DYIRBAL BY DIXON
English has quite a number of different ways of including S, O and A arguments with the infinitive. See below ...


..
1) Attila's destruction of Rome


==..... Numbers==
2) Rome's destruction (by Attila)


..
3) The destruction of Rome (by Attila)


'''béu''' uses base 12.
-----
 
..
 
{| border=1
  |align=right| one =
  |align=left| '''aja'''
  |align=right| 10<sub>12</sub> =
  |align=left| '''ajau'''
  |align=right| 100<sub>12</sub> =
  |align=left| '''ajai'''
  |-
  |align=right| two =
  |align=left|  '''auva'''
  |align=right| 20<sub>12</sub> =
  |align=left| '''uvau'''
  |align=right| 200<sub>12</sub> =
  |align=left| '''uvai'''
  |-
  |align=right| three =
  |align=left| '''aiba'''
  |align=right| 30<sub>12</sub> =
  |align=left| '''ibau'''
  |align=right| 300<sub>12</sub> =
  |align=left| '''ibai'''
  |-
  |align=right| four =
  |align=left| '''uga'''
  |align=right| 40<sub>12</sub> =
  |align=left| '''ugau'''
  |align=right| 400<sub>12</sub> =
  |align=left| '''agai'''
  |-
  |align=right| five =
  |align=left| '''ida'''
  |align=right| 50<sub>12</sub> =
  |align=left| '''idau'''
  |align=right| 500<sub>12</sub> =
  |align=left| '''idai'''
  |-
  |align=right| six =
  |align=left| '''ela'''
  |align=right| 60<sub>12</sub> =
  |align=left| '''ulau'''
  |align=right| 600<sub>12</sub> =
  |align=left| '''ulai'''
  |-
  |align=right| seven =
  |align=left|  '''oica'''
  |align=right| 70<sub>12</sub> =
  |align=left| '''icau'''
  |align=right| 700<sub>12</sub> =
  |align=left| '''icai'''
  |-
  |align=right| eight =
  |align=left| '''eza'''
  |align=right| 80<sub>12</sub> =
  |align=left| '''ezau'''
  |align=right| 800<sub>12</sub> =
  |align=left| '''ezai'''
  |-
  |align=right| nine =
  |align=left| '''oka'''
  |align=right| 90<sub>12</sub> =
  |align=left| '''okau'''
  |align=right| 900<sub>12</sub> =
  |align=left| '''okai'''
  |-
  |align=right| ten =
  |align=left| '''iapa'''
  |align=right| 10x12 =
  |align=left| '''apau'''
  |align=right| 10x12x12 =
  |align=left| '''apai'''
  |-
  |align=right| eleven =
  |align=left| '''uata'''
  |align=right| ............. 11x12 =
  |align=left| '''atau'''
  |align=right| ............. 11x12x12 =
  |align=left| '''atai'''
  |}


 
Tie in the participle phrase (equivalent to Dixon's complement clause) ???
You will noticed that 12 numbers over eleven have been shortened. For example the "regular" form for 20 would be  '''auvau''', but this is actually '''uvau'''.
 
Also the number 6, '''ela''' has been shortened. This would have been '''eula''' if everything was perfectly regular.
 
In the above table, 10 is actually, of course 12 : 90 is (9x12)+0 => 108 etc. etc.
 
The numbers in the above table combine, to express every number from 1 -> 1727 in one word. For example ;-


..
..


{| border=1
== ..... Arithmetic==
  |align=center| 543<sub>12</sub>
  |align=center| '''idaigauba'''
  |-
  |align=center| 503<sub>12</sub>
  |align=center| '''idaiba'''
  |-
  |align=center| 640<sub>12</sub>
  |align=center| '''ulaigau'''
  |-
  |align=center| 72<sub>12</sub>
  |align=center|  '''icauva'''
  |-
  |align=center| 6<sub>12</sub>
  |align=center| '''ela'''
  |}


..
..


The above explains about the pronunciation of the numbers. But how are they written.
'''noiga''' = arithmetic


In fact the numbers are never written out in full. See below for the characters corresponding to the five numbers above.
[[Image:TW_215.png]]


..


