Talk:Náŋifi Fasúxa: Difference between revisions

From FrathWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Possible Verb Reform - Please Comment)
Line 26: Line 26:
/atmaxi'/ [ad.mɛ.'xi']
/atmaxi'/ [ad.mɛ.'xi']
/na'ŋifi fasu'xa/ ['nɛ'.ŋi.vi fɔ.'so'.γa]
/na'ŋifi fasu'xa/ ['nɛ'.ŋi.vi fɔ.'so'.γa]
==Vowel Patterns==
 
Although Na'ŋifi Fasu'xa appears to have only three vowels, the interactions between them have created unique bivocalic and trivocalic patterns. These are laid out below - the first set of vowel indicates the orthography, the second the pronunciation.
=Diachronic Evolution of Vowels=
Vowel patterns
==Step 1 (Monophthongization)==
Bivocalic:
{{IPA|[ɐi]}} > {{IPA|[e:]}}
a i > ɛ i
{{IPA|[ɐu]}} > {{IPA|[o:]}}
a u > ɔ u
{{IPA|[iɐ]}} > {{IPA|[æ:]}}
i a > e a
{{IPA|[iu]}} > {{IPA|[ʉ:]}}
i i > i i
{{IPA|[uɐ]}} > {{IPA|[ɔ:]}}
i u > i u
{{IPA|[ui]}} > {{IPA|[y:]}}
u a > o a
==Step 2==
u i > u i
{{IPA|[æ:]}} > {{IPA|[ɛ:]}}
u u > u u
==Step 3 (Umlaut)==
Trivocalic:
===a-umlaut===
a a a > a a a
{{IPA|[i]}} > {{IPA|[e]}}/_C{{IPA|[ɐ]}}
a a i > a ɛ i
{{IPA|[u]}} > {{IPA|[o]}}/_C{{IPA|[ɐ]}}
a a u > a ɔ u
{{IPA|[ʉ:]}} > {{IPA|[ɵ]}/_C{{IPA|[ɐ]}}
a i a > ɛ e a
===i-umlaut===
a i i > ɛ i i
{{IPA|[y:]}} > {{IPA|[ø]}}/_C{{IPA|[i]}}
a i u > ɛ i u
{{IPA|[ɐ]}} > {{IPA|[ɛ]}}/_C{{IPA|[i]}}
a u a > ɔ o a
{{IPA|[u]}} > {{IPA|[y]}}/_C{{IPA|[i]}}
a u i > ɔ u i
===u-umlaut===
a u u > ɔ u u
{{IPA|[ɐ]}} > {{IPA|[ɔ]}}/_C{{IPA|[u]}}
i a a > e a a
{{IPA|[i]}} > {{IPA|[ɨ]}}/_C{{IPA|[u]}}
i a i > e ɛ i
===ʉ-umlaut===
i a u > e ɔ u
{{IPA|[ɐ]}} > {{IPA|[ɜ]}}/_C{{IPA|[ʉ]}}
i i a > i e a
===y-umlaut===
i i i > i i i
{{IPA|[ɐ]}} > {{IPA|[œ]}}//_C{{IPA|[y]}}
i i u > i u u
 
u a a > o a a
u a i > o ɛ i
u a u > o ɔ u
u i a > u e a
u i i > u i i
u i u > u i u
u u a > u o a
u u i > u u i
u u u > u u u
Should I add  u i > ɯ i and i u > y u to this mix?
--[[User:LinguarumMagister|LinguarumMagister]] 19:46, 23 August 2012 (PDT)
--[[User:LinguarumMagister|LinguarumMagister]] 19:46, 23 August 2012 (PDT)
=Verb Reform=
=Verb Reform=
Given the limits of NF syllabicity, I figure that I should make it a more efficient engine. So here's the proposed new scheme, eliminating verb-noun agreement (the syllable in caps are stressed)"
Given the limits of NF syllabicity, I figure that I should make it a more efficient engine. So here's the proposed new scheme, eliminating verb-noun agreement (the syllable in caps are stressed)"

Revision as of 13:19, 20 October 2014

I know that the syllable structure and length is a little engelang-ish, but the inherent instability is intentional. There will be a vulgar NF from which the daughter languages will be derived - but I have to finish the standard language first.

8/26: Given Greenberg's Linguistic Universal number 16, perhaps auxiliary verbs before the main verb transform the main verb into an subordinate adverb, thus honoring LU15 and LU16. Any thoughts?

Hmm, that would preserve the basic structure. I like the idea. --LinguarumMagister 18:07, 13 August 2012 (PDT) What about this: NF is verb-initial, but nothing so far suggests that the verbal slot is limited to one verb. The auxiliary verb is going to agree in gender and number with the main verb anyway. --LinguarumMagister 20:02, 23 August 2012 (PDT)

Phonology Revision

Allophones

If Na'ŋifi Fasu'xa had not already possessed an orthography, the phonetic transcription would be quite different. A dearth of phonemes indicates a wealth of allophones. /n/ [n] becomes [l] before a following consonant /antufi/ [ɔl.tu.'fi'] /m/ [m] becomes a homorganic nasal [m], [n], or [ŋ] before a following consonant. /ta'amxi/ ['tɛ':ŋ.hi] /ŋ/ becomes [ʔ] in word-initial position, but remains /ŋ/ elsewhere. /ŋa'sinu/ ['ʔɛ'.zi.nu] /na'ŋifi/ ['nɛ'.ŋi.vi] /x/ [x] becones [h] before or after any consonant except /x/ /xiupxa/ ['hjo'p.ha] Voiceless consonants (i.e., everything except the nasals) becomes voiced following a voiced consonant (i.e., a nasal). /a'tmaxi/ ['a'd.mɛ.γi] Voiceless consonants become voiced between vowels, if they follow the accented syllable. /a'tmaxi/ ['a'd.mɛ.γi] /atmaxi'/ [ad.mɛ.'xi'] /na'ŋifi fasu'xa/ ['nɛ'.ŋi.vi fɔ.'so'.γa]

Diachronic Evolution of Vowels

Step 1 (Monophthongization)

[ɐi] > [e:] [ɐu] > [o:] [iɐ] > [æ:] [iu] > [ʉ:] [uɐ] > [ɔ:] [ui] > [y:]

Step 2

[æ:] > [ɛ:]

Step 3 (Umlaut)

a-umlaut

[i] > [e]/_C[ɐ] [u] > [o]/_C[ɐ] [ʉ:] > {{IPA|[ɵ]}/_C[ɐ]

i-umlaut

[y:] > [ø]/_C[i] [ɐ] > [ɛ]/_C[i] [u] > [y]/_C[i]

u-umlaut

[ɐ] > [ɔ]/_C[u] [i] > [ɨ]/_C[u]

ʉ-umlaut

[ɐ] > [ɜ]/_C[ʉ]

y-umlaut

[ɐ] > [œ]//_C[y]

--LinguarumMagister 19:46, 23 August 2012 (PDT)

Verb Reform

Given the limits of NF syllabicity, I figure that I should make it a more efficient engine. So here's the proposed new scheme, eliminating verb-noun agreement (the syllable in caps are stressed)" Regular: CVcvcv - Active CVvccv - Passive CVcvvc - Reflexive CVvcvc - Recriprocal Causative: cvCVcv - Causative cvVCcv - Intensive cvCVvc - ? cvVCcv - ? Any thoughts? --LinguarumMagister 21:30, 20 October 2012 (PDT)

Retrieved from "http://www.frathwiki.com/index.php?title=Talk:Náŋifi_Fasúxa&oldid=81878"