Talk:Grand Master Plan: Difference between revisions
From FrathWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(I thought the meaning is wider) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Doesn't "GMP" apply to ''any'' [[a posteriori]] language with a specific set of soundlaws, not just bogolangs? IIRC I've seen the term used in the context of eg. Terkunan, which does not seem to be based on the model of any existing language. --[[User:Tropylium|<span class="IPA">Trɔpʏliʊm</span>]] • [[User talk:Tropylium|blah]] 12:55, 27 August 2009 (UTC) | Doesn't "GMP" apply to ''any'' [[a posteriori]] language with a specific set of soundlaws, not just bogolangs? IIRC I've seen the term used in the context of eg. Terkunan, which does not seem to be based on the model of any existing language. --[[User:Tropylium|<span class="IPA">Trɔpʏliʊm</span>]] • [[User talk:Tropylium|blah]] 12:55, 27 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
: I tried to improve the wording and include the wider meaning (although i disapprove of that usage since it makes the term a rather senseless synonym of ''historical phonology''). Incidentally this spawned two further terminology stubs for [[histlang]] and [[conlang family]]. [[User:Melroch|BPJ]] 08:06, 29 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 00:06, 29 August 2009
Doesn't "GMP" apply to any a posteriori language with a specific set of soundlaws, not just bogolangs? IIRC I've seen the term used in the context of eg. Terkunan, which does not seem to be based on the model of any existing language. --Trɔpʏliʊm • blah 12:55, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
- I tried to improve the wording and include the wider meaning (although i disapprove of that usage since it makes the term a rather senseless synonym of historical phonology). Incidentally this spawned two further terminology stubs for histlang and conlang family. BPJ 08:06, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