[[Image:TW_210.png]]
In the above table you can see how the symbol for the numbers 1 to 11 are derived. In the first column are how the numbers are pronounced in '''béu'''. In the second column is the symbol used for the single consonant which exists in the heart of every number. In the third column you can see how this consonant is modified slightly to produce the symbol used for each number. All these number symbols have a "number bar" extending from the top of the symbol towards the right. Only the first number in a string will have this "number bar".  


..
On the left you can see how the symbols for the numbers -1 to -11 are derived. As you can see for the negative numbers there is a number bar extending from from the top of the symbol towards the left.


It can be seen that all the vowels are dropped and there is a horizontal line inserted in the top right of the character. The symbol for '''h''' is used for inserting zeroes (although never pronounced).
Notice that the forms for 1, 6, 7 and 9 have been modified slightly before the "number bar" has been added.


If you had a leading zero you would use the word  '''jù''' which is usually placed before nouns and means "space/empty/zero/no". 007 would be '''jù jù oica''' (three words)
[[Image:TW_216.png]]


To deal with a telephone number, you would lump the numbers in threes (any leading zero or zeroes by themselves though) and outspeak the numbers. If you were left with a single digit (say 4) it would be pronounced '''agai'''. If you were to pronounce it '''uga''', it would of course mean 004. Also you would probably add the particle '''''' at the end. This means "exactly" (or it can mean the speaker has finished outspeaking the number)
Above you can see some interesting symbols. These are used to extend the range of the '''béu''' number system (remember the basic system only covers 1-> 1727).


..
Also there are to special symbols that mean "exactly" and "approximately" these are often appended to a number string.


To get an fractional number (regarded as specifiers ... as all numbers are) you just attach '''s-''' to the front of the cardinal number. So we have ;-
To give you an idea of how they are used, I have given you a very big number below.


..
[[Image:TW_214.png]]


{| border=1
'''aja huŋgu uvaila nàin ezaitauba wúa idauja omba idaizaupa yanfa elaibau mulu idaidauka ʔiwetu elaivau dù'''
  |align=center| a unit
  |align=center| '''saja'''  
  |-
  |align=center| a half
  |align=center| '''sauva'''
  |-
  |align=center| a third
  |align=center| '''saiba'''
  |-
  |align=center| a quarter
  |align=center|  '''sida'''
  |-
  |align=center| etc.
  |align=center| etc.
  |}


..
Which is  => 1,206,8E3,051.58T,630,559,62 ... E represents eleven and T represents ten ... remember the number is in base 12.


May be this form originally came from an amalgamation of ??? plus the number.
O.K. this number has a ridiculous dynamic range. But this is for demonstration purposes only ... if you can handle this number you can handle any number.  


These are fully numbers. They are written in the same way as numbers, except the have a squiggle above them. The squiggle looks like an "8" on its side that hasn't fully closed.
Now the 7 "placeholders"<sup>*</sup> are not really thought of as real numbers, they are markers only. Used in the same way that we would say "point" or "decimal" when reeling off a number.  


..
One further point of note ...


To get an ordinal number (regarded as adjectives) you just attach '''n-''' to the front of the cardinal number. So we have ;-
If you wanted to express a number represented by digits 2->4 from the LHS of the monster, you would say '''auvaidaula nàin''' .... the same way as we have in the Western European tradition.
However if you wanted to express a number represented digits 6 ->8 from the RHS of the monster, you would say '''yanfa elaibau'''  .... not the way we do it.  This is like saying "milli 630 volts" instead of "630 microvolts".


..
[[Image:TW_211.png]]


{| border=1
In the table above is shown the method for writing imaginary numbers and fractions.
  |align=center| first
  |align=center| '''naja'''
  |-
  |align=center| second
  |align=center| '''nauva'''
  |-
  |align=center| third
  |align=center| '''naiba'''
  |-
  |align=center| fourth
  |align=center|  '''nida'''
  |-
  |align=center| etc.
  |align=center| etc.
  |}


..
Also the method of laying out the 4 basic arithmetic operations are shown.


