Lotá: Difference between revisions
Line 112: | Line 112: | ||
laggyn - accusative | laggyn - accusative | ||
lakty - oblique | lakty - oblique | ||
The eighth declension contains only one word - lhik, meaning ear(s), which is the only example of terminal /k/ (which is why it's treated like a slant phoneme in that position, not a full-fledged phoneme). It's declension is reminescent of the fourth declension in some ways: | |||
lhik - ear(s) - nominative | |||
lhiklhyn - accusative | |||
lhiklhty - oblique | |||
[[Lotá Pronouns]] are somewhat more complex, as they distinguish number and proximity (or failing that inclusiveness and exclusiveness). | [[Lotá Pronouns]] are somewhat more complex, as they distinguish number and proximity (or failing that inclusiveness and exclusiveness). |
Revision as of 13:14, 8 August 2008
Bold text
Lotá | |
---|---|
Pronounced: | /lota˥/ - [ˈlo˧.ta˥] |
Timeline and Universe: | theoretically this universe, future |
Species: | Humanoid |
Spoken: | Central North coast of Lhined |
Total speakers: | ~5,000 |
Writing system: | None, romanized for ease in article |
Genealogy: | isolate, assumed distant relation to Bokeih, notable Rajo-Faraneit and Etimri influences |
Typology | |
Morphological type: | Inflecting |
Morphosyntactic alignment: | Nominative-Accusative |
Basic word order: | SVO with frequent use of SOV |
Credits | |
Creator: | Humancadaver101 aka Schwhatever aka Buckfush530 |
Created: | August 2008 |
Lotá is a language spoken slightly inland from the coast opposite the Timereitah. The speakers were typically involved in trade negotiations between continental merchants (specifically the Faraneih, but also Raj and a few other groups) and the coastal fishermen (specifically the Tnusjakt speakers).
Phonology
Word Initial Consonants
- /p b f v m t d s z n ʃ ʒ l ɬ c ɟ ç ʝ ɲ k g x ɣ ʟ/
- Romanized as "p b f m t d s z n x zh l lh c j ch jh ng k g kh gh lg"
Word Medial Consonants
- /p b b: f v m t t: d d: s s: z n ʃ ʃ: ʒ l ɬ c ɟ ɟ: ç ʝ ɲ k g g: x ɣ ʟ/
- Romanized as "p b bb f m t tt d dd s ss z n x xx zh l lh c j jj ch jh ng k g gg kh gh lg"
Word Terminal Consonants
- /v z ʝ ɣ ʔ/
- Romanized as "v z jh gh q"
General Vowels
- /a a: e e: i i: o o:/
- Romanized as "a aa e ee i ii o oo"
Word Terminal Vowels
- /ə ɒ: ɛ: ɪ: ɔ: ə~ ɒ:~ ɛ:~ ɪ:~ ɔ:~ a˥ e˥ i˥ o˥ a:˥ e:˥ i:˥ o:˥ a˩ e˩ i˩ o˩ a:˩ e:˩ i:˩ o:˩ a˧ e˧ i˧ o˧ a:˧ e:˧ i:˧ o:˧/
- Romanized as "y â ê î ô yn an en in on á é í ó áá éé íí óó à è ì ò ù àà èè ìì òò a e i o aa ee ii oo"
Morphology
Like most of the Measceineafh Sprachbund, a relatively high level of synthesis in the verbal morphology is in the process of developing. Unlike most of the other languages in the region, however, Lotá has a history of nominal inflection, although, extensive contact with Rajo-Faraneih Languages has dramatically reduced this (as well as resulted in the loss of the superlative and a more shadowy plurality distinction).
Nominal Morphology
There are three cases: nominative, accusative, and oblique. Accusative forms by nasalizing an exposed, terminal vowel (why lacks an underlying consonant which is now expressed by tonality terminally), or if there is a terminal consonant or a non-reduced vowel with an underlying phoneme, adding a /ə~/. Oblique is formed by adding -/tə/ or -/ə/ if the root ends in a voiced consonant.
The first declension is made of nouns that end in any fricative. Those that end in fricatives are devoiced in non-nominative cases.
sez - fish(es) - nominative sesyn - accusative sesty - oblique
The second declension contains all nouns which end in a glottal stop. The /ʔ/ becomes one of /p t c k/ in non-nominative cases. As a result, many nominative homophones are produced:
daq - wolf/wolves - nominative dakyn - accusative dakty - nominative
daq - merchant(s) - nominative dapyn - accusative dapty - nominative
The third declension is made of nouns that end in a nasalized vowel. The orthography hides the distinction, that word terminal <n> nasalizes the proceeding vowel, while word medial does not. Several nouns are merged in the nominative, although distinct elsewhere.
sovyn - horn(s) - nominative sovonyn - accusative sovony - oblique
sovyn - pain(s) - nominative sovomyn - accusative sovomy - oblique
The fourth declension is made of nouns that end in a "clear" vowel (middle tone /a a: e e: i i: o o:/). Here, a deleted approximant appears in non-nominative cases. Some nouns are homophones for the nominative but otherwise distinct.
