Angrex: Difference between revisions
(→aspiration development: cleanup) |
|||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
* /æ iː uː ʊ/ → [ɪə ɪj ʏw ʏ] | * /æ iː uː ʊ/ → [ɪə ɪj ʏw ʏ] | ||
== | ==Aspiration development== | ||
This series of sound changes forms a major isogloss among the Anglic languages. | |||
* The trigger is the loss of onset /s/ before another consonant. This leads to the phonemicization of aspiration in voiceless stops. | |||
* Aspiration also develops before a syllabic consonant such as [ɫ̩]. | |||
** ''I'd really like to extend this to [ɚ], but that doesn't seem to fit into the timeline.'' | |||
ts | * Additionally, /ts/ → /tʰ/. | ||
anti-Grassman | * This system is then muddled by application of anti-Grassman's Law, i.e. in a word containing two aspirates within one syllable of one another, the latter is deaspirated. | ||
==Somewhat later== | ==Somewhat later== |
Revision as of 06:01, 30 August 2008
A tentativ name for my future Anglic language. May be switched to a geographic-based one eventually.
Owes much to Futurese.
Initial dialect features
Note that these features' current geographical distribution does not necessarily limit Ängrex's, since a few of them are still spreding. We can fairly surely place it within North America, however…
- Whine-wine merger: /ʍ/ merged into /w/.
- Yod-dropping: Early Modern English /iʊ/ becomes /uː/ (GOOSE) if preceded by an initial consonant. Likewise /iʊɹ/ → /ʊɹ/. Typical exceptions, such as sugar, sure, apply.
- The following rhotic vowels are distinguished: /ɪɹ ɛɹ ɜɹ ɑɹ ɔɹ/ (NEAR SQUARE START NURSE NORTH). [ɚ] (LETTER) is an unstressed allophone of /ɜɹ/. /oɹ/ (FORCE) merges into /ɔɹ/; /ʊɹ/ CURE merges varyingly with /ɔɹ/ or the disyllable /uɜɹ/.
- The cot-caught and father-bother mergers apply, i.e. /ɒ ɔː/ both merge into /ɑː/.
- Medial flapping of /t d/ (to [ɾ] when posttonic) applies. Glottalization does not.
- The clusters /ns nz/ insert epenthetic /t d/ to become /nts ndz/.
- /tj tɹ dj dɹ/ are affricated to /ʧ ʧɹ ʤ ʤɹ/. (Note that affrication of /sj sɹ zj/ is older and applies to all English varieties, AFATAK.)
- Coda /d/ is lost after /n l/.
- Collapse to a three-vowel system in final unstressed position: /iː/ (HAPPY) becomes /eɪ/ (FACE), while /ə ɜɹ/ becomes /ɑː/. /oʊ/ remains. (Phonetically, these are pretty much [e a o].)
The following changes are still best considered phonetic changes that do not disturb the phonological system.
- /æ iː uː ʊ/ → [ɪə ɪj ʏw ʏ]
Aspiration development
This series of sound changes forms a major isogloss among the Anglic languages.
- The trigger is the loss of onset /s/ before another consonant. This leads to the phonemicization of aspiration in voiceless stops.
- Aspiration also develops before a syllabic consonant such as [ɫ̩].
- I'd really like to extend this to [ɚ], but that doesn't seem to fit into the timeline.
- Additionally, /ts/ → /tʰ/.
- This system is then muddled by application of anti-Grassman's Law, i.e. in a word containing two aspirates within one syllable of one another, the latter is deaspirated.
Somewhat later
Two changes that, while common in even contemporary English dialects, should be considered late adoptions in Ängrex on the basis of their effects wrt. aspiration.
- A coda stop is lost before another obstruent. If another voiceless stop precedes, it gains aspiration.
- /θ ð/ become /t d/ in onset position; /f v/ in coda.
labial/liquid chainshift
v > b / _V v > w / V_ w > v/f / C_ r > w / _V 5 > w l > 4 / C_
more vowel shifts
I E V Vw Vj > e & @ u i aU aI eI oI oU > Aw &j ji oj u I@ Ij Y(w) > jA jej jo(w) Or Ar 3r Er Ir > O A @ & j& r= l= n= > A o A~ @{m n N}. > &~
palatalization etc. glide stuff
tSh tS dZ S Z > ts`h ts` dz` s` z` thj tj dj sj zj nj > ts\h ts\ dz\ s\ z\ J jth jt jd js jz jn ditto j > 0 / _l_ _4_ _BLB_ s > s`/ w_
Aw > o w > 0 / _RFX_
various
h > 0 / V_V dz dz` dz\ > z z` z\ (except prenasal)
Orthography
Per IPA, except:
- A digraph with <h> signifies aspiration.
- /j/ is written as ; similarly /w/ as when not in absolute syllable-initial position.
- <c x j> are /tɕ ɕ ʑ/ before an orthographic , /tʂ ʂ ʐ/ elsewhere.
- need to decide if coda position needs a different solution
- <ñ ng> are /ɲ ŋ/.
- The lo vowels are <ä a> = /æ ɑ/.
- or should /æ/ be the unmarked <a>? /ɑ/ could be spelled with something derived from <ah> or <ar> or <aw>.