May be this form originally came from an amalgamation of '''nò''' plus the number.
A number can be made imaginary by adding a further stroke that touches the "number bar". And to get a fraction, you add a stroke just above the number. This stroke looks a bit like a small "8" on its side.


These forms are adjectives 100% and are always written out in full.
Notice that there is a special sign to indicate addition ('''+'''), and also a special sign for equality ('''=>''').


..
As you can see above, there is no special sign for the multiplication or division operation. The numbers are simply written one beside the other.


To get (I don't know what these are called) (regarded as a noun) you just attach '''b-''' to the front of the cardinal number. So we have ;-
Division is the same as multiplication except that the denominator is in "fractional form".


..
-6 is pronounced '''komo ela''' ... '''komo''' meaning left or negative.


{| border=1
By the way '''bene''' means right (as in right-hand-side) or positive.
  |align=center| alone, single
  |align=center| '''baja'''
  |-
  |align=center| a double, a twosome, a duality
  |align=center| '''bauva'''
  |-  
  |align=center| a threesome, a trinity
  |align=center| '''baiba'''
  |-
  |align=center| a foursome, a quartet
  |align=center|  '''bida'''
  |-
  |align=center| etc.
  |align=center| etc.
  |}


..
4i is pronounced '''uga haspia'''<sup>**</sup> ... and what does '''haspia''' mean, well it is the name of the little squiggle that touches the number bar, for one thing.


Note '''bajai''' = lonely
-4i is pronounced '''komo uga haspia'''


..
-1/10 is pronounced '''komo diapa'''


May be this form originally came from an amalgamation of '''mebo''' plus the number.
i/4 is pronounced '''duga haspia'''


..
<sup>*</sup>Actually these placeholder symbols are named after 6 living things. This does not lead to confusion tho'. When you are doing arithmetic these concrete meanings are totally bleached.


And so ends chapter 1 ...
<sup>**</sup>This can also be pronounced as '''bene uga haspia'''. However usually the '''bene''' bit is deemed redundent.


..
..


== ..... Index==
== ... Index==


{{Béu Index}}
{{Béu Index}}

Revision as of 01:11, 12 January 2015

..... Some fundamentals of the grammar

..

This is an ergative language. The ergative marker is -s or -os  ? for words ending in a vowel or for a multi-word NP.

In the main clause there is free word order. That is, you can have SV, VS, AVO, AOV, VAO, OVA, OAV or VOA*

The choices VAO/VOA and AOV/OAV are made on discourse grounds.

The other choices are made according to the definiteness of the S, A and O arguments.

If definite they come before the verb, if not they come after.

Note ... é and è also code for indefiniteness ... OK they are useful for oblique NP and subclauses ... when they appear with S, A or O arguments in a main clauses they impart the notion that the argument is unknown to the speaker as well (or at least that the speaker has limited interest in the argument).

* Actually in a piece of discourse, it is most likely that the S or A argument are old information and probably the topic. When this is the case they are dropped and instead of the 8 sentence types shown above, we have only the 3 sentence types, V(s), O V(a) and V(a) O where V(s) represents a verb marked for the person/number of the S argument and V(a) represents a verb marked for the person/number of the A argument.

..... Noun phrases

..

There are 4 types of noun phrase in béu ...

..

1) The noun phrase for countable nouns

2) The noun phrase for uncountable nouns

3) The noun phrase for pronouns

4) The noun phrase for verbs

5) The noun phrase for places

..

From now on I will not be talking about "noun phrase", but will be using the béu term fandaunyo.

fandau = noun*

fandauza** = "a noun phrase"

fandaunyo*** = "a noun or a noun phrase"

*The usual word building process would give fanyədau (from nandau "word" and fanyo "thing/object"). However in this particular word, there has been a further contraction to fandau.

** the suffix -za, is a suffix used to give the meaning "something more complicated than the basic word".

*** the suffix -nyo, is a suffix used to give the meaning "something more complicated than the basic word OR the basic word.

..

... The countable nouns fandauza

..

It can consist of ... (1) the emphatic particle ... (2) a specifier koiʒi ... (3) a number ... (4) the head hua ... (5) adjectives saidau ... (6) a determiner ... (7) a question word ... (8) a relative clause. Only the head is mandatory.

