FrathWiki talk:Maintenance: Difference between revisions

From FrathWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 12: Line 12:
I am also not sure where to put [[WikiNode]], [[Conlang Recognition Chart]] and various others (that I'll list here as I remember them).--[[User:Tropylium|<span class="IPA">Trɔpʏliʊm</span>]] • [[User talk:Tropylium|blah]] 13:24, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
I am also not sure where to put [[WikiNode]], [[Conlang Recognition Chart]] and various others (that I'll list here as I remember them).--[[User:Tropylium|<span class="IPA">Trɔpʏliʊm</span>]] • [[User talk:Tropylium|blah]] 13:24, 23 July 2009 (UTC)


== Duplicate pages (sort of) ==
I've added categories to [[Khangaþyagon]]
 
--[[User:PeteBleackley|PeteBleackley]] 13:16, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
*[[IPA]] (brief table); [[International Phonetic Alphabet]] (WP fork)
*[[Self-segregating morphology]] (stubby description); [[List of self-segregating morphology methods]] (CLWB fork)

Latest revision as of 05:16, 4 February 2010

Category issues

Uncategorized

Taking a trip to Special:UncategorizedPages one will find that about half of this wiki's pages (which is perhaps more than half of the content) are uncategorized. I have attempted to clean out immediately categorizable pages. Most of them are however related to this or that conlang. Knowing that not all conlangers want to have their pages explicitely listed anywhere before they're in a vaigly presentable state (including myself!) I've left these alone for now.

Seeing however that quite a few (for example Dalcurian, Khangaþyagon or Senjecan) are among the more complete works on this wiki, I wonder if we could just go on with them, or at least ask. Or indeed, is everything about them uncategorized, or are some basic pages categorized? Should check that too.

Another large block is the conlang relay subpages; I'm sure nobody would mind categorizing those, but do we need to? The main pages for each can be found quite well. So on one hand, unnecessary work; on the other, they really stick out in the list. :ʃ

The likes of Europic and Uralo-Siberian languages are probably common-interest enuff that we don't have to worry about page "ownership", but should they go as reconstructed languages, language families or what??

I am also not sure where to put WikiNode, Conlang Recognition Chart and various others (that I'll list here as I remember them).--Trɔpʏliʊmblah 13:24, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

I've added categories to Khangaþyagon --PeteBleackley 13:16, 4 February 2010 (UTC)