Proto-West Altaic': Difference between revisions

From FrathWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→‎Mid to late PWA': questions…)
Line 28: Line 28:
ca. -1.5ka
ca. -1.5ka
*/t tʂ s n/ → /ṯ ṯ s̱ ṉ/ (with the [ʧ] allophone also generalized to both stops)
*/t tʂ s n/ → /ṯ ṯ s̱ ṉ/ (with the [ʧ] allophone also generalized to both stops)
*Voicing processes
*Voicing processes (or maybe later? NB /h ħ/ will not voice)
*Introduce /ɬ̻ ɬˤ/, whence /l̻ ɫ/ (cf. [[East Persian']]!)
*Introduce /ɬ̻ ɬˤ/, whence /l̻ ɫ/ (cf. [[East Persian']]!)
*/θˤ/ → /ħ/; under voicing /ɫ/ (pre-existing /h ħ/ do not voice!)
*/θˤ/ → /ħ/, /ɫ/
*Velar rounding (maybe not with vowel elision but mergers / harmony?)
*Velar rounding (maybe not with vowel elision but mergers / harmony?)
**And where did that lone xʷ come from??
*Pharyngeal harmony (spills over into vowels too)
*Pharyngeal harmony (spills over into vowels too)
**Emphasis spreds thru a word unless blocked by a velar obstruent or nasal.
**Emphasis spreds thru a word unless blocked by a velar obstruent or nasal.
Line 89: Line 90:
| ħ
| ħ
|- align="center"
|- align="center"
! align="left"| <small>Voiced</small>
! align="left"| (<small>Voiced</small>
|
|
|
|
Line 96: Line 97:
| ʐˠ
| ʐˠ
|
|
| (ɣʷ)
| (ɣʷ))
|- align="center"
|- align="center"
! align="left" colspan="2"| Nasals
! align="left" colspan="2"| Nasals

Revision as of 14:00, 2 November 2009

Proto-Altaic' to Erly Proto-West Altaic'

  • /s ʂ/ → [ts tʂ] and /ɽ/ → [ɖ] when initial or prenasal
  • Lenition of dorsal stops to fricativs in vicinity of other stops
  • Retroflexes (but not the palato-alveolar sibilant allophones) acquire velarization
  • /w/ is also possibly alreddy [βˠ] by this stage (areal influence? CF Proto-Betamax)
  • /N/ drops before affricates and [ɖ], phonemicizing 'em

Erly to mid PWA'

Till ca. -3ka.

Middle PWA' had two main dialects: Northern, spoken in the vicinity of the Aral Sea; and Southern, spoken as a continuum across a wide area south of this, with the most important subdialects being West proper just south of the Caspian Sea, and Proto-Sadabax, spoken around where Samarkand exists in reality.

  • /x xʷ Nx Nxʷ χ χʷ Nχ Nχʷ/ → /h f ŋh ŋʷh ħ fˤ ŋħ ŋʷħ/
  • Retroflex stops (but generally not affricates) → velars before front vowels, emphatics elsewhere; [ɽˠ] → /ɡ/ consistently
  • POA chain shift involving labials. The results differ a bit by the dialect - West proper develops an emphasis contrast, while North shifts this further to a palatalization / velarization contrast (in some cases with a third dimension too). This all may have been brought about from contact with the Transcaspian' family.
    • /kʷ ŋʷ qʷ/ → /p m pˤ/ (South), /pˠ m kʴ/ (North)
    • /p f fˤ/ → /t̻ θ θˤ/ (South), /pʲ fʲ fˠ/ (North) (/m/ is not pushed due to distributional differences)
    • Note that this dedorsalization is later than the one affecting spirants, since their reflexes behave here as labials!
  • Approximant drift
    • /l/ → /n̻/
    • /j/ → /ɟ/ → /dʲ/ (North), → /d̻/ (South)
    • /w/ → /βˠ/ → /bˠ/ (North), → /bˤ/ (South)
  • /q/ → /ʔ/ (South), /kʴ/ (North)
  • /θ/ → /s̻/ (→ /sʲ/ in North and Sadabax)
    • --hang on, where does North get this /θ/? Is there a split development of *f or *h?
  • /ts/ → /s̻/ (only in West)

Mid to late PWA'

ca. -1.5ka

  • /t tʂ s n/ → /ṯ ṯ s̱ ṉ/ (with the [ʧ] allophone also generalized to both stops)
  • Voicing processes (or maybe later? NB /h ħ/ will not voice)
  • Introduce /ɬ̻ ɬˤ/, whence /l̻ ɫ/ (cf. East Persian'!)
  • /θˤ/ → /ħ/, /ɫ/
  • Velar rounding (maybe not with vowel elision but mergers / harmony?)
    • And where did that lone xʷ come from??
  • Pharyngeal harmony (spills over into vowels too)
    • Emphasis spreds thru a word unless blocked by a velar obstruent or nasal.
    • The laminal/apical distinction in coronals is neutralized when emphatic.


Labial Lamino-
dental
Apico-
postalveolar
Velar Laryngeal
Plain Emphatic Plain Emphatic Plain Labial Plain Emphatic
Stops Voiceless p ṯˤ k (ʔ ~ ∅)
Voiced b ḏˤ ɡ ɡʷ
Fricatives Voiceless ʂˣ h ħ
(Voiced ʐˠ (ɣʷ))
Nasals m ṉˤ ŋ
Laterals (ḻ) ɫ
Semivowels ɻˠ j w

(Depending on the font, the laminality signs (subsc. square) may look like dentality sings (subsc. bridge), but since they're dental anyway, that's no problem.)