Talk:Náŋifi Fasúxa: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
If Na'ŋifi Fasu'xa had not already possessed an orthography, the phonetic transcription would be quite different. A dearth of phonemes indicates a wealth of allophones. | If Na'ŋifi Fasu'xa had not already possessed an orthography, the phonetic transcription would be quite different. A dearth of phonemes indicates a wealth of allophones. | ||
/n/ [n] becomes [l] before a following consonant | /n/ [n] becomes [l] before a following consonant | ||
/ | /antufi/ [ɔl.tu.'fi'] | ||
/m/ [m] becomes a homorganic nasal [m], [n], or [ŋ] before a following consonant. | |||
[m] | /ta'amxi/ ['tɛ':ŋ.hi] | ||
[n] | /ŋ/ becomes [ʔ] in word-initial position, but remains /ŋ/ elsewhere. | ||
[ŋ] | /ŋa'sinu/ ['ʔɛ'.zi.nu] | ||
[ | /na'ŋifi/ ['nɛ'.ŋi.vi] | ||
[ | /x/ [x] becones [h] before or after any consonant except /x/ | ||
[ | /xiupxa/ ['hjo'p.ha] | ||
Voiceless consonants (i.e., everything except the nasals) becomes voiced following a voiced consonant (i.e., a nasal). | |||
' | /a'tmaxi/ ['a'd.mɛ.γi] | ||
Vowel patterns | Voiceless consonants become voiced between vowels, if they follow the accented syllable. | ||
/a'tmaxi/ ['a'd.mɛ.γi] | |||
/atmaxi'/ [ad.mɛ.'xi'] | |||
/na'ŋifi fasu'xa/ ['nɛ'.ŋi.vi fɔ.'so'.γa] | |||
==Vowel Patterns== | |||
Although Na'ŋifi Fasu'xa appears to have only three vowels, the interactions between them have created unique bivocalic and trivocalic patterns. These are laid out below - the first set of vowel indicates the orthography, the second the pronunciation. | |||
Vowel patterns | |||
Bivocalic: | Bivocalic: | ||
a i > ɛ i | a i > ɛ i | ||
| Line 55: | Line 61: | ||
u u i > u u i | u u i > u u i | ||
u u u > u u u | u u u > u u u | ||
Should I add u i > ɯ i and i u > y u? | Should I add u i > ɯ i and i u > y u to this mix? | ||
--[[User:LinguarumMagister|LinguarumMagister]] | --[[User:LinguarumMagister|LinguarumMagister]] 19:46, 23 August 2012 (PDT) | ||
Revision as of 18:46, 23 August 2012
I know that the syllable structure and length is a little engelang-ish, but the inherent instability is intentional. There will be a vulgar NF from which the daughter languages will be derived - but I have to finish the standard language first.
8/26: Given Greenberg's Linguistic Universal number 16, perhaps auxiliary verbs before the main verb transform the main verb into an subordinate adverb, thus honoring LU15 and LU16. Any thoughts?
Hmm, that would preserve the basic structure. I like the idea. --LinguarumMagister 18:07, 13 August 2012 (PDT)
Phonology Revision
Allophones
If Na'ŋifi Fasu'xa had not already possessed an orthography, the phonetic transcription would be quite different. A dearth of phonemes indicates a wealth of allophones. /n/ [n] becomes [l] before a following consonant /antufi/ [ɔl.tu.'fi'] /m/ [m] becomes a homorganic nasal [m], [n], or [ŋ] before a following consonant. /ta'amxi/ ['tɛ':ŋ.hi] /ŋ/ becomes [ʔ] in word-initial position, but remains /ŋ/ elsewhere. /ŋa'sinu/ ['ʔɛ'.zi.nu] /na'ŋifi/ ['nɛ'.ŋi.vi] /x/ [x] becones [h] before or after any consonant except /x/ /xiupxa/ ['hjo'p.ha] Voiceless consonants (i.e., everything except the nasals) becomes voiced following a voiced consonant (i.e., a nasal). /a'tmaxi/ ['a'd.mɛ.γi] Voiceless consonants become voiced between vowels, if they follow the accented syllable. /a'tmaxi/ ['a'd.mɛ.γi] /atmaxi'/ [ad.mɛ.'xi'] /na'ŋifi fasu'xa/ ['nɛ'.ŋi.vi fɔ.'so'.γa]
Vowel Patterns
Although Na'ŋifi Fasu'xa appears to have only three vowels, the interactions between them have created unique bivocalic and trivocalic patterns. These are laid out below - the first set of vowel indicates the orthography, the second the pronunciation. Vowel patterns Bivocalic: a i > ɛ i a u > ɔ u i a > e a i i > i i i u > i u u a > o a u i > u i u u > u u Trivocalic: a a a > a a a a a i > a ɛ i a a u > a ɔ u a i a > ɛ e a a i i > ɛ i i a i u > ɛ i u a u a > ɔ o a a u i > ɔ u i a u u > ɔ u u i a a > e a a i a i > e ɛ i i a u > e ɔ u i i a > i e a i i i > i i i i i u > i u u u a a > o a a u a i > o ɛ i u a u > o ɔ u u i a > u e a u i i > u i i u i u > u i u u u a > u o a u u i > u u i u u u > u u u Should I add u i > ɯ i and i u > y u to this mix? --LinguarumMagister 19:46, 23 August 2012 (PDT)