lhi - finger(s) - nominative lhilhyn - accusative lhilhy - oblique
lhi - waste - nominative lhilhyn - accusative lhilhty - oblique
The fifth declension is made of nouns that end in a high tone vowel. The internally preserved plosive varies, as nouns can be homophones in the nominative but distinct in the other cases.
dó - pig(s) - nominative dogyn - accusative dogy - oblique
dó - fruit(s) - nominative dobyn - accusative doby - oblique
lotá - lotá person(s) or the lotá language - nominative lotadyn - accusative lotady - oblique
The sixth declension is made of nouns the end in a low tone vowel. The internally preserved fricative varies, as nouns can be homophones in the nominative, but distinct in the other cases.
lhì - gem(s) - nominative lhizyn - accusative lhizy - oblique
lhì - exchange(s), trade(s) - nominative lhivyn - accusative lhivy - oblique
A seventh declension, formed by earlier *-aad' or *-aat' roots also exists, but it is highly irregular. Unlike most other declensions, here the accusative and oblique cases merge between couplets that end in glottal stops or a high tone. For example:
lá - blood - nominative laggyn - accusative lakty - oblique
laq - shoe(s) - nominative laggyn - accusative lakty - oblique
The eighth declension contains only one word - lhik, meaning ear(s), which is the only example of terminal /k/ (which is why it's treated like a slant phoneme in that position, not a full-fledged phoneme). It's declension is reminescent of the fourth declension in some ways:
lhik - ear(s) - nominative lhiklhyn - accusative lhiklhty - oblique
Lotá Pronouns are somewhat more complex, as they distinguish number and proximity (or failing that inclusiveness and exclusiveness).
Verbal Morphology
There are two main verbal declensions, which (for ease) will be referred to as the first and second declension. The first declension is highly regular and clearly defines the root and affixes of the verb. For example, with gek (to give):
ni geki ki gáz ni gek- i ki gáz 1.S.NOM give-IMP to 2.S.OBL I'm giving you (something).
ni geksi ki gaz ni gek- si ki gaz 1.S.NOM give-PRF to 2.S.OBL I gave you (something).
The second declension, on the other hand, has the final consonant of the root voice if unvoiced and geminate. Virtually all of them end with /g/ or /k/. Another example with lag (to bleed):
ni laggi ni lag(g)-i 1.S.NOM bleed- IMP I'm bleeding.
ni lagsi ni lag- si 1.S.NOM bleed-PRF I bled.
Once the root and the tense/aspect marker have been added, another series of suffixes can be dumped at the end of the verb. The next one is to mark for mood - the optative marker, either present and marking or absent and non-optative.
ni geksindi ki gaz ni gek- si- ndi ki gaz 1.S.NOM give-PRF-OPT to 2.S.OBL I should have give you (something).
Next, one of various negative markers can follow. These do not compete with the optative marker. For example:
ni geksiatna ki gaz ni gek- si- atna ki gaz 1.S.NOM give-PRF-NEG to 2.S.OBL I didn't give you (something).
ni geksindiatna ki gaz ni gek- si- ndi-atna ki gaz 1.S.NOM give-PRF-OPT-NEG to 2.S.OBL I shouldn't have give you (something).
There are two main negative markers: -atna, and -lhia. The first is used for verbs that usually take solid objects or a variety of objects. The second is for verbs that typically take fluid or no object.
ni laggilhia ni lag(g)-i- lhia 1.S.NOM bleed- IMP-NEG I'm not bleeding.
ni zivoilhia ni zivo-i -lhia 1.S.NOM age- IMP-NEG I'm not getting older.
Following negative markers, other mood and aspect suffixes may be added.
ni lagsiná. ni lag- si- ná. 1.S.NOM bleed-PRF-CONT (As/While) I (continued to) bleed.
ni lagsiky. ni lag- si- ky 1.S.NOM bleed-PRF-EMPH I (totally/hella) bled profusely/to death!
ni lagsiq ni lag- si- q 1.S.NOM bleed-PRF-IRR I might have bled.
ni lagsin ni lag- si- n 1.S.NOM bleed-PRF-POT I could have bled.
The irrealis marker -q proceeds all other "Other Mood" markers (but not optative or negative markers) when stacked, but mutates to -t when medial:
ni laggitky. ni lagg- i- t- ky. 1.S.NOM bleed-IMP-IRR-EMPH I may bleed to death!
Further along, the emphatic (which mutates to -ke- medially) always proceeds the continuative (which mutates to -nab- medially), which in turn proceeds the potential markers (which becomes -yn if following a consonantal ending).
ni laggiken. ni lagg- i- ke- n 1.S.NOM bleed-IMP-EMPH-POT I could be bleeding!
ni laggikenabyn. ni lagg- i- ke- nab- yn 1.S.NOM bleed-IMP-EMPH-CONT-POT I could still be bleeding!
Syntax
Noun Phrase
As part of the Measceineafh Sprachbund, it's only natural for the noun phrase to mix right branching and left branching elements almost equally - with a special emphasis on quantifiers in opposition to qualifiers.
Basic Structures
Lotá is obviously SV. It's default form is SVO, although SOV is a secondary word order for stressing direct objects.