Kitchen sink conlang: Difference between revisions

From FrathWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (cat)
(expand a bit)
Line 1: Line 1:
A '''kitchen sink conlang''' is a conlang that has "everything including the kitchen sink", i.e. a conlang of unrealistic phonological and/or grammatical complexity.  While [[natlang]]s can be quite complex and a good [[naturalistic artlang]] reflects this, a kitchen sink conlang involves excessive complication without adding more depth.
A '''kitchen sink conlang''' is a conlang that has "everything including the kitchen sink", i.e. a pejorative term for a conlang of unrealistic phonological and/or grammatical complexity.  While [[natlang]]s can be quite complex and a good [[naturalistic artlang]] reflects this, a kitchen sink conlang involves excessive complication without adding more depth.
 
No single feature can turn a conlang into a kitchen sink - what is called for is a combination of several perceivedly unusual features, or even ordinary features that do not "work together".
 
A conlang should not be call'd "kitchensinky" lightly, without considering the risk of [[ANADEW]]. The phonology of [[wikipedia:Dahalo language|Dahalo]] is a good example.


[[Category:Types of conlangs]]
[[Category:Types of conlangs]]

Revision as of 05:35, 23 July 2009

A kitchen sink conlang is a conlang that has "everything including the kitchen sink", i.e. a pejorative term for a conlang of unrealistic phonological and/or grammatical complexity. While natlangs can be quite complex and a good naturalistic artlang reflects this, a kitchen sink conlang involves excessive complication without adding more depth.

No single feature can turn a conlang into a kitchen sink - what is called for is a combination of several perceivedly unusual features, or even ordinary features that do not "work together".

A conlang should not be call'd "kitchensinky" lightly, without considering the risk of ANADEW. The phonology of Dahalo is a good example.