Actually there are quite a few restrictions. For example (7) would never occurs with (8) .... mmmh why did I insert "would" here ??

Many restrictions between (2) and (3)

..

.. The question words

..

The set of possible question word (within a NP) is very small. Only three ... nái "which", láu "how much" or "how many", kái "what kind of".

..

.. The determiners

..

The set of possible determiners is very small. Only two ... "this", or "that".

..

.. The adjectives

..

Not much to say about this one, you can string together as many as you like ... the same as in English. Also genitives are put in this slot. A genitive is a word derived from a noun by the suffixing of -n (or -on) which indicates possession*. Genitives always come after the regular adjective.

*Actually it can also stand for a location ... where the NP is at.

..

.. The head

..

This is usually a noun. However it can also be an adjective. When it is an adjective it has concrete reference instead of representing a quality (as happens often in English). For instance, when talking about ... say ... a photograph, you could say "the green is too dark". In this sentence "the green" is a NP meaning the quality of being green. In béu if green is used as the head of a NP it always means "the green one" : "the person/thing that is green".

In béu, geunai would be used in a sentence such as "the green is too dark".

gèu = "green" or "the green one"

geumai = "greenness"

saco = "slow" or "the slow one"

saconi = "slowness"

Notice that the suffix has two forms ... depending upon whether the base adjective has one syllable or more than one syllable.

Sometimes the head is a determiner. In these cases the NP is understood to refer to some noun ... but it is not spoken ... it is just understood by all parties. In these cases the determiners undergo a change of form ...

=> adi = "this one"

=> ade = "that one"

nái => anai = "which one"

Related to and are the two nouns dían (here) and dèn (there). Although nouns, they never occur with the locative case or the ergative case.

..

.. The specifiers

..

The specifiers = nandau.a koiʒi or just koiʒia

koiʒi actually means "preface" as in "the preface to the book"

It also means forewarning or harbinger ... as in "that slight tremor on Tuesday night, was koizi of the quake on Friday"

Immediately before the core you can have a specifier.

There consist of the following ...

..

kyà = no, í = any, é = some(for singular noun), = every, è = some(for plural nouns), = plural, ù = all, auva => ataitauta = 2=>1727, uwe = many, iyo = few, ege = more, ozo = less.

..

Notice that the specifier that implies zero number has low tone, the 3 specifiers that imply singular* number have high tone and the 3 specifiers that imply plural* number have low tone.

.* Well this is true for the English translations anyway. (Side Note ... Actually I am not so sure about the "logic" of my little scheme. Also I would like to look into how a spectrum of other languages use specifiers)

Also note that is a noun (meaning "number") as well as a particle that denotes plurality. In the béu mathematical tradition, means a number from 2 -> 1727 only (of course there are expressions for expanding the concept to integers, rational numbers etc. etc.)

After a koiʒi the head is always in its base form with regard to number. For example ...

..

é glà = some woman

è glà = some women ... not *è gala

í toti = any child .......... not *í totai

..

The are 4 cases where you can have two koiʒi together ... é nò or when you have í followed by a number greater than one. For example ...

..

é nò toti = some child or children ... this is a contraction of "é toto OR nò toti"

í auva toti = any two children

ege auva toti = two more children

ozo auva toti = two less children

..

.. Specifiers X determiners

..

Below is a table showing all the specifiers plus a countable noun plus the proximal determiner "this".

..

1 ù báu dí all of these men OR all these men
2 uwe báu dí many of these men
3 iyo báu dí few of these men OR a few of these men
4 auva báu dí two of these men => ataitauta báu dí ... 1727 of these men
5 kyà báu dí none of these men
6 í báu dí any of these men OR any one of these men
7 é báu dí one of these men
- 8 - è báu dí some of these men
9 yú báu dí every one of these men
10 nò báu dí several of these men OR several of these men here
11 é nò báu dí one or more of these men
12 í auva báu dí ... any 2 of these men => í ataitauta báu dí ... any 1727 of these men

..

The above table is worth discussing ... for what it tells us about English as much as anything else.

..

One line 1 ... I do not know why "all these men" is acceptable ... on every other line "of" is needed (to think about)

Similarly on line 3 ... I do not know why "a few" is a valid alternative.

Notice that *aja báu dí does not exist. It is illegal. "one of these men" is expressed on line 7. aja only used in counting ???

I should think more on the semantic difference between line 10 and line 8. ???

line 1 and line 9 are interesting. Every language has a word corresponding to "every" (or "each", same same) and a word corresponding to "all". Especially when the NP is S or A, "all" emphasises the unity of the action, while "every" emphasises the separateness of the actions. Now of course (maybe in most cases) this dichotomy is not needed. It seems to me, that in that case, English uses "every" as the default case (the Scandinavian languages use "all" as the default ??? ). In béu the default is "all" ù.

On line 9, it seems that "one" adds emphasis to the "every". Probably, not so long ago, "every" was valid by itself. The meaning of this word (in English anyway) seems particularly prone to picking up other elements (for the sake of emphasis) with a corresponding lost of power for the basic word when it occurs alone. (From Etymonline EVERY = early 13c., contraction of Old English æfre ælc "each of a group," literally "ever each" (Chaucer's everich), from each with ever added for emphasis. The word still is felt to want emphasis; as in Modern English every last ..., every single ..., etc.)

..

This table is also valid for the distal determiner "that". For the third determiner ("which") the table is much truncated ...

..

1 nò báu nái which men
2 ... auva báu nái which two men => ataitauta báu nái which 1727 of these men

..

Below I have reproduced the above two tables for when the noun is dropped (but understood as background information). It is quite trivial to generate the below tables. Apart from lines 8 and 10, just delete "men" from the English phrase and báu from the béu phrase. (I must think about why 8 and 10 are different ???)

..

1 ù dí all of these OR all these
2 uwe dí many of these
3 iyo dí few of these OR a few of these
4 auva dí 2 of these => ataitauta dí ... 1727 of these
5 kyà dí none of these
6 í dí any of these OR any one of these
7 é dí one of these
- 8 - è dí some of these OR several of these
9 yú dí every one of these
10 nò dí these NOT several of these
11 é nò dí one or more of these
12 í auva dí ... any 2 of these => í ataitauta dí ... any 1727 of these

..

1 nò nái which ones
2 ... auva nái which two => ataitauta nái which 1727

..

In the last section we introduced the rule, that when a determiner is the head, then the determiner changes form (an a is prefixed to it)

Now we must introduce an exception to that rule ... when you have a specifier just to the left of a determiner (in this conjunction, the determiner MUST be the head) the determiner takes its original form.

..

.. The emphatic particle

..

Now even before the specifiers it is possible to have an element. This is the emphatic particle á.

This is also used as a sort of vocative case. Not really obligatory but used before a persons name when you are trying o get their attention.

When this particle comes directly in front of adi, ade and anai an amalgamation takes place ( á adi etc etc are in fact illegal)

á adi => ádí = "this one!"

á ade => ádé = "that one!"

á anai => ánái = "which one!"

These three words break the rule that only monosyllabic words can have tone. These 3 words are the only exception to that rule.

By the way, emphasis is always used when contrasting two things. as in "this is wet, but that is dry" = ádí nucoi, ádé mideu

When written using the béu writing system, only the initial a is given the dot on the RHS which indicates high tone. The second syllable is unmarked.

..

.. The relative clause

..

béu relative clauses work pretty much the same as English relative clauses.

báu à glà timpori = the man whom the woman hit

báu às glà timpori = the man who hit the woman

The relativizer is à or às. à if the NP has an S or O role within the relative clause ... às if the NP has an A role within the relative clause ... béu being an ergative language.

..

... The uncountable noun fandauza

..

It can consist of ... (1) "the holder" ... (2) the head hua ... (3) adjectives saidau ... (4) a determiner didedau. Only the head is mandatory.

auva hoŋko ʔazwo pona dí = two cups of this hot milk

Note ... even though we have no word "of" ... there is no ambiguity. If the above was two fandaunyo, there would either be a pause between hoŋko and ʔazwo (for example if one was A and one was the O argument), or they would be separated by "and" if they were separate fandaunyo but comprised only one argument.

In this respect béu takes after Indonesian. For example ... five big bags of this black rice = lima tas besar beras hitam ini (literally ... five bag big rice black this)

Note that the "holder ???" can be a complete countable noun fandaunyo in itself.

lima tas besar beras hitam ini

(5 bag big) (rice black this) .... Usually languages have a linker, particular when the phrases are long. For example Chinese "de", English "of", Japanese "no". béu has no linker (similar to Indonesian) ... (however à or could be pressed into service if needed ??? )

(SideNote) ... ʔazwe = to suck ... ʔazweye = to suckle, to offer the breast

..

... The pronoun fandauza

..

Below the forms of the béu pronouns are the given for when the pronoun represent the S or O argument. This form can be considered the "base form" or the "unmarked form".

..

me us yùa
us wìa
you you (plural)
him, her ò them
it ʃì them ʃì

..

When they are used as an S arguments (i.e. with an intransitive verb), it might be better to translate these pronouns as "I myself", "you yourself" etc. etc.

..

There is another pronoun but this one only occurs as an O argument. When a action is performed by somebody or something on themselves we use to represent the O argument.

Just as in English, we do not say "*I hit me", but "I hit myself" ... in béu we do not say *pás pà timpari, but pás tí timpari. ..

Below is a table with "they" occurring with the allowed specifiers. yùa, wìa, and ʃì pattern in a similar way.

1 í nù any of them
2 é nù one of them
3 yú nù every one of them
4 è nù some of them
5 kyà nù none of them
6 ù nù all of them
7 kyà nù none of them
8 í auva nù any two of them
9 ege nù more of them
10 ozo nù less of them

Nothing really surprising in the above. However I thought that I should lay it out in black and white. (what about emo "the most" and omo "the least" ??)

..

Because the person and number of the A or S argument is expressed in the actual verb. The above are usually dropped (however the third person pronoun is occasionally retained to give the distinction between human and non-human subject) so when the pronouns above are come across, it might be better to translate them as "I myself", "you yourself" etc. etc.


It is a rule that must follow the A argument (if it is overtly expressed ... i.e. by a free-standing pronoun and not just in the verb)

LINGUISTIC JARGON ... "myself" is what is called a "reflexive pronoun". In English there are many reflexive pronouns (i.e. "myself", "yourself", "herself", etc. etc.) : in béu only one.

..


Below the form of the béu pronouns is the given for when the pronoun is the A argument.

..

I pás we (includes "you") yúas
we (doesn't include "you") wías
you gís you (plural) jés
he, she ós they nús
it ʃís they ʃís

..

... The sandaunyo

..

The sandaunyo is similar to the fandaunyo but built around a sandau as opposed to a fandau.

sandau = a verbal noun, an infinitive, a maSdar .... whatever you want to call it. Ultimately derived from the word sanyo which means "an event". (fanyo and sanyo are equivalent to the Japanese "mono" and "koto"). The word for "verb" is jaudau. Of course there is a one to one relationship between the jaudau and the sandau (as in English if you have an infinitive verb form, you are of course going to have a corresponding finite verb form).

In the sandaunyo there are fixed word orders. They are VS and VAO. If there are any adverbs or locatives they follow the S or the O. For example ...

..

somwo pà = "my sleep"

timpa báu glà = the man's hitting of the woman ... Note that báu does not have the ergative suffix -s

solbe pà moze pona sacowe rì kéu = My drinking the cold water quickly was bad

timpwa glà = the woman being struck ... Note ... to form an passive, you infix w.

solbwe moze rì kéu = The drinking of the water was bad

..

..... The hipeza

..

A hipeza could be translated as "infinitive phrase"

Now a hipe is a type of nouns. So when determiners etc. etc. are added on they must conform to the rules for regular NP's.

However they differ in that they never take plurals and are never possessed (that is followed by ).

A hipeza is any phrase with a hipe at its heart.

Now on occasion S, O and A arguments must appear in a hipeza.

béu is quite strict on how these arguments can be added.

They must all follow the infinitive.

1) If in the indicative or subjunctive, an argument takes the ergative affix s, in the infinitive, while having no affix, must be preceded by .

