Round Robin Conlang: Difference between revisions
m (→Grammar: fixing previous mistakes of mine (thanks to whoever spotted the imperativ)) |
m (Added missing vocab item) |
||
Line 159: | Line 159: | ||
===Pronouns=== | ===Pronouns=== | ||
;ɔt: 3rd person singular animate | |||
;tsoi: 3rd person dual | ;tsoi: 3rd person dual | ||
;tsov: 3rd person distributive plural | ;tsov: 3rd person distributive plural |
Revision as of 02:09, 23 December 2009
The round robin conlang is a collaborative conlanging game in progress, begun and overseen by Pete Bleackley (here). To quote the rules:
Each person in turn [...] creates one new rule and one new root, plus some examples to show the consequences, and passes it on to the next person on the list. When it gets back to me, we start another loop, and keep going for as long as we feel necessary.
The grammar presented here is from the end of round 3.
Game organisation
The current turn order is
- Pete Bleackley
- Matthew Turnbull
- Daniel Demski
- John Vertical
- Alex Fink
- Patrick Dunn
- Vincent Pistelli
- Mechthild Czapp
- Brett Williams
- Alex Bicksler
and back to Pete Bleackley to complete the round.
Grammar
Morphology
- Roots are CVC and verbal in meaning
- Verbal 1st person is indicated by derivational suffix [-af] which triggers spirant lenition.
Ex. bivaf - I ask, tiɣaf - I speak, tsʼuð˜af - I die.
- Verbal 2nd person is marked by the suffix -es, which changes the stem analogue to the 1st person.
Frex: ha bives: you asked, vijes: you create (if I understood rule 1 correctly)
- Verbal 3rd person is indicated by the suffix [-ú], which also triggers spirant lenition
Ex. ha vivú - it grew, ha vivivu ívib i.ɔ - the plants each grew very quickly
- Dual verbal number is indicated by the particle [i.ɔ] at the end of the clause.
- Plural verbal number is indicated by reduplicating the VC of the verbal root, copying any lenition. When [iɔ] cooccurs with this it has distributive rather than dual force.
Eg. kʼéχéχaf - we (all) come (together), kʼéχéχaf iɔ - we (all) come one at a time.
- Simple past is marked by the particle "ha" before the verb.
Ex. ha bivaf iɔ - We two asked.
- There is a different past tense for events which happened before the conscious lifetime of the speaker or in myths. This tense uses the particle "χu". It can also be used instead of "ha" to indicate that the speaker is unsure about the truth of the statement.
"χu bives" You asked (either before my lifetime or only maybe)
- The passive voice is formed by prefixing é to the stem and gemminating the first consonant:
Ha ébbivú: He was asked.
- A prefix [í-] derives agents (also, it seems, some experiencers/undergoers from intransitiv roots). Note this being mark'd for high tone - default tone is not indicated. This also does not trigger spirantization.
Eg. [ítig] "speaker", [ítsʼun] "mortal", [íkʼeb] "man"
- Patient nouns are formed by infixing a homoorganic nasal before the last consonant
- bimb - question
- boimb - attempt
- kant - arrow
- tiŋg - word
- vent - sight
- viñj - artefact
- A tool or body part can be derived from an agent noun by infixing a homoorganic nasal before the first consonant, and moving the high pitch onto the second syllable.
- The intensive of the verbal root is formed by suffixing -aq, which triggers gemination of the previous consonant.
Eg. [bib] "to ask" [bibbaq] "to interrogate"; [tig] "to speak" [tiggaq] "to give a speech."
- The imparativ mode is express'd by changing the person suffix' initial vowel to <e> and geminating the root-final consonant (if not geminated yet).
- kattes - Shoot! (singular)
- katattes - Shoot! (plural)
- katattef - Let us shoot! (plural)
- tiggaχes - Give a speech! (sing.) (Not *tiggaqqes nor *tigggaχes)
- tigiggaχes - Give speeches! (plur.)
- A participle is formed from the verb by spirant lenition and appending a vowel, [-e] if the stem vowel is front and [-o] if it's not. Participles do not distinguish active from passive.
- k'eb "be male", k'eve "male (adj.)"
- tap "break", tafo "broken" or "which has broken s.t."
- Nominal paucal number is derived from count nouns by the suffix [-ól], for mass nouns this derivational process signifies a sufficiency of the noun.
- bimból - a few questions
- kantól - a few arrows
- ventól - some sights
- boimból - a few attempts
- íbetsʼól - sufficient sand
- Possessive pronouns are treated as participles formed from the pronominal root.
- gɔs - "I"
- gɔso - "my"
- sɛt - "you"
- sɛse -- "your"
- bimb gɔso "my question"
- Non-pronominal possessors are cast using a third person pronoun tocarry the possessive marking, which cliticises to the possessing noun.
- intán lɛqatɔso - "a goose's leg"
- ínukól ísuŋóltsoio - "two ploughmen's wives" (lit. "women")
- A prefix [du-] marks instrumental case. An initial vowel* will be replaced, but its tone will remain.
- dukant - with an arrow
- duntáp - with an axe
- dumvíj - with a tool
- dúbetsʼ - with sand
*We only have examples with [i] so far, so it's possible this only happens before sufficiently close vowels.
Syntax
- I thought I'd gently dip our toes in some larger structure, with conjunctions that go between phrases, for instance "vigi" meaning "because", that is that the first clause is implied, caused or
motivated by the second:
- "tiggaχes vigi ha bivaf" -- You give a speech because I asked.
- "ha boivaf iɔ vigi kʼeves" -- We two tried because you're a man.
- "tsʼununnaχes iɔ vigi ha kʼéχéχes" -- You each die a terrible death because you all came.
- Word order is VSO but pronouns, if present, go before the verb. When the subject, pronouns match the number of the verb, and are correspondingly distributive or collective.
- tsai ha vet íbetsʼaqól iɔ - The two saw enough powder (flour).
- tsov gɔs vetet iɔ - Each sees me.
- Modifiers of the noun follow the noun they modify.
- kant tafo - broken arrow
- Negation of finite verb phrases is sometimes accomplished with tsele coming after the verb. However, many verbs have irregular negations, accomplished with (often unrelated) participles placed in apposition with the subject. Note, it is often the words which do not have clear opposites which have irregular negation. A clear opposite is one which would be synonymous with negation- for example, "he does not ask" is not synonymous with "he answers", so it gains an irregular negation; but "he does not die" is synonymous with "he lives", so both are acceptable things to say. The irregular opposite participles are not used as full, independent verbs.
Examples:
- bivu tontevigi sɛt tajo - He asks although you are not asking.
- kʼéχú tsele - He does not come; synonymous with neŋ
Vocab
offset entries are derivations from the root above them
Roots
- bib
- ask
- bibbaq
- to interrogate
- bimb
- question
- tajo
- not asking (irregular)
- boib
- try
- boimb
- an attempt
- betsʼ
- be_a_grain (like sand)
- betsʼaq
- be_a_powder (like flour)
- íbetsʼ
- sand
- kat
- shoot
- kant
- arrow
- íkat
- archer
- iŋkát
- bow
- kim
- be female
- k'eb
- be male
- kʼéq
- come
- neŋ
- to stay behind or away; not come
- nuk
- be female
- qats'
- - to finish something
- qants'
- - a finished task
- sas
- wet, moisten
- ísas
- moisture, liquid
- ísasaq
- water
- suŋ
- to plough
- ísuŋ
- ploughman
- insúŋ
- plough
- suŋŋ
- ploughed land
- tán
- walk
- ítán
- nomad
- intán
- leg
- tánn
- footpath
- tap
- break
- ítap
- breaker
- intáp
- axe
- tig
- speak
- tiggaq
- to give a speech
- tiŋg
- word
- tsʼun
- die
- tsʼunnaq
- to die a terrible, torturous death
- vet
- see
- vent
- sight
- ívet
- seer
- imvét
- eye
- vib
- grow
- vibbaq
- grow very fast
- ívib
- plant
- vij
- create
- viñj
- artefact
- ívij
- creator
- imvíj
- tool
Nouns
- lɛqat
- goose
Pronouns
- ɔt
- 3rd person singular animate
- tsoi
- 3rd person dual
- tsov
- 3rd person distributive plural
- gɔs
- 1st person
- sɛt
- 2nd person singular informal
Particles
- ha
- simple past
- iɔ
- two, dual; distributive
- tsele
- negation of verbs without irregular negation
Conjunctions
- vigi
- because
- tontevigi
- although
- vani
- if
- tontevani
- lest