2) The O argument always comes before the A argument.

3) Other argument relating to time, place and manner come after the S, O and A arguments.


English has quite a number of different ways of including S, O and A arguments with the infinitive. See below ...

1) Attila's destruction of Rome

2) Rome's destruction (by Attila)

3) The destruction of Rome (by Attila)


Tie in the participle phrase (equivalent to Dixon's complement clause)  ???

..

..... Arithmetic

..

noiga = arithmetic

TW 215.png


In the above table you can see how the symbol for the numbers 1 to 11 are derived. In the first column are how the numbers are pronounced in béu. In the second column is the symbol used for the single consonant which exists in the heart of every number. In the third column you can see how this consonant is modified slightly to produce the symbol used for each number. All these number symbols have a "number bar" extending from the top of the symbol towards the right. Only the first number in a string will have this "number bar".

On the left you can see how the symbols for the numbers -1 to -11 are derived. As you can see for the negative numbers there is a number bar extending from from the top of the symbol towards the left.

Notice that the forms for 1, 6, 7 and 9 have been modified slightly before the "number bar" has been added.

TW 216.png

Above you can see some interesting symbols. These are used to extend the range of the béu number system (remember the basic system only covers 1-> 1727).

Also there are to special symbols that mean "exactly" and "approximately" these are often appended to a number string.

To give you an idea of how they are used, I have given you a very big number below.

TW 214.png

aja huŋgu uvaila nàin ezaitauba wúa idauja omba idaizaupa yanfa elaibau mulu idaidauka ʔiwetu elaivau dù

Which is => 1,206,8E3,051.58T,630,559,62 ... E represents eleven and T represents ten ... remember the number is in base 12.

O.K. this number has a ridiculous dynamic range. But this is for demonstration purposes only ... if you can handle this number you can handle any number.

Now the 7 "placeholders"* are not really thought of as real numbers, they are markers only. Used in the same way that we would say "point" or "decimal" when reeling off a number.

One further point of note ...

If you wanted to express a number represented by digits 2->4 from the LHS of the monster, you would say auvaidaula nàin .... the same way as we have in the Western European tradition. However if you wanted to express a number represented digits 6 ->8 from the RHS of the monster, you would say yanfa elaibau .... not the way we do it. This is like saying "milli 630 volts" instead of "630 microvolts".

TW 211.png

In the table above is shown the method for writing imaginary numbers and fractions.

Also the method of laying out the 4 basic arithmetic operations are shown.

A number can be made imaginary by adding a further stroke that touches the "number bar". And to get a fraction, you add a stroke just above the number. This stroke looks a bit like a small "8" on its side.

Notice that there is a special sign to indicate addition (+), and also a special sign for equality (=>).

As you can see above, there is no special sign for the multiplication or division operation. The numbers are simply written one beside the other.

Division is the same as multiplication except that the denominator is in "fractional form".

-6 is pronounced komo ela ... komo meaning left or negative.

By the way bene means right (as in right-hand-side) or positive.

4i is pronounced uga haspia** ... and what does haspia mean, well it is the name of the little squiggle that touches the number bar, for one thing.

-4i is pronounced komo uga haspia

-1/10 is pronounced komo diapa

i/4 is pronounced duga haspia

*Actually these placeholder symbols are named after 6 living things. This does not lead to confusion tho'. When you are doing arithmetic these concrete meanings are totally bleached.

**This can also be pronounced as bene uga haspia. However usually the bene bit is deemed redundent.

..

... Index

  1. Introduction to Béu
  2. Béu : Chapter 1 : The Sounds
  3. Béu : Chapter 2 : The Noun
  4. Béu : Chapter 3 : The Verb
  5. Béu : Chapter 4 : Adjective
  6. Béu : Chapter 5 : Questions
  7. Béu : Chapter 6 : Derivations
  8. Béu : Chapter 7 : Way of Life 1
  9. Béu : Chapter 8 : Way of life 2
  10. Béu : Chapter 9 : Word Building
  11. Béu : Chapter 10 : Gerund Phrase
  12. Béu : Discarded Stuff
  13. A statistical explanation for the counter-factual/past-tense conflation in conditional